How do players who really played Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA Mega Mix+ rate it? TrueGG Rating 98.2%
Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours.
Good for
- Players who want fun from the first hours
Think twice if you are
- Players without a strong PC (reports of poor performance)
- Players buying on the promise of future updates (complaints about the developers)
A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How
vs Steam overall
Positive among players with 5+ hours (last 180 days) · 1,225 reviews
- TrueGG, all time
- 96.7%
- Steam overall
- 94.8%
- Japanese, all time
- 94.2%
Early wall
Reviews written under 2 hours: 14.3% of all reviews. Their positive share is 85.5%.
This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).
Does the rating change the longer people play?
Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.
Show chart values as a table
| Playtime | Positive | Japanese | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 h | 77.6% | — | 58 |
| 1–2 h | 90.0% | 100.0% | 80 |
| 2–5 h | 97.4% | 100.0% | 382 |
| 5–10 h | 96.5% | 100.0% | 315 |
| 10–20 h | 99.3% | 100.0% | 296 |
| 20–50 h | 98.3% | 100.0% | 293 |
| 50–100 h | 98.7% | 100.0% | 157 |
| 100–200 h | 97.8% | 100.0% | 91 |
| 200+ h | 100.0% | 100.0% | 73 |
How long people play: half of reviewers had played 5+ hours. 27% had 20+ hours and 6% had 100+ hours (all time).
Summary
Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA Mega Mix+ has a TrueGG Rating of 98.2%: the positive share among 1,225 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 5+ hours, close to Steam's overall 94.8%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 96.7%).
Reviews written under 2 hours make up 14% of the total, with 85% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.
Beyond the first hours, approval is fairly even across playtime.
Negative reviews most often mention performance (less than at launch), graphics and music, and crashes and bugs. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.
Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 94.2%, similar to all languages.
Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (94.7% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.
All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.
Why it is rated this way
Complaints center on technical quality (Performance, Crashes & bugs). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too.
− Most mentioned complaints
- Performance26% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · less than at launch
- Graphics & music13% of negative reviews (9% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · ongoing since launch
- Crashes & bugs11% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · ongoing since launch
- Updates & developers11% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · less than at launch
+ What players praise
- Fun & feel24% of positive reviews (14% of negative)
Counted from 363 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count
Checking the numbers
Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.
| Metric | Positive | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Official Steam rating | 94.8% | All time, all languages · 23,979 reviews |
| Adjusted rating | 94.7% | Weighted by trust (95% range 94.5%–94.9%), −0.1pt vs official |
| Japanese-language reviews | 89.8% | All time, Japanese-language reviews (−4.9pt vs overall) · 620 reviews |
Show the positive vs negative breakdown
Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.
| Condition | Positive reviews | Negative reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 hours played at review | 6% | 33% |
| Very short text | 36% | 13% |
| Key activated outside Steam | 21% | 20% |
| Received for free | 1% | 1% |
| Owns very few games | 20% | 6% |
| Over 100 reviews written | 2% | 6% |
| Average trust (1.0 = full) | 0.75 | 0.77 |
The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 15 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19
When did the rating change?
Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.
Reviews per month
Positive share per month
Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.
Reviews per day, last 30 days
Show monthly data as a table
| Month | Positive | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05 | 1,612 | 213 | 88.3% |
| 2022-06 | 1,725 | 207 | 89.3% |
| 2022-07 | 742 | 65 | 91.9% |
| 2022-08 | 416 | 49 | 89.5% |
| 2022-09 | 309 | 19 | 94.2% |
| 2022-10 | 363 | 27 | 93.1% |
| 2022-11 | 1,228 | 29 | 97.7% |
| 2022-12 | 436 | 25 | 94.6% |
| 2023-01 | 487 | 33 | 93.7% |
| 2023-02 | 219 | 19 | 92.0% |
| 2023-03 | 415 | 22 | 95.0% |
| 2023-04 | 217 | 14 | 93.9% |
| 2023-05 | 280 | 20 | 93.3% |
| 2023-06 | 203 | 15 | 93.1% |
| 2023-07 | 398 | 23 | 94.5% |
| 2023-08 | 175 | 12 | 93.6% |
| 2023-09 | 247 | 17 | 93.6% |
| 2023-10 | 148 | 11 | 93.1% |
| 2023-11 | 311 | 17 | 94.8% |
| 2023-12 | 373 | 17 | 95.6% |
| 2024-01 | 349 | 19 | 94.8% |
| 2024-02 | 326 | 21 | 93.9% |
| 2024-03 | 322 | 20 | 94.2% |
| 2024-04 | 256 | 8 | 97.0% |
| 2024-05 | 287 | 12 | 96.0% |
| 2024-06 | 244 | 14 | 94.6% |
| 2024-07 | 385 | 29 | 93.0% |
| 2024-08 | 184 | 7 | 96.3% |
| 2024-09 | 263 | 11 | 96.0% |
| 2024-10 | 193 | 4 | 98.0% |
| 2024-11 | 247 | 12 | 95.4% |
| 2024-12 | 388 | 17 | 95.8% |
| 2025-01 | 480 | 19 | 96.2% |
| 2025-02 | 364 | 19 | 95.0% |
| 2025-03 | 355 | 9 | 97.5% |
| 2025-04 | 247 | 8 | 96.9% |
| 2025-05 | 333 | 12 | 96.5% |
| 2025-06 | 264 | 10 | 96.4% |
| 2025-07 | 367 | 12 | 96.8% |
| 2025-08 | 232 | 13 | 94.7% |
| 2025-09 | 264 | 5 | 98.1% |
| 2025-10 | 239 | 8 | 96.8% |
| 2025-11 | 201 | 5 | 97.6% |
| 2025-12 | 473 | 12 | 97.5% |
| 2026-01 | 305 | 10 | 96.8% |
| 2026-02 | 293 | 10 | 96.7% |
| 2026-03 | 327 | 11 | 96.7% |
| 2026-04 | 201 | 9 | 95.7% |
| 2026-05 | 210 | 8 | 96.3% |
| 2026-06 | 197 | 8 | 96.1% |
| 2026-07 | 326 | 5 | 98.5% |
| 2026-08 | 257 | 5 | 98.1% |
| 2026-09 | 168 | 5 | 97.1% |
| 2026-10 | 156 | 11 | 93.4% |
Show daily data as a table
| Day | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 | 7 | 0 |
| 2026-09-20 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-09-21 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-09-22 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-09-23 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-09-24 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-09-25 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-09-26 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-27 | 10 | 0 |
| 2026-09-28 | 7 | 0 |
| 2026-09-29 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-30 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-01 | 5 | 0 |
| 2026-10-02 | 10 | 2 |
| 2026-10-03 | 12 | 2 |
| 2026-10-04 | 12 | 0 |
| 2026-10-05 | 8 | 1 |
| 2026-10-06 | 10 | 1 |
| 2026-10-07 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-10-08 | 8 | 0 |
| 2026-10-09 | 12 | 0 |
| 2026-10-10 | 11 | 0 |
| 2026-10-11 | 11 | 1 |
| 2026-10-12 | 10 | 1 |
| 2026-10-13 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-10-14 | 8 | 0 |
| 2026-10-15 | 5 | 1 |
| 2026-10-16 | 4 | 1 |
| 2026-10-17 | 11 | 0 |
| 2026-10-18 | 7 | 1 |
Recent sentiment
| Period | Positive | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Last 30 days | 95.4% | 282 |
| Last 180 days | 97.0% | 1,741 |
| All time | 94.8% | 23,979 |
| Japanese, last 180 days | 100.0% | 28 |
About this verdict
Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.
Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.
If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About