Dead Space
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Dead Space rate it? TrueGG Rating 94.6%

Release date: Jan 27, 2023 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Good for

  • Players who want a good story and characters
  • Players who care about visuals and music

Think twice if you are

  • Players without a strong PC (reports of poor performance)
  • Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
  • Players relying on Japanese (Japanese reviews rate it lower)

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
94.6%
▲ +4.1 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 10+ hours (last 180 days) · 5,386 reviews

TrueGG, all time
95.1%
Steam overall
90.5%
Japanese, all time
87.8%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 10.7% of all reviews. Their positive share is 66.7%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (10h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 10 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h37%3981–2 h61%2312–5 h85%1,0135–10 h86%1,12210–20 h94%3,03720–50 h96%2,03550–100 h96%274100–200 h97%35200+ h100%5Positive share by playtime0–1 h39837%1–2 h23161%2–5 h1,01385%5–10 h1,12286%10–20 h3,03794%20–50 h2,03596%50–100 h27496%100–200 h3597%200+ h5100%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h37.2%0.0%398
1–2 h61.0%50.0%231
2–5 h85.1%50.0%1,013
5–10 h86.5%100.0%1,122
10–20 h93.5%86.7%3,037
20–50 h95.9%100.0%2,035
50–100 h96.4%100.0%274
100–200 h97.1%—35
200+ h100.0%—5

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 27% had 20+ hours and 1% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Dead Space has a TrueGG Rating of 94.6%: the positive share among 5,386 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 10+ hours, close to Steam's overall 90.5%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 95.1%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 11% of the total, and only 67% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

In the last 180 days, reviews at 2–5h are 85% positive versus 96% at 50–100h: the more people play, the more they like it.

Negative reviews most often mention performance, crashes and bugs, and boredom (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels, the story, and 前作・シリーズ.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 87.8%, 6.8 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (91.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Performance, Crashes & bugs). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Performance38% of negative reviews (10% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · ongoing since launch · 13 positive reviews say it improved
  • Crashes & bugs25% of negative reviews (9% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch · 13 positive reviews say it improved
  • Boring / repetitive10% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel30% of positive reviews (13% of negative)
  • Story19% of positive reviews (13% of negative)
  • Compared with earlier entries18% of positive reviews (13% of negative)
  • Graphics & music18% of positive reviews (10% of negative)
+ 強化+ キネシス+ バランス+ エンジニア+ エリア+ 工具+ 表現+ 当時− unplayable− crashes− enough− fixed− either− boring− stutter− mess

Counted from 377 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating90.5%All time, all languages · 72,023 reviews
Adjusted rating91.0%Weighted by trust (95% range 90.7%–91.3%), +0.5pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews81.6%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−8.9pt vs overall) · 418 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review3%30%
Very short text29%14%
Key activated outside Steam7%7%
Received for free1%1%
Owns very few games7%3%
Over 100 reviews written6%7%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.840.79

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 14.4 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 5,000 10k 15k 2023-01: +9,451 / −1,118 2023-02: +9,083 / −646 2023-03: +1,732 / −132 2023-04: +709 / −84 2023-05: +692 / −62 2023-06: +381 / −101 2023-07: +711 / −277 2023-08: +483 / −94 2023-09: +699 / −107 2023-10: +556 / −62 2023-11: +1,917 / −92 2023-12: +1,239 / −157 2024-01: +1,012 / −150 2024-02: +1,085 / −185 2024-03: +747 / −107 2024-04: +515 / −67 2024-05: +902 / −139 2024-06: +881 / −151 2024-07: +765 / −82 2024-08: +704 / −79 2024-09: +544 / −48 2024-10: +546 / −75 2024-11: +991 / −111 2024-12: +1,106 / −150 2025-01: +859 / −108 2025-02: +978 / −153 2025-03: +853 / −101 2025-04: +539 / −54 2025-05: +793 / −95 2025-06: +793 / −128 2025-07: +1,202 / −124 2025-08: +920 / −96 2025-09: +894 / −104 2025-10: +771 / −91 2025-11: +917 / −111 2025-12: +1,573 / −177 2026-01: +1,173 / −138 2026-02: +839 / −96 2026-03: +1,508 / −213 2026-04: +867 / −93 2026-05: +715 / −98 2026-06: +1,267 / −256 2026-07: +2,151 / −262 2026-08: +1,061 / −134 2026-09: +804 / −95 2026-10: +547 / −58 2023/012023/072024/012024/072025/012025/072026/012026/07

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 89.4% 2023-01: 89.4%2023-02: 93.4%2023-03: 92.9%2023-04: 89.4%2023-05: 91.8%2023-06: 79.0%2023-07: 72.0%2023-08: 83.7%2023-09: 86.7%2023-10: 90.0%2023-11: 95.4%2023-12: 88.8%2024-01: 87.1%2024-02: 85.4%2024-03: 87.5%2024-04: 88.5%2024-05: 86.6%2024-06: 85.4%2024-07: 90.3%2024-08: 89.9%2024-09: 91.9%2024-10: 87.9%2024-11: 89.9%2024-12: 88.1%2025-01: 88.8%2025-02: 86.5%2025-03: 89.4%2025-04: 90.9%2025-05: 89.3%2025-06: 86.1%2025-07: 90.6%2025-08: 90.6%2025-09: 89.6%2025-10: 89.4%2025-11: 89.2%2025-12: 89.9%2026-01: 89.5%2026-02: 89.7%2026-03: 87.6%2026-04: 90.3%2026-05: 87.9%2026-06: 83.2%2026-07: 89.1%2026-08: 88.8%2026-09: 89.4%2026-10: 90.4% 2023/012023/072024/012024/072025/012025/072026/012026/07

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 20 40 60 2026-09-20: +40 / −5 2026-09-21: +27 / −7 2026-09-22: +22 / −3 2026-09-23: +29 / −0 2026-09-24: +23 / −1 2026-09-25: +29 / −3 2026-09-26: +35 / −3 2026-09-27: +42 / −5 2026-09-28: +26 / −2 2026-09-29: +24 / −1 2026-09-30: +28 / −3 2026-10-01: +25 / −1 2026-10-02: +30 / −3 2026-10-03: +30 / −3 2026-10-04: +38 / −5 2026-10-05: +37 / −2 2026-10-06: +35 / −5 2026-10-07: +18 / −2 2026-10-08: +28 / −4 2026-10-09: +34 / −5 2026-10-10: +31 / −3 2026-10-11: +49 / −2 2026-10-12: +35 / −1 2026-10-13: +33 / −1 2026-10-14: +23 / −3 2026-10-15: +26 / −4 2026-10-16: +21 / −6 2026-10-17: +24 / −5 2026-10-18: +28 / −3 2026-10-19: +2 / −0 09/2009/2710/0410/1110/18
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2023-019,4511,11889.4%
2023-029,08364693.4%
2023-031,73213292.9%
2023-047098489.4%
2023-056926291.8%
2023-0638110179.0%
2023-0771127772.0%
2023-084839483.7%
2023-0969910786.7%
2023-105566290.0%
2023-111,9179295.4%
2023-121,23915788.8%
2024-011,01215087.1%
2024-021,08518585.4%
2024-0374710787.5%
2024-045156788.5%
2024-0590213986.6%
2024-0688115185.4%
2024-077658290.3%
2024-087047989.9%
2024-095444891.9%
2024-105467587.9%
2024-1199111189.9%
2024-121,10615088.1%
2025-0185910888.8%
2025-0297815386.5%
2025-0385310189.4%
2025-045395490.9%
2025-057939589.3%
2025-0679312886.1%
2025-071,20212490.6%
2025-089209690.6%
2025-0989410489.6%
2025-107719189.4%
2025-1191711189.2%
2025-121,57317789.9%
2026-011,17313889.5%
2026-028399689.7%
2026-031,50821387.6%
2026-048679390.3%
2026-057159887.9%
2026-061,26725683.2%
2026-072,15126289.1%
2026-081,06113488.8%
2026-098049589.4%
2026-105475890.4%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-20405
2026-09-21277
2026-09-22223
2026-09-23290
2026-09-24231
2026-09-25293
2026-09-26353
2026-09-27425
2026-09-28262
2026-09-29241
2026-09-30283
2026-10-01251
2026-10-02303
2026-10-03303
2026-10-04385
2026-10-05372
2026-10-06355
2026-10-07182
2026-10-08284
2026-10-09345
2026-10-10313
2026-10-11492
2026-10-12351
2026-10-13331
2026-10-14233
2026-10-15264
2026-10-16216
2026-10-17245
2026-10-18283
2026-10-1920
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days90.4%1,066
Last 180 days88.6%8,128
All time90.5%72,023
Japanese, last 180 days77.8%36
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About