NieR Replicant ver.1.22474487139...
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played NieR Replicant ver.1.22474487139... rate it? TrueGG Rating 92.5%

Release date: Apr 23, 2021 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Think twice if you are

  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding
  • Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
  • Players who want a brisk pace

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
92.5%
▲ +4.2 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 901 reviews

TrueGG, all time
93.4%
Steam overall
88.3%
Japanese, all time
84.6%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 8.3% of all reviews. Their positive share is 64.7%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h73%151–2 h43%142–5 h81%535–10 h69%5910–20 h72%15520–50 h90%54650–100 h96%312100–200 h95%42200+ h100%1Positive share by playtime0–1 h1573%1–2 h1443%2–5 h5381%5–10 h5969%10–20 h15572%20–50 h54690%50–100 h31296%100–200 h4295%200+ h1100%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h73.3%—15
1–2 h42.9%—14
2–5 h81.1%—53
5–10 h69.5%0.0%59
10–20 h71.6%66.7%155
20–50 h90.1%80.0%546
50–100 h96.2%66.7%312
100–200 h95.2%—42
200+ h100.0%—1

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 58% had 20+ hours and 3% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

NieR Replicant ver.1.22474487139... has a TrueGG Rating of 92.5%: the positive share among 901 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours, close to Steam's overall 88.3%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 93.4%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 8% of the total, and only 65% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

Negative reviews most often mention grind (more than at launch), boredom (more than at launch), and pacing (more than at launch).

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 84.6%, 7.9 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (87.9% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Grind, Boring / repetitive, Movement & pacing, Controls, UI & camera). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Grind30% of negative reviews (17% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch · 9 positive reviews say it improved
  • Boring / repetitive30% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
  • Movement & pacing18% of negative reviews (10% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch
  • Crashes & bugs8% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · less than at launch
  • Controls, UI & camera8% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

No standout topics

+ 是非+ peak+ 不便+ 感覚+ 視点+ 実績+ 全部+ 素晴− forced− repeat− desert− attack− running− annoying− couldn't− youtube

Counted from 387 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating88.3%All time, all languages · 28,628 reviews
Adjusted rating87.9%Weighted by trust (95% range 87.5%–88.3%), −0.3pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews79.5%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−8.7pt vs overall) · 425 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review2%10%
Very short text24%11%
Key activated outside Steam26%20%
Received for free0%1%
Owns very few games7%3%
Over 100 reviews written7%12%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.820.85

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 32.6 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 2021-04: +3,989 / −830 2021-05: +2,487 / −281 2021-06: +674 / −80 2021-07: +628 / −94 2021-08: +285 / −37 2021-09: +208 / −24 2021-10: +454 / −59 2021-11: +1,345 / −40 2021-12: +366 / −35 2022-01: +386 / −40 2022-02: +153 / −13 2022-03: +304 / −68 2022-04: +275 / −48 2022-05: +303 / −47 2022-06: +220 / −48 2022-07: +272 / −44 2022-08: +172 / −15 2022-09: +159 / −30 2022-10: +145 / −29 2022-11: +162 / −20 2022-12: +187 / −46 2023-01: +271 / −18 2023-02: +152 / −24 2023-03: +211 / −30 2023-04: +192 / −21 2023-05: +223 / −36 2023-06: +135 / −23 2023-07: +237 / −38 2023-08: +147 / −31 2023-09: +113 / −23 2023-10: +95 / −20 2023-11: +104 / −5 2023-12: +189 / −36 2024-01: +214 / −29 2024-02: +124 / −22 2024-03: +170 / −40 2024-04: +160 / −18 2024-05: +163 / −29 2024-06: +98 / −13 2024-07: +174 / −23 2024-08: +138 / −21 2024-09: +132 / −26 2024-10: +142 / −22 2024-11: +102 / −13 2024-12: +165 / −21 2025-01: +174 / −20 2025-02: +152 / −18 2025-03: +150 / −20 2025-04: +130 / −21 2025-05: +143 / −36 2025-06: +153 / −19 2025-07: +176 / −32 2025-08: +181 / −40 2025-09: +135 / −23 2025-10: +132 / −20 2025-11: +118 / −14 2025-12: +166 / −20 2026-01: +168 / −13 2026-02: +132 / −20 2026-03: +162 / −25 2026-04: +152 / −20 2026-05: +141 / −20 2026-06: +119 / −12 2026-07: +144 / −20 2026-08: +140 / −19 2026-09: +94 / −23 2026-10: +123 / −16 2021/042022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 87.2% 2021-04: 82.8%2021-05: 89.8%2021-06: 89.4%2021-07: 87.0%2021-08: 88.5%2021-09: 89.7%2021-10: 88.5%2021-11: 97.1%2021-12: 91.3%2022-01: 90.6%2022-02: 92.2%2022-03: 81.7%2022-04: 85.1%2022-05: 86.6%2022-06: 82.1%2022-07: 86.1%2022-08: 92.0%2022-09: 84.1%2022-10: 83.3%2022-11: 89.0%2022-12: 80.3%2023-01: 93.8%2023-02: 86.4%2023-03: 87.6%2023-04: 90.1%2023-05: 86.1%2023-06: 85.4%2023-07: 86.2%2023-08: 82.6%2023-09: 83.1%2023-10: 82.6%2023-11: 95.4%2023-12: 84.0%2024-01: 88.1%2024-02: 84.9%2024-03: 81.0%2024-04: 89.9%2024-05: 84.9%2024-06: 88.3%2024-07: 88.3%2024-08: 86.8%2024-09: 83.5%2024-10: 86.6%2024-11: 88.7%2024-12: 88.7%2025-01: 89.7%2025-02: 89.4%2025-03: 88.2%2025-04: 86.1%2025-05: 79.9%2025-06: 89.0%2025-07: 84.6%2025-08: 81.9%2025-09: 85.4%2025-10: 86.8%2025-11: 89.4%2025-12: 89.2%2026-01: 92.8%2026-02: 86.8%2026-03: 86.6%2026-04: 88.4%2026-05: 87.6%2026-06: 90.8%2026-07: 87.8%2026-08: 88.1%2026-09: 80.3%2026-10: 88.5% 2021/042022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 5 10 15 2026-09-19: +7 / −0 2026-09-20: +2 / −0 2026-09-21: +6 / −1 2026-09-22: +2 / −1 2026-09-23: +2 / −2 2026-09-24: +4 / −0 2026-09-25: +3 / −2 2026-09-26: +4 / −2 2026-09-27: +8 / −1 2026-09-28: +6 / −3 2026-09-29: +5 / −1 2026-09-30: +2 / −2 2026-10-01: +9 / −0 2026-10-02: +6 / −1 2026-10-03: +8 / −3 2026-10-04: +8 / −0 2026-10-05: +7 / −2 2026-10-06: +10 / −0 2026-10-07: +6 / −0 2026-10-08: +5 / −0 2026-10-09: +4 / −1 2026-10-10: +8 / −3 2026-10-11: +8 / −4 2026-10-12: +5 / −0 2026-10-13: +7 / −1 2026-10-14: +4 / −0 2026-10-15: +8 / −0 2026-10-16: +13 / −1 2026-10-17: +5 / −0 2026-10-18: +2 / −0 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2021-043,98983082.8%
2021-052,48728189.8%
2021-066748089.4%
2021-076289487.0%
2021-082853788.5%
2021-092082489.7%
2021-104545988.5%
2021-111,3454097.1%
2021-123663591.3%
2022-013864090.6%
2022-021531392.2%
2022-033046881.7%
2022-042754885.1%
2022-053034786.6%
2022-062204882.1%
2022-072724486.1%
2022-081721592.0%
2022-091593084.1%
2022-101452983.3%
2022-111622089.0%
2022-121874680.3%
2023-012711893.8%
2023-021522486.4%
2023-032113087.6%
2023-041922190.1%
2023-052233686.1%
2023-061352385.4%
2023-072373886.2%
2023-081473182.6%
2023-091132383.1%
2023-10952082.6%
2023-11104595.4%
2023-121893684.0%
2024-012142988.1%
2024-021242284.9%
2024-031704081.0%
2024-041601889.9%
2024-051632984.9%
2024-06981388.3%
2024-071742388.3%
2024-081382186.8%
2024-091322683.5%
2024-101422286.6%
2024-111021388.7%
2024-121652188.7%
2025-011742089.7%
2025-021521889.4%
2025-031502088.2%
2025-041302186.1%
2025-051433679.9%
2025-061531989.0%
2025-071763284.6%
2025-081814081.9%
2025-091352385.4%
2025-101322086.8%
2025-111181489.4%
2025-121662089.2%
2026-011681392.8%
2026-021322086.8%
2026-031622586.6%
2026-041522088.4%
2026-051412087.6%
2026-061191290.8%
2026-071442087.8%
2026-081401988.1%
2026-09942380.3%
2026-101231688.5%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1970
2026-09-2020
2026-09-2161
2026-09-2221
2026-09-2322
2026-09-2440
2026-09-2532
2026-09-2642
2026-09-2781
2026-09-2863
2026-09-2951
2026-09-3022
2026-10-0190
2026-10-0261
2026-10-0383
2026-10-0480
2026-10-0572
2026-10-06100
2026-10-0760
2026-10-0850
2026-10-0941
2026-10-1083
2026-10-1184
2026-10-1250
2026-10-1371
2026-10-1440
2026-10-1580
2026-10-16131
2026-10-1750
2026-10-1820
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days84.4%256
Last 180 days87.3%1,195
All time88.3%28,628
Japanese, last 180 days70.0%20
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About