Going Medieval
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Going Medieval rate it? TrueGG Rating 85.2%

Release date: Mar 17, 2026 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it lower than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks. Recent reviews are falling.

Think twice if you are

  • Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
  • Players who want a polished, finished game (reports it feels unfinished)
  • Players particular about controls and UI

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
85.2%
▼ −3.9 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 721 reviews

TrueGG, all time
91.3%
Steam overall
89.1%
Japanese, all time
78.4%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 5.0% of all reviews. Their positive share is 64.9%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h43%141–2 h36%112–5 h71%515–10 h81%7310–20 h81%11420–50 h84%24150–100 h86%184100–200 h83%151200+ h88%145Positive share by playtime0–1 h1443%1–2 h1136%2–5 h5171%5–10 h7381%10–20 h11481%20–50 h24184%50–100 h18486%100–200 h15183%200+ h14588%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h42.9%—14
1–2 h36.4%—11
2–5 h70.6%0.0%51
5–10 h80.8%—73
10–20 h80.7%—114
20–50 h84.2%100.0%241
50–100 h85.9%—184
100–200 h83.4%50.0%151
200+ h87.6%50.0%145

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 56% had 20+ hours and 17% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Going Medieval has a TrueGG Rating of 85.2%: the positive share among 721 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours, close to Steam's overall 89.1%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 91.3%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 5% of the total, and only 65% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs, 未完成・手抜き (less than at launch), and boredom. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels and 難易度.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 78.4%, 6.7 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (88.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs, Unfinished / low effort). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Crashes & bugs21% of negative reviews (9% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · ongoing since launch · 15 positive reviews say it improved
  • Unfinished / low effort14% of negative reviews (7% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · less than at launch · 7 positive reviews say it improved
  • Boring / repetitive12% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Movement & pacing11% of negative reviews (7% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch · 10 positive reviews say it improved
  • Controls, UI & camera10% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel41% of positive reviews (27% of negative)
  • Difficulty9% of positive reviews (6% of negative)
+ コンテンツ+ 物足+ 設計+ 注意+ 生活+ ロードマップ+ 村人+ 自由度− broken− terrible− waste− dev− unfinished− shallow− sense− waiting

Counted from 370 recent negative and 555 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating89.1%All time, all languages · 21,546 reviews
Adjusted rating88.0%Weighted by trust (95% range 87.6%–88.4%), −1.0pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews78.5%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−10.6pt vs overall) · 325 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review2%11%
Very short text32%6%
Key activated outside Steam24%19%
Received for free1%0%
Owns very few games11%5%
Over 100 reviews written4%7%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.790.88

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 58.1 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 2021-06: +3,970 / −406 2021-07: +752 / −138 2021-08: +573 / −95 2021-09: +366 / −50 2021-10: +435 / −70 2021-11: +676 / −29 2021-12: +355 / −49 2022-01: +278 / −31 2022-02: +211 / −27 2022-03: +175 / −21 2022-04: +177 / −13 2022-05: +202 / −29 2022-06: +534 / −89 2022-07: +241 / −38 2022-08: +217 / −23 2022-09: +124 / −21 2022-10: +148 / −21 2022-11: +301 / −36 2022-12: +191 / −35 2023-01: +195 / −27 2023-02: +171 / −20 2023-03: +122 / −11 2023-04: +116 / −22 2023-05: +114 / −23 2023-06: +204 / −27 2023-07: +147 / −20 2023-08: +123 / −14 2023-09: +103 / −16 2023-10: +136 / −10 2023-11: +269 / −11 2023-12: +170 / −24 2024-01: +131 / −29 2024-02: +92 / −12 2024-03: +123 / −12 2024-04: +121 / −22 2024-05: +91 / −18 2024-06: +146 / −27 2024-07: +94 / −18 2024-08: +91 / −14 2024-09: +72 / −15 2024-10: +103 / −8 2024-11: +126 / −13 2024-12: +123 / −13 2025-01: +106 / −19 2025-02: +81 / −15 2025-03: +95 / −17 2025-04: +66 / −15 2025-05: +95 / −11 2025-06: +69 / −20 2025-07: +112 / −31 2025-08: +114 / −25 2025-09: +74 / −17 2025-10: +85 / −11 2025-11: +114 / −13 2025-12: +86 / −16 2026-01: +85 / −9 2026-02: +83 / −11 2026-03: +396 / −136 2026-04: +274 / −64 2026-05: +130 / −30 2026-06: +104 / −28 2026-07: +110 / −20 2026-08: +102 / −25 2026-09: +74 / −18 2026-10: +53 / −5 2021/062022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 87.6% 2025-11: update2026-03: update 2021-06: 90.7%2021-07: 84.5%2021-08: 85.8%2021-09: 88.0%2021-10: 86.1%2021-11: 95.9%2021-12: 87.9%2022-01: 90.0%2022-02: 88.7%2022-03: 89.3%2022-04: 93.2%2022-05: 87.4%2022-06: 85.7%2022-07: 86.4%2022-08: 90.4%2022-09: 85.5%2022-10: 87.6%2022-11: 89.3%2022-12: 84.5%2023-01: 87.8%2023-02: 89.5%2023-03: 91.7%2023-04: 84.1%2023-05: 83.2%2023-06: 88.3%2023-07: 88.0%2023-08: 89.8%2023-09: 86.6%2023-10: 93.2%2023-11: 96.1%2023-12: 87.6%2024-01: 81.9%2024-02: 88.5%2024-03: 91.1%2024-04: 84.6%2024-05: 83.5%2024-06: 84.4%2024-07: 83.9%2024-08: 86.7%2024-09: 82.8%2024-10: 92.8%2024-11: 90.6%2024-12: 90.4%2025-01: 84.8%2025-02: 84.4%2025-03: 84.8%2025-04: 81.5%2025-05: 89.6%2025-06: 77.5%2025-07: 78.3%2025-08: 82.0%2025-09: 81.3%2025-10: 88.5%2025-11: 89.8%2025-12: 84.3%2026-01: 90.4%2026-02: 88.3%2026-03: 74.4%2026-04: 81.1%2026-05: 81.3%2026-06: 78.8%2026-07: 84.6%2026-08: 80.3%2026-09: 80.4%2026-10: 91.4% 2021/062022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Updates and ratings before and after

DateAnnouncement2 months before → after
2026-03-17 Going Medieval is out now in 1.0! 89% → 81% (−8.2pt)
2025-11-10 Medieval Monday Talk #70 - Manage 2.0 85% → 87% (+2.2pt)

Picked automatically from the titles of Steam announcements by the developer (one per month, last 3 years, up to 10). The dotted lines mark those months. Before and after are the positive rates of the two months before and after (excluding the month itself); shown as "—" under 50 reviews or when the two months after are not complete. An update is not necessarily the cause of a change.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 2 4 6 8 2026-09-19: +1 / −0 2026-09-20: +3 / −2 2026-09-21: +1 / −0 2026-09-22: +3 / −0 2026-09-23: +2 / −1 2026-09-24: +1 / −1 2026-09-25: +2 / −0 2026-09-26: +2 / −0 2026-09-27: +4 / −0 2026-09-28: +1 / −0 2026-09-29: +0 / −1 2026-09-30: +4 / −0 2026-10-01: +0 / −0 2026-10-02: +2 / −0 2026-10-03: +5 / −0 2026-10-04: +2 / −1 2026-10-05: +1 / −0 2026-10-06: +1 / −0 2026-10-07: +2 / −0 2026-10-08: +3 / −0 2026-10-09: +3 / −1 2026-10-10: +7 / −1 2026-10-11: +4 / −0 2026-10-12: +3 / −1 2026-10-13: +1 / −0 2026-10-14: +5 / −1 2026-10-15: +2 / −0 2026-10-16: +3 / −0 2026-10-17: +3 / −0 2026-10-18: +6 / −0 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2021-063,97040690.7%
2021-0775213884.5%
2021-085739585.8%
2021-093665088.0%
2021-104357086.1%
2021-116762995.9%
2021-123554987.9%
2022-012783190.0%
2022-022112788.7%
2022-031752189.3%
2022-041771393.2%
2022-052022987.4%
2022-065348985.7%
2022-072413886.4%
2022-082172390.4%
2022-091242185.5%
2022-101482187.6%
2022-113013689.3%
2022-121913584.5%
2023-011952787.8%
2023-021712089.5%
2023-031221191.7%
2023-041162284.1%
2023-051142383.2%
2023-062042788.3%
2023-071472088.0%
2023-081231489.8%
2023-091031686.6%
2023-101361093.2%
2023-112691196.1%
2023-121702487.6%
2024-011312981.9%
2024-02921288.5%
2024-031231291.1%
2024-041212284.6%
2024-05911883.5%
2024-061462784.4%
2024-07941883.9%
2024-08911486.7%
2024-09721582.8%
2024-10103892.8%
2024-111261390.6%
2024-121231390.4%
2025-011061984.8%
2025-02811584.4%
2025-03951784.8%
2025-04661581.5%
2025-05951189.6%
2025-06692077.5%
2025-071123178.3%
2025-081142582.0%
2025-09741781.3%
2025-10851188.5%
2025-111141389.8%
2025-12861684.3%
2026-0185990.4%
2026-02831188.3%
2026-0339613674.4%
2026-042746481.1%
2026-051303081.3%
2026-061042878.8%
2026-071102084.6%
2026-081022580.3%
2026-09741880.4%
2026-1053591.4%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1910
2026-09-2032
2026-09-2110
2026-09-2230
2026-09-2321
2026-09-2411
2026-09-2520
2026-09-2620
2026-09-2740
2026-09-2810
2026-09-2901
2026-09-3040
2026-10-0100
2026-10-0220
2026-10-0350
2026-10-0421
2026-10-0510
2026-10-0610
2026-10-0720
2026-10-0830
2026-10-0931
2026-10-1071
2026-10-1140
2026-10-1231
2026-10-1310
2026-10-1451
2026-10-1520
2026-10-1630
2026-10-1730
2026-10-1860
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days84.9%126
Last 180 days82.4%982
All time89.1%21,546
Japanese, last 180 days55.6%9
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About