Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Yakuza: Like a Dragon rate it? TrueGG Rating 92.6%

Release date: Nov 10, 2020 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Good for

  • Players who want dozens of hours of play

Think twice if you are

  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding
  • Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
  • Players who want a brisk pace

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
92.6%
▼ −1.3 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 1,222 reviews

TrueGG, all time
95.5%
Steam overall
94.0%
Japanese, all time
89.9%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 2.4% of all reviews. Their positive share is 72.4%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h64%251–2 h43%142–5 h84%635–10 h80%10710–20 h87%14320–50 h87%38950–100 h95%594100–200 h97%216200+ h91%23Positive share by playtime0–1 h2564%1–2 h1443%2–5 h6384%5–10 h10780%10–20 h14387%20–50 h38987%50–100 h59495%100–200 h21697%200+ h2391%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h64.0%0.0%25
1–2 h42.9%100.0%14
2–5 h84.1%0.0%63
5–10 h80.4%66.7%107
10–20 h86.7%100.0%143
20–50 h87.1%100.0%389
50–100 h94.8%100.0%594
100–200 h96.8%85.7%216
200+ h91.3%100.0%23

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 73% had 20+ hours and 13% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Yakuza: Like a Dragon has a TrueGG Rating of 92.6%: the positive share among 1,222 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours, close to Steam's overall 94.0%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 95.5%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 2% of the total, and only 72% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

In the last 180 days, reviews at 20–50h are 87% positive versus 97% at 100–200h: the more people play, the more they like it.

Negative reviews most often mention grind, boredom, and pacing. Positive reviews praise 前作・シリーズ.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 89.9%, similar to all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (94.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Grind, Boring / repetitive, Movement & pacing, Difficulty). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Grind24% of negative reviews (7% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Boring / repetitive22% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Movement & pacing14% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · ongoing since launch
  • Difficulty9% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Crashes & bugs7% of negative reviews (1% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · less than at launch

+ What players praise

  • Compared with earlier entries21% of positive reviews (13% of negative)
+ 素晴+ 正直+ peak+ ボリューム+ 装備+ ファン+ 一人+ 場面− denuvo− terrible− boring− complete− until− decided− continue− walking

Counted from 368 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating94.0%All time, all languages · 37,769 reviews
Adjusted rating94.0%Weighted by trust (95% range 93.8%–94.1%), ±0.0pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews86.6%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−7.4pt vs overall) · 508 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review1%12%
Very short text24%11%
Key activated outside Steam25%28%
Received for free1%1%
Owns very few games5%3%
Over 100 reviews written8%13%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.830.83

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 50.5 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 2020-11: +2,771 / −56 2020-12: +1,224 / −45 2021-01: +916 / −26 2021-02: +573 / −32 2021-03: +849 / −38 2021-04: +428 / −9 2021-05: +931 / −53 2021-06: +452 / −22 2021-07: +739 / −29 2021-08: +330 / −18 2021-09: +324 / −19 2021-10: +352 / −20 2021-11: +328 / −13 2021-12: +402 / −38 2022-01: +392 / −24 2022-02: +354 / −17 2022-03: +236 / −17 2022-04: +199 / −14 2022-05: +124 / −9 2022-06: +191 / −9 2022-07: +456 / −33 2022-08: +192 / −17 2022-09: +165 / −11 2022-10: +407 / −27 2022-11: +326 / −24 2022-12: +383 / −48 2023-01: +516 / −39 2023-02: +362 / −21 2023-03: +326 / −18 2023-04: +260 / −23 2023-05: +401 / −31 2023-06: +226 / −11 2023-07: +460 / −35 2023-08: +251 / −15 2023-09: +470 / −35 2023-10: +355 / −21 2023-11: +419 / −40 2023-12: +525 / −49 2024-01: +671 / −52 2024-02: +787 / −64 2024-03: +556 / −53 2024-04: +326 / −21 2024-05: +342 / −42 2024-06: +203 / −24 2024-07: +269 / −40 2024-08: +242 / −24 2024-09: +221 / −25 2024-10: +222 / −25 2024-11: +296 / −34 2024-12: +311 / −27 2025-01: +332 / −28 2025-02: +274 / −29 2025-03: +291 / −28 2025-04: +190 / −15 2025-05: +223 / −26 2025-06: +162 / −20 2025-07: +235 / −24 2025-08: +169 / −20 2025-09: +188 / −18 2025-10: +266 / −38 2025-11: +223 / −24 2025-12: +297 / −27 2026-01: +277 / −17 2026-02: +187 / −28 2026-03: +174 / −15 2026-04: +151 / −13 2026-05: +186 / −22 2026-06: +206 / −33 2026-07: +176 / −15 2026-08: +182 / −16 2026-09: +147 / −12 2026-10: +98 / −7 2020/112021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 93.5% 2020-11: 98.0%2020-12: 96.5%2021-01: 97.2%2021-02: 94.7%2021-03: 95.7%2021-04: 97.9%2021-05: 94.6%2021-06: 95.4%2021-07: 96.2%2021-08: 94.8%2021-09: 94.5%2021-10: 94.6%2021-11: 96.2%2021-12: 91.4%2022-01: 94.2%2022-02: 95.4%2022-03: 93.3%2022-04: 93.4%2022-05: 93.2%2022-06: 95.5%2022-07: 93.3%2022-08: 91.9%2022-09: 93.8%2022-10: 93.8%2022-11: 93.1%2022-12: 88.9%2023-01: 93.0%2023-02: 94.5%2023-03: 94.8%2023-04: 91.9%2023-05: 92.8%2023-06: 95.4%2023-07: 92.9%2023-08: 94.4%2023-09: 93.1%2023-10: 94.4%2023-11: 91.3%2023-12: 91.5%2024-01: 92.8%2024-02: 92.5%2024-03: 91.3%2024-04: 93.9%2024-05: 89.1%2024-06: 89.4%2024-07: 87.1%2024-08: 91.0%2024-09: 89.8%2024-10: 89.9%2024-11: 89.7%2024-12: 92.0%2025-01: 92.2%2025-02: 90.4%2025-03: 91.2%2025-04: 92.7%2025-05: 89.6%2025-06: 89.0%2025-07: 90.7%2025-08: 89.4%2025-09: 91.3%2025-10: 87.5%2025-11: 90.3%2025-12: 91.7%2026-01: 94.2%2026-02: 87.0%2026-03: 92.1%2026-04: 92.1%2026-05: 89.4%2026-06: 86.2%2026-07: 92.1%2026-08: 91.9%2026-09: 92.5%2026-10: 93.3% 2020/112021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 5 10 2026-09-19: +5 / −0 2026-09-20: +5 / −0 2026-09-21: +3 / −0 2026-09-22: +6 / −1 2026-09-23: +3 / −0 2026-09-24: +1 / −0 2026-09-25: +3 / −0 2026-09-26: +8 / −0 2026-09-27: +7 / −0 2026-09-28: +6 / −0 2026-09-29: +7 / −0 2026-09-30: +2 / −0 2026-10-01: +5 / −0 2026-10-02: +4 / −0 2026-10-03: +8 / −0 2026-10-04: +4 / −1 2026-10-05: +1 / −1 2026-10-06: +2 / −0 2026-10-07: +10 / −0 2026-10-08: +5 / −0 2026-10-09: +4 / −0 2026-10-10: +9 / −1 2026-10-11: +8 / −1 2026-10-12: +3 / −0 2026-10-13: +8 / −1 2026-10-14: +6 / −0 2026-10-15: +2 / −1 2026-10-16: +3 / −1 2026-10-17: +9 / −0 2026-10-18: +7 / −0 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2020-112,7715698.0%
2020-121,2244596.5%
2021-019162697.2%
2021-025733294.7%
2021-038493895.7%
2021-04428997.9%
2021-059315394.6%
2021-064522295.4%
2021-077392996.2%
2021-083301894.8%
2021-093241994.5%
2021-103522094.6%
2021-113281396.2%
2021-124023891.4%
2022-013922494.2%
2022-023541795.4%
2022-032361793.3%
2022-041991493.4%
2022-05124993.2%
2022-06191995.5%
2022-074563393.3%
2022-081921791.9%
2022-091651193.8%
2022-104072793.8%
2022-113262493.1%
2022-123834888.9%
2023-015163993.0%
2023-023622194.5%
2023-033261894.8%
2023-042602391.9%
2023-054013192.8%
2023-062261195.4%
2023-074603592.9%
2023-082511594.4%
2023-094703593.1%
2023-103552194.4%
2023-114194091.3%
2023-125254991.5%
2024-016715292.8%
2024-027876492.5%
2024-035565391.3%
2024-043262193.9%
2024-053424289.1%
2024-062032489.4%
2024-072694087.1%
2024-082422491.0%
2024-092212589.8%
2024-102222589.9%
2024-112963489.7%
2024-123112792.0%
2025-013322892.2%
2025-022742990.4%
2025-032912891.2%
2025-041901592.7%
2025-052232689.6%
2025-061622089.0%
2025-072352490.7%
2025-081692089.4%
2025-091881891.3%
2025-102663887.5%
2025-112232490.3%
2025-122972791.7%
2026-012771794.2%
2026-021872887.0%
2026-031741592.1%
2026-041511392.1%
2026-051862289.4%
2026-062063386.2%
2026-071761592.1%
2026-081821691.9%
2026-091471292.5%
2026-1098793.3%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1950
2026-09-2050
2026-09-2130
2026-09-2261
2026-09-2330
2026-09-2410
2026-09-2530
2026-09-2680
2026-09-2770
2026-09-2860
2026-09-2970
2026-09-3020
2026-10-0150
2026-10-0240
2026-10-0380
2026-10-0441
2026-10-0511
2026-10-0620
2026-10-07100
2026-10-0850
2026-10-0940
2026-10-1091
2026-10-1181
2026-10-1230
2026-10-1381
2026-10-1460
2026-10-1521
2026-10-1631
2026-10-1790
2026-10-1870
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days92.1%215
Last 180 days90.0%1,569
All time94.0%37,769
Japanese, last 180 days84.0%25
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About