Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered rate it? TrueGG Rating 96.5%

Release date: Aug 12, 2022 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours.

Good for

  • Players who want fun from the first hours

Think twice if you are

  • Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
  • Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
96.5%
± 0.5 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 10+ hours (last 180 days) · 11,989 reviews

TrueGG, all time
96.3%
Steam overall
96.0%
Japanese, all time
84.9%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 3.7% of all reviews. Their positive share is 84.4%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (10h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 10 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h68%1221–2 h75%1262–5 h97%1,4945–10 h97%1,91610–20 h95%3,50820–50 h97%6,06750–100 h98%2,075100–200 h97%272200+ h99%67Positive share by playtime0–1 h12268%1–2 h12675%2–5 h1,49497%5–10 h1,91697%10–20 h3,50895%20–50 h6,06797%50–100 h2,07598%100–200 h27297%200+ h6799%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h68.0%—122
1–2 h75.4%—126
2–5 h96.6%—1,494
5–10 h96.5%100.0%1,916
10–20 h95.3%75.0%3,508
20–50 h96.6%90.9%6,067
50–100 h98.3%100.0%2,075
100–200 h97.4%—272
200+ h98.5%—67

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 49% had 20+ hours and 2% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered has a TrueGG Rating of 96.5%: the positive share among 11,989 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 10+ hours, close to Steam's overall 96.0%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 96.3%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 4% of the total, with 84% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

Beyond the first hours, approval is fairly even across playtime.

Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs, boredom, and grind (less than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels and pacing.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 84.9%, 11.6 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (95.6% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs, Performance). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Crashes & bugs25% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Boring / repetitive17% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Grind8% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · less than at launch
  • Performance7% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · less than at launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel30% of positive reviews (16% of negative)
  • Movement & pacing10% of positive reviews (7% of negative)
+ スイング+ peak+ 簡単+ 個人的+ ボリューム+ 街中+ 隣人+ 最高− crashes− buy− terrible− tried− years− writing− trash− cutscenes

Counted from 347 recent negative and 561 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating96.0%All time, all languages · 146,031 reviews
Adjusted rating95.6%Weighted by trust (95% range 95.5%–95.8%), −0.4pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews84.7%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−11.3pt vs overall) · 308 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review2%11%
Very short text39%16%
Key activated outside Steam29%26%
Received for free1%1%
Owns very few games18%5%
Over 100 reviews written2%3%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.750.83

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 25.6 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 10k 20k 30k 2022-08: +21,523 / −781 2022-09: +4,880 / −200 2022-10: +2,396 / −107 2022-11: +5,506 / −122 2022-12: +2,730 / −116 2023-01: +2,232 / −117 2023-02: +1,991 / −94 2023-03: +1,321 / −91 2023-04: +981 / −62 2023-05: +818 / −43 2023-06: +3,256 / −115 2023-07: +3,816 / −160 2023-08: +1,247 / −82 2023-09: +1,414 / −95 2023-10: +1,947 / −99 2023-11: +3,533 / −218 2023-12: +1,872 / −121 2024-01: +1,505 / −107 2024-02: +1,044 / −96 2024-03: +1,134 / −96 2024-04: +734 / −61 2024-05: +668 / −156 2024-06: +718 / −49 2024-07: +1,385 / −42 2024-08: +745 / −30 2024-09: +1,076 / −56 2024-10: +773 / −35 2024-11: +1,075 / −51 2024-12: +2,154 / −86 2025-01: +1,794 / −81 2025-02: +885 / −50 2025-03: +1,198 / −55 2025-04: +629 / −27 2025-05: +509 / −33 2025-06: +595 / −32 2025-07: +1,353 / −58 2025-08: +750 / −34 2025-09: +521 / −28 2025-10: +1,176 / −55 2025-11: +1,577 / −76 2025-12: +2,462 / −101 2026-01: +1,803 / −73 2026-02: +1,521 / −62 2026-03: +1,638 / −71 2026-04: +1,118 / −47 2026-05: +689 / −24 2026-06: +817 / −46 2026-07: +2,071 / −86 2026-08: +4,411 / −165 2026-09: +1,394 / −61 2026-10: +1,386 / −61 2022/082023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 95.6% 2022-08: 96.5%2022-09: 96.1%2022-10: 95.7%2022-11: 97.8%2022-12: 95.9%2023-01: 95.0%2023-02: 95.5%2023-03: 93.6%2023-04: 94.1%2023-05: 95.0%2023-06: 96.6%2023-07: 96.0%2023-08: 93.8%2023-09: 93.7%2023-10: 95.2%2023-11: 94.2%2023-12: 93.9%2024-01: 93.4%2024-02: 91.6%2024-03: 92.2%2024-04: 92.3%2024-05: 81.1%2024-06: 93.6%2024-07: 97.1%2024-08: 96.1%2024-09: 95.1%2024-10: 95.7%2024-11: 95.5%2024-12: 96.2%2025-01: 95.7%2025-02: 94.7%2025-03: 95.6%2025-04: 95.9%2025-05: 93.9%2025-06: 94.9%2025-07: 95.9%2025-08: 95.7%2025-09: 94.9%2025-10: 95.5%2025-11: 95.4%2025-12: 96.1%2026-01: 96.1%2026-02: 96.1%2026-03: 95.8%2026-04: 96.0%2026-05: 96.6%2026-06: 94.7%2026-07: 96.0%2026-08: 96.4%2026-09: 95.8%2026-10: 95.8% 2022/082023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 50 100 150 2026-09-20: +59 / −3 2026-09-21: +38 / −3 2026-09-22: +32 / −0 2026-09-23: +35 / −2 2026-09-24: +40 / −1 2026-09-25: +41 / −1 2026-09-26: +41 / −0 2026-09-27: +41 / −1 2026-09-28: +22 / −3 2026-09-29: +27 / −1 2026-09-30: +27 / −3 2026-10-01: +35 / −0 2026-10-02: +53 / −3 2026-10-03: +77 / −5 2026-10-04: +119 / −4 2026-10-05: +97 / −1 2026-10-06: +96 / −7 2026-10-07: +109 / −9 2026-10-08: +113 / −3 2026-10-09: +77 / −6 2026-10-10: +103 / −1 2026-10-11: +91 / −2 2026-10-12: +82 / −4 2026-10-13: +68 / −5 2026-10-14: +59 / −2 2026-10-15: +42 / −0 2026-10-16: +42 / −2 2026-10-17: +60 / −3 2026-10-18: +62 / −3 2026-10-19: +1 / −1 09/2009/2710/0410/1110/18
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2022-0821,52378196.5%
2022-094,88020096.1%
2022-102,39610795.7%
2022-115,50612297.8%
2022-122,73011695.9%
2023-012,23211795.0%
2023-021,9919495.5%
2023-031,3219193.6%
2023-049816294.1%
2023-058184395.0%
2023-063,25611596.6%
2023-073,81616096.0%
2023-081,2478293.8%
2023-091,4149593.7%
2023-101,9479995.2%
2023-113,53321894.2%
2023-121,87212193.9%
2024-011,50510793.4%
2024-021,0449691.6%
2024-031,1349692.2%
2024-047346192.3%
2024-0566815681.1%
2024-067184993.6%
2024-071,3854297.1%
2024-087453096.1%
2024-091,0765695.1%
2024-107733595.7%
2024-111,0755195.5%
2024-122,1548696.2%
2025-011,7948195.7%
2025-028855094.7%
2025-031,1985595.6%
2025-046292795.9%
2025-055093393.9%
2025-065953294.9%
2025-071,3535895.9%
2025-087503495.7%
2025-095212894.9%
2025-101,1765595.5%
2025-111,5777695.4%
2025-122,46210196.1%
2026-011,8037396.1%
2026-021,5216296.1%
2026-031,6387195.8%
2026-041,1184796.0%
2026-056892496.6%
2026-068174694.7%
2026-072,0718696.0%
2026-084,41116596.4%
2026-091,3946195.8%
2026-101,3866195.8%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-20593
2026-09-21383
2026-09-22320
2026-09-23352
2026-09-24401
2026-09-25411
2026-09-26410
2026-09-27411
2026-09-28223
2026-09-29271
2026-09-30273
2026-10-01350
2026-10-02533
2026-10-03775
2026-10-041194
2026-10-05971
2026-10-06967
2026-10-071099
2026-10-081133
2026-10-09776
2026-10-101031
2026-10-11912
2026-10-12824
2026-10-13685
2026-10-14592
2026-10-15420
2026-10-16422
2026-10-17603
2026-10-18623
2026-10-1911
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days95.8%2,551
Last 180 days96.2%15,604
All time96.0%146,031
Japanese, last 180 days89.5%19
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About