ASTLIBRA Revision
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played ASTLIBRA Revision rate it? TrueGG Rating 97.2%

Release date: Oct 13, 2022 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Good for

  • Players who want dozens of hours of play
  • Players who care about visuals and music

Think twice if you are

  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding
  • Players who want a brisk pace
  • Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
97.2%
▲ +2.2 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 50+ hours (last 180 days) · 1,094 reviews

TrueGG, all time
98.6%
Steam overall
95.0%
Japanese, all time
98.0%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 1.9% of all reviews. Their positive share is 74.0%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (50h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 50 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h56%181–2 h64%142–5 h94%665–10 h77%11710–20 h78%17920–50 h85%50850–100 h97%887100–200 h99%193200+ h100%14Positive share by playtime0–1 h1856%1–2 h1464%2–5 h6694%5–10 h11777%10–20 h17978%20–50 h50885%50–100 h88797%100–200 h19399%200+ h14100%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h55.6%—18
1–2 h64.3%—14
2–5 h93.9%—66
5–10 h76.9%100.0%117
10–20 h78.2%100.0%179
20–50 h84.6%33.3%508
50–100 h96.6%96.7%887
100–200 h99.5%100.0%193
200+ h100.0%100.0%14

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 50+ hours. 80% had 20+ hours and 8% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

ASTLIBRA Revision has a TrueGG Rating of 97.2%: the positive share among 1,094 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 50+ hours, close to Steam's overall 95.0%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 98.6%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 2% of the total, and only 74% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

Negative reviews most often mention grind, pacing, and boredom. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels, graphics and music, and monetization and DLC.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 98.0%, similar to all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (94.6% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Grind, Movement & pacing, Boring / repetitive, Controls, UI & camera). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Grind24% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players
  • Movement & pacing20% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players
  • Boring / repetitive20% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among under 2h players
  • Updates & developers13% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players
  • Controls, UI & camera11% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel43% of positive reviews (25% of negative)
  • Graphics & music21% of positive reviews (10% of negative)
  • Monetization & DLC8% of positive reviews (2% of negative)
+ 外伝+ 最高+ 全実績解+ 収集+ 育成要素+ awesome+ rpgs+ amazing− understand− terrible− female− worst− women− overwhelmingly− animation− aren't

Counted from 221 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating95.0%All time, all languages · 32,173 reviews
Adjusted rating94.6%Weighted by trust (95% range 94.5%–94.8%), −0.3pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews93.2%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−1.8pt vs overall) · 737 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review0%7%
Very short text31%7%
Key activated outside Steam9%11%
Received for free0%0%
Owns very few games5%3%
Over 100 reviews written2%5%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.840.90

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 48.3 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 2022-10: +903 / −43 2022-11: +3,542 / −127 2022-12: +2,567 / −112 2023-01: +3,206 / −134 2023-02: +1,336 / −51 2023-03: +1,223 / −81 2023-04: +903 / −41 2023-05: +553 / −32 2023-06: +1,095 / −61 2023-07: +794 / −52 2023-08: +416 / −22 2023-09: +274 / −25 2023-10: +539 / −48 2023-11: +657 / −40 2023-12: +727 / −55 2024-01: +636 / −50 2024-02: +825 / −53 2024-03: +561 / −31 2024-04: +329 / −29 2024-05: +315 / −22 2024-06: +353 / −23 2024-07: +376 / −20 2024-08: +290 / −21 2024-09: +285 / −15 2024-10: +277 / −32 2024-11: +302 / −20 2024-12: +369 / −27 2025-01: +308 / −25 2025-02: +280 / −19 2025-03: +247 / −20 2025-04: +255 / −19 2025-05: +256 / −33 2025-06: +264 / −24 2025-07: +313 / −30 2025-08: +329 / −45 2025-09: +190 / −15 2025-10: +324 / −28 2025-11: +284 / −27 2025-12: +216 / −22 2026-01: +218 / −33 2026-02: +312 / −42 2026-03: +313 / −23 2026-04: +255 / −17 2026-05: +228 / −27 2026-06: +307 / −29 2026-07: +379 / −46 2026-08: +236 / −29 2026-09: +242 / −24 2026-10: +177 / −25 2022/102023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 94.1% 2023-12: update 2022-10: 95.5%2022-11: 96.5%2022-12: 95.8%2023-01: 96.0%2023-02: 96.3%2023-03: 93.8%2023-04: 95.7%2023-05: 94.5%2023-06: 94.7%2023-07: 93.9%2023-08: 95.0%2023-09: 91.6%2023-10: 91.8%2023-11: 94.3%2023-12: 93.0%2024-01: 92.7%2024-02: 94.0%2024-03: 94.8%2024-04: 91.9%2024-05: 93.5%2024-06: 93.9%2024-07: 94.9%2024-08: 93.2%2024-09: 95.0%2024-10: 89.6%2024-11: 93.8%2024-12: 93.2%2025-01: 92.5%2025-02: 93.6%2025-03: 92.5%2025-04: 93.1%2025-05: 88.6%2025-06: 91.7%2025-07: 91.3%2025-08: 88.0%2025-09: 92.7%2025-10: 92.0%2025-11: 91.3%2025-12: 90.8%2026-01: 86.9%2026-02: 88.1%2026-03: 93.2%2026-04: 93.8%2026-05: 89.4%2026-06: 91.4%2026-07: 89.2%2026-08: 89.1%2026-09: 91.0%2026-10: 87.6% 2022/102023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Updates and ratings before and after

DateAnnouncement2 months before → after
2023-12-26 ASTLIBRA Revision Gaiden: The Cave of Phantom Mist DLC 93% → 93% (+0.3pt)

Picked automatically from the titles of Steam announcements by the developer (one per month, last 3 years, up to 10). The dotted lines mark those months. Before and after are the positive rates of the two months before and after (excluding the month itself); shown as "—" under 50 reviews or when the two months after are not complete. An update is not necessarily the cause of a change.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 5 10 15 20 2026-09-19: +13 / −1 2026-09-20: +13 / −0 2026-09-21: +11 / −2 2026-09-22: +11 / −2 2026-09-23: +14 / −1 2026-09-24: +8 / −2 2026-09-25: +7 / −4 2026-09-26: +9 / −2 2026-09-27: +13 / −0 2026-09-28: +1 / −1 2026-09-29: +4 / −0 2026-09-30: +12 / −0 2026-10-01: +6 / −2 2026-10-02: +12 / −2 2026-10-03: +10 / −0 2026-10-04: +9 / −2 2026-10-05: +8 / −2 2026-10-06: +12 / −2 2026-10-07: +10 / −3 2026-10-08: +6 / −0 2026-10-09: +6 / −2 2026-10-10: +14 / −2 2026-10-11: +16 / −0 2026-10-12: +11 / −1 2026-10-13: +10 / −1 2026-10-14: +6 / −1 2026-10-15: +16 / −3 2026-10-16: +7 / −1 2026-10-17: +7 / −1 2026-10-18: +11 / −0 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2022-109034395.5%
2022-113,54212796.5%
2022-122,56711295.8%
2023-013,20613496.0%
2023-021,3365196.3%
2023-031,2238193.8%
2023-049034195.7%
2023-055533294.5%
2023-061,0956194.7%
2023-077945293.9%
2023-084162295.0%
2023-092742591.6%
2023-105394891.8%
2023-116574094.3%
2023-127275593.0%
2024-016365092.7%
2024-028255394.0%
2024-035613194.8%
2024-043292991.9%
2024-053152293.5%
2024-063532393.9%
2024-073762094.9%
2024-082902193.2%
2024-092851595.0%
2024-102773289.6%
2024-113022093.8%
2024-123692793.2%
2025-013082592.5%
2025-022801993.6%
2025-032472092.5%
2025-042551993.1%
2025-052563388.6%
2025-062642491.7%
2025-073133091.3%
2025-083294588.0%
2025-091901592.7%
2025-103242892.0%
2025-112842791.3%
2025-122162290.8%
2026-012183386.9%
2026-023124288.1%
2026-033132393.2%
2026-042551793.8%
2026-052282789.4%
2026-063072991.4%
2026-073794689.2%
2026-082362989.1%
2026-092422491.0%
2026-101772587.6%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-19131
2026-09-20130
2026-09-21112
2026-09-22112
2026-09-23141
2026-09-2482
2026-09-2574
2026-09-2692
2026-09-27130
2026-09-2811
2026-09-2940
2026-09-30120
2026-10-0162
2026-10-02122
2026-10-03100
2026-10-0492
2026-10-0582
2026-10-06122
2026-10-07103
2026-10-0860
2026-10-0962
2026-10-10142
2026-10-11160
2026-10-12111
2026-10-13101
2026-10-1461
2026-10-15163
2026-10-1671
2026-10-1771
2026-10-18110
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days88.8%366
Last 180 days90.4%1,994
All time95.0%32,173
Japanese, last 180 days93.8%48
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About