Battlefield 4
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Battlefield 4 rate it? TrueGG Rating 89.5%

Release date: Jun 11, 2020 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Good for

  • Players willing to push through a slow start

Think twice if you are

  • Players who judge a game in the first hours (early ratings are lower)
  • Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
  • Players relying on Japanese (Japanese reviews rate it lower)

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
89.5%
▲ +4.7 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 10+ hours (last 180 days) · 2,056 reviews

TrueGG, all time
91.5%
Steam overall
84.8%
Japanese, all time
81.9%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 8.1% of all reviews. Their positive share is 51.0%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (10h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 10 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h51%1601–2 h45%1562–5 h74%8575–10 h84%1,25410–20 h89%83120–50 h90%56450–100 h91%298100–200 h89%185200+ h92%178Positive share by playtime0–1 h16051%1–2 h15645%2–5 h85774%5–10 h1,25484%10–20 h83189%20–50 h56490%50–100 h29891%100–200 h18589%200+ h17892%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h51.3%—160
1–2 h44.9%—156
2–5 h74.2%100.0%857
5–10 h83.7%0.0%1,254
10–20 h88.6%100.0%831
20–50 h89.9%100.0%564
50–100 h90.9%100.0%298
100–200 h88.6%—185
200+ h91.6%—178

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 33% had 20+ hours and 8% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Battlefield 4 has a TrueGG Rating of 89.5%: the positive share among 2,056 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 10+ hours, close to Steam's overall 84.8%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 91.5%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 8% of the total, and only 51% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

In the last 180 days, reviews at 2–5h are 74% positive versus 91% at 50–100h: the more people play, the more they like it.

Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs (more than at launch) and cheaters (less than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels and performance.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 81.9%, 7.6 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (83.6% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Crashes & bugs29% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
  • Cheaters8% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · less than at launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel20% of positive reviews (9% of negative)
  • Performance8% of positive reviews (4% of negative)
+ シリーズ+ 年前+ 普通+ 現代戦+ 人口+ ロッカー+ 作品+ 面白− worst− fix− bought− unplayable− terrible− swim− unless− trash

Counted from 394 recent negative and 547 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating84.8%All time, all languages · 82,298 reviews
Adjusted rating83.6%Weighted by trust (95% range 83.0%–84.1%), −1.3pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews72.4%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−12.4pt vs overall) · 341 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review4%18%
Very short text45%17%
Key activated outside Steam11%6%
Received for free2%1%
Owns very few games13%10%
Over 100 reviews written2%4%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.760.83

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 10.4 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 2020-06: +664 / −148 2020-07: +363 / −52 2020-08: +765 / −189 2020-09: +233 / −36 2020-10: +1,578 / −405 2020-11: +1,479 / −110 2020-12: +1,126 / −138 2021-01: +908 / −110 2021-02: +959 / −165 2021-03: +548 / −63 2021-04: +1,123 / −211 2021-05: +659 / −105 2021-06: +2,951 / −446 2021-07: +2,148 / −290 2021-08: +3,566 / −578 2021-09: +1,408 / −193 2021-10: +3,522 / −633 2021-11: +1,934 / −175 2021-12: +1,187 / −153 2022-01: +1,178 / −171 2022-02: +999 / −141 2022-03: +846 / −148 2022-04: +551 / −70 2022-05: +653 / −109 2022-06: +551 / −78 2022-07: +753 / −121 2022-08: +563 / −101 2022-09: +627 / −101 2022-10: +471 / −65 2022-11: +908 / −119 2022-12: +1,295 / −213 2023-01: +1,070 / −185 2023-02: +558 / −103 2023-03: +476 / −93 2023-04: +569 / −113 2023-05: +485 / −107 2023-06: +384 / −69 2023-07: +526 / −92 2023-08: +424 / −100 2023-09: +259 / −59 2023-10: +579 / −113 2023-11: +644 / −131 2023-12: +571 / −171 2024-01: +596 / −130 2024-02: +706 / −205 2024-03: +576 / −125 2024-04: +339 / −79 2024-05: +473 / −138 2024-06: +371 / −97 2024-07: +817 / −231 2024-08: +492 / −147 2024-09: +345 / −106 2024-10: +359 / −67 2024-11: +771 / −246 2024-12: +832 / −262 2025-01: +684 / −177 2025-02: +1,150 / −389 2025-03: +1,043 / −320 2025-04: +535 / −102 2025-05: +916 / −299 2025-06: +694 / −227 2025-07: +932 / −255 2025-08: +1,403 / −463 2025-09: +401 / −76 2025-10: +429 / −87 2025-11: +340 / −68 2025-12: +256 / −41 2026-01: +276 / −61 2026-02: +194 / −41 2026-03: +1,187 / −316 2026-04: +722 / −177 2026-05: +862 / −181 2026-06: +567 / −146 2026-07: +599 / −137 2026-08: +451 / −99 2026-09: +408 / −86 2026-10: +232 / −53 2020/062021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 83.6% 2020-06: 81.8%2020-07: 87.5%2020-08: 80.2%2020-09: 86.6%2020-10: 79.6%2020-11: 93.1%2020-12: 89.1%2021-01: 89.2%2021-02: 85.3%2021-03: 89.7%2021-04: 84.2%2021-05: 86.3%2021-06: 86.9%2021-07: 88.1%2021-08: 86.1%2021-09: 87.9%2021-10: 84.8%2021-11: 91.7%2021-12: 88.6%2022-01: 87.3%2022-02: 87.6%2022-03: 85.1%2022-04: 88.7%2022-05: 85.7%2022-06: 87.6%2022-07: 86.2%2022-08: 84.8%2022-09: 86.1%2022-10: 87.9%2022-11: 88.4%2022-12: 85.9%2023-01: 85.3%2023-02: 84.4%2023-03: 83.7%2023-04: 83.4%2023-05: 81.9%2023-06: 84.8%2023-07: 85.1%2023-08: 80.9%2023-09: 81.4%2023-10: 83.7%2023-11: 83.1%2023-12: 77.0%2024-01: 82.1%2024-02: 77.5%2024-03: 82.2%2024-04: 81.1%2024-05: 77.4%2024-06: 79.3%2024-07: 78.0%2024-08: 77.0%2024-09: 76.5%2024-10: 84.3%2024-11: 75.8%2024-12: 76.1%2025-01: 79.4%2025-02: 74.7%2025-03: 76.5%2025-04: 84.0%2025-05: 75.4%2025-06: 75.4%2025-07: 78.5%2025-08: 75.2%2025-09: 84.1%2025-10: 83.1%2025-11: 83.3%2025-12: 86.2%2026-01: 81.9%2026-02: 82.6%2026-03: 79.0%2026-04: 80.3%2026-05: 82.6%2026-06: 79.5%2026-07: 81.4%2026-08: 82.0%2026-09: 82.6%2026-10: 81.4% 2020/062021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 10 20 30 40 2026-09-20: +25 / −6 2026-09-21: +12 / −4 2026-09-22: +20 / −1 2026-09-23: +12 / −2 2026-09-24: +11 / −4 2026-09-25: +18 / −7 2026-09-26: +24 / −4 2026-09-27: +21 / −3 2026-09-28: +14 / −0 2026-09-29: +15 / −5 2026-09-30: +7 / −0 2026-10-01: +14 / −3 2026-10-02: +12 / −0 2026-10-03: +17 / −8 2026-10-04: +20 / −4 2026-10-05: +15 / −1 2026-10-06: +15 / −1 2026-10-07: +10 / −2 2026-10-08: +12 / −6 2026-10-09: +16 / −1 2026-10-10: +15 / −2 2026-10-11: +13 / −3 2026-10-12: +12 / −4 2026-10-13: +10 / −1 2026-10-14: +12 / −5 2026-10-15: +5 / −4 2026-10-16: +10 / −0 2026-10-17: +16 / −6 2026-10-18: +8 / −2 2026-10-19: +0 / −0 09/2009/2710/0410/1110/18
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2020-0666414881.8%
2020-073635287.5%
2020-0876518980.2%
2020-092333686.6%
2020-101,57840579.6%
2020-111,47911093.1%
2020-121,12613889.1%
2021-0190811089.2%
2021-0295916585.3%
2021-035486389.7%
2021-041,12321184.2%
2021-0565910586.3%
2021-062,95144686.9%
2021-072,14829088.1%
2021-083,56657886.1%
2021-091,40819387.9%
2021-103,52263384.8%
2021-111,93417591.7%
2021-121,18715388.6%
2022-011,17817187.3%
2022-0299914187.6%
2022-0384614885.1%
2022-045517088.7%
2022-0565310985.7%
2022-065517887.6%
2022-0775312186.2%
2022-0856310184.8%
2022-0962710186.1%
2022-104716587.9%
2022-1190811988.4%
2022-121,29521385.9%
2023-011,07018585.3%
2023-0255810384.4%
2023-034769383.7%
2023-0456911383.4%
2023-0548510781.9%
2023-063846984.8%
2023-075269285.1%
2023-0842410080.9%
2023-092595981.4%
2023-1057911383.7%
2023-1164413183.1%
2023-1257117177.0%
2024-0159613082.1%
2024-0270620577.5%
2024-0357612582.2%
2024-043397981.1%
2024-0547313877.4%
2024-063719779.3%
2024-0781723178.0%
2024-0849214777.0%
2024-0934510676.5%
2024-103596784.3%
2024-1177124675.8%
2024-1283226276.1%
2025-0168417779.4%
2025-021,15038974.7%
2025-031,04332076.5%
2025-0453510284.0%
2025-0591629975.4%
2025-0669422775.4%
2025-0793225578.5%
2025-081,40346375.2%
2025-094017684.1%
2025-104298783.1%
2025-113406883.3%
2025-122564186.2%
2026-012766181.9%
2026-021944182.6%
2026-031,18731679.0%
2026-0472217780.3%
2026-0586218182.6%
2026-0656714679.5%
2026-0759913781.4%
2026-084519982.0%
2026-094088682.6%
2026-102325381.4%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-20256
2026-09-21124
2026-09-22201
2026-09-23122
2026-09-24114
2026-09-25187
2026-09-26244
2026-09-27213
2026-09-28140
2026-09-29155
2026-09-3070
2026-10-01143
2026-10-02120
2026-10-03178
2026-10-04204
2026-10-05151
2026-10-06151
2026-10-07102
2026-10-08126
2026-10-09161
2026-10-10152
2026-10-11133
2026-10-12124
2026-10-13101
2026-10-14125
2026-10-1554
2026-10-16100
2026-10-17166
2026-10-1882
2026-10-1900
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days83.8%566
Last 180 days82.1%4,463
All time84.8%82,298
Japanese, last 180 days85.7%7
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About