Library Of Ruina
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Library Of Ruina rate it? TrueGG Rating 95.9%

Release date: Aug 10, 2021 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Good for

  • Players who want dozens of hours of play

Think twice if you are

  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding
  • Players particular about controls and UI

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
95.9%
▲ +1.4 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 50+ hours (last 180 days) · 2,194 reviews

TrueGG, all time
95.8%
Steam overall
94.5%
Japanese, all time
94.1%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 2.6% of all reviews. Their positive share is 70.1%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (50h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 50 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h66%411–2 h73%372–5 h96%3525–10 h96%44510–20 h93%60720–50 h94%92050–100 h96%935100–200 h96%968200+ h98%291Positive share by playtime0–1 h4166%1–2 h3773%2–5 h35296%5–10 h44596%10–20 h60793%20–50 h92094%50–100 h93596%100–200 h96896%200+ h29198%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h65.9%—41
1–2 h73.0%0.0%37
2–5 h95.7%100.0%352
5–10 h96.2%100.0%445
10–20 h92.8%—607
20–50 h93.8%90.0%920
50–100 h95.5%100.0%935
100–200 h95.7%100.0%968
200+ h97.6%90.9%291

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 50+ hours. 71% had 20+ hours and 32% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Library Of Ruina has a TrueGG Rating of 95.9%: the positive share among 2,194 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 50+ hours, close to Steam's overall 94.5%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 95.8%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 3% of the total, and only 70% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

Beyond the first hours, approval is fairly even across playtime.

Negative reviews most often mention graphics and music, grind, and boredom.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 94.1%, similar to all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (94.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Grind, Boring / repetitive, Controls, UI & camera). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Graphics & music14% of negative reviews (9% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players
  • Grind13% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players
  • Boring / repetitive8% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among under 2h players
  • Controls, UI & camera7% of negative reviews (0% of positive) · most common among under 2h players

+ What players praise

No standout topics

+ peak+ 体験+ 是非+ ネタバレ+ 都市+ 最高+ プロムン+ 注意− watch− issue− two− 初見殺− sex− mostly− librarians− levels

Counted from 368 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating94.5%All time, all languages · 45,811 reviews
Adjusted rating94.0%Weighted by trust (95% range 93.8%–94.2%), −0.5pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews91.9%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−2.6pt vs overall) · 834 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review3%10%
Very short text44%19%
Key activated outside Steam7%16%
Received for free2%2%
Owns very few games25%7%
Over 100 reviews written0%4%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.740.82

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 43.2 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2020-05: +1,408 / −172 2020-06: +450 / −53 2020-07: +341 / −39 2020-08: +301 / −29 2020-09: +289 / −41 2020-10: +177 / −17 2020-11: +535 / −29 2020-12: +353 / −22 2021-01: +381 / −39 2021-02: +455 / −26 2021-03: +271 / −25 2021-04: +1,099 / −211 2021-05: +453 / −27 2021-06: +428 / −25 2021-07: +454 / −28 2021-08: +591 / −49 2021-09: +304 / −22 2021-10: +317 / −22 2021-11: +825 / −27 2021-12: +360 / −17 2022-01: +372 / −14 2022-02: +318 / −14 2022-03: +318 / −10 2022-04: +272 / −10 2022-05: +319 / −17 2022-06: +408 / −21 2022-07: +482 / −20 2022-08: +377 / −15 2022-09: +353 / −21 2022-10: +366 / −26 2022-11: +563 / −18 2022-12: +579 / −27 2023-01: +634 / −25 2023-02: +496 / −22 2023-03: +601 / −47 2023-04: +447 / −25 2023-05: +465 / −32 2023-06: +570 / −28 2023-07: +1,048 / −221 2023-08: +530 / −53 2023-09: +472 / −30 2023-10: +421 / −15 2023-11: +580 / −24 2023-12: +421 / −19 2024-01: +438 / −22 2024-02: +442 / −12 2024-03: +435 / −13 2024-04: +350 / −17 2024-05: +407 / −20 2024-06: +506 / −14 2024-07: +476 / −16 2024-08: +519 / −19 2024-09: +536 / −10 2024-10: +552 / −26 2024-11: +894 / −32 2024-12: +788 / −37 2025-01: +839 / −39 2025-02: +568 / −18 2025-03: +612 / −26 2025-04: +496 / −23 2025-05: +449 / −25 2025-06: +552 / −29 2025-07: +832 / −39 2025-08: +598 / −30 2025-09: +432 / −22 2025-10: +702 / −38 2025-11: +661 / −32 2025-12: +563 / −18 2026-01: +669 / −35 2026-02: +566 / −24 2026-03: +719 / −44 2026-04: +599 / −35 2026-05: +537 / −35 2026-06: +612 / −35 2026-07: +1,043 / −69 2026-08: +703 / −39 2026-09: +443 / −34 2026-10: +494 / −28 2020/052021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 94.0% 2020-05: 89.1%2020-06: 89.5%2020-07: 89.7%2020-08: 91.2%2020-09: 87.6%2020-10: 91.2%2020-11: 94.9%2020-12: 94.1%2021-01: 90.7%2021-02: 94.6%2021-03: 91.6%2021-04: 83.9%2021-05: 94.4%2021-06: 94.5%2021-07: 94.2%2021-08: 92.3%2021-09: 93.3%2021-10: 93.5%2021-11: 96.8%2021-12: 95.5%2022-01: 96.4%2022-02: 95.8%2022-03: 97.0%2022-04: 96.5%2022-05: 94.9%2022-06: 95.1%2022-07: 96.0%2022-08: 96.2%2022-09: 94.4%2022-10: 93.4%2022-11: 96.9%2022-12: 95.5%2023-01: 96.2%2023-02: 95.8%2023-03: 92.7%2023-04: 94.7%2023-05: 93.6%2023-06: 95.3%2023-07: 82.6%2023-08: 90.9%2023-09: 94.0%2023-10: 96.6%2023-11: 96.0%2023-12: 95.7%2024-01: 95.2%2024-02: 97.4%2024-03: 97.1%2024-04: 95.4%2024-05: 95.3%2024-06: 97.3%2024-07: 96.7%2024-08: 96.5%2024-09: 98.2%2024-10: 95.5%2024-11: 96.5%2024-12: 95.5%2025-01: 95.6%2025-02: 96.9%2025-03: 95.9%2025-04: 95.6%2025-05: 94.7%2025-06: 95.0%2025-07: 95.5%2025-08: 95.2%2025-09: 95.2%2025-10: 94.9%2025-11: 95.4%2025-12: 96.9%2026-01: 95.0%2026-02: 95.9%2026-03: 94.2%2026-04: 94.5%2026-05: 93.9%2026-06: 94.6%2026-07: 93.8%2026-08: 94.7%2026-09: 92.9%2026-10: 94.6% 2020/052021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 20 40 60 2026-09-19: +13 / −1 2026-09-20: +14 / −2 2026-09-21: +10 / −0 2026-09-22: +18 / −2 2026-09-23: +22 / −1 2026-09-24: +15 / −0 2026-09-25: +12 / −1 2026-09-26: +15 / −1 2026-09-27: +16 / −2 2026-09-28: +17 / −0 2026-09-29: +14 / −1 2026-09-30: +10 / −1 2026-10-01: +12 / −0 2026-10-02: +37 / −0 2026-10-03: +38 / −1 2026-10-04: +46 / −3 2026-10-05: +38 / −6 2026-10-06: +36 / −1 2026-10-07: +20 / −1 2026-10-08: +27 / −0 2026-10-09: +21 / −1 2026-10-10: +28 / −2 2026-10-11: +35 / −1 2026-10-12: +18 / −1 2026-10-13: +16 / −4 2026-10-14: +30 / −2 2026-10-15: +13 / −2 2026-10-16: +29 / −2 2026-10-17: +33 / −0 2026-10-18: +17 / −1 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2020-051,40817289.1%
2020-064505389.5%
2020-073413989.7%
2020-083012991.2%
2020-092894187.6%
2020-101771791.2%
2020-115352994.9%
2020-123532294.1%
2021-013813990.7%
2021-024552694.6%
2021-032712591.6%
2021-041,09921183.9%
2021-054532794.4%
2021-064282594.5%
2021-074542894.2%
2021-085914992.3%
2021-093042293.3%
2021-103172293.5%
2021-118252796.8%
2021-123601795.5%
2022-013721496.4%
2022-023181495.8%
2022-033181097.0%
2022-042721096.5%
2022-053191794.9%
2022-064082195.1%
2022-074822096.0%
2022-083771596.2%
2022-093532194.4%
2022-103662693.4%
2022-115631896.9%
2022-125792795.5%
2023-016342596.2%
2023-024962295.8%
2023-036014792.7%
2023-044472594.7%
2023-054653293.6%
2023-065702895.3%
2023-071,04822182.6%
2023-085305390.9%
2023-094723094.0%
2023-104211596.6%
2023-115802496.0%
2023-124211995.7%
2024-014382295.2%
2024-024421297.4%
2024-034351397.1%
2024-043501795.4%
2024-054072095.3%
2024-065061497.3%
2024-074761696.7%
2024-085191996.5%
2024-095361098.2%
2024-105522695.5%
2024-118943296.5%
2024-127883795.5%
2025-018393995.6%
2025-025681896.9%
2025-036122695.9%
2025-044962395.6%
2025-054492594.7%
2025-065522995.0%
2025-078323995.5%
2025-085983095.2%
2025-094322295.2%
2025-107023894.9%
2025-116613295.4%
2025-125631896.9%
2026-016693595.0%
2026-025662495.9%
2026-037194494.2%
2026-045993594.5%
2026-055373593.9%
2026-066123594.6%
2026-071,0436993.8%
2026-087033994.7%
2026-094433492.9%
2026-104942894.6%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-19131
2026-09-20142
2026-09-21100
2026-09-22182
2026-09-23221
2026-09-24150
2026-09-25121
2026-09-26151
2026-09-27162
2026-09-28170
2026-09-29141
2026-09-30101
2026-10-01120
2026-10-02370
2026-10-03381
2026-10-04463
2026-10-05386
2026-10-06361
2026-10-07201
2026-10-08270
2026-10-09211
2026-10-10282
2026-10-11351
2026-10-12181
2026-10-13164
2026-10-14302
2026-10-15132
2026-10-16292
2026-10-17330
2026-10-18171
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days94.1%764
Last 180 days94.6%4,591
All time94.5%45,811
Japanese, last 180 days93.9%49
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About