How do players who really played Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth rate it? TrueGG Rating 90.3%
Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours.
Good for
- Players who want fun from the first hours
- Players who want dozens of hours of play
Think twice if you are
- Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
- Players wary of microtransactions and DLC
- Players who dislike repetitive grinding
A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How
vs Steam overall
Positive among players with 50+ hours (last 180 days) · 855 reviews
- TrueGG, all time
- 92.0%
- Steam overall
- 90.5%
- Japanese, all time
- 85.8%
Early wall
Reviews written under 2 hours: 3.1% of all reviews. Their positive share is 81.1%.
This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).
Does the rating change the longer people play?
Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.
Show chart values as a table
| Playtime | Positive | Japanese | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 h | 33.3% | — | 15 |
| 1–2 h | 60.0% | 0.0% | 5 |
| 2–5 h | 83.3% | — | 54 |
| 5–10 h | 81.9% | 100.0% | 83 |
| 10–20 h | 75.7% | 100.0% | 115 |
| 20–50 h | 82.9% | 100.0% | 275 |
| 50–100 h | 89.2% | 100.0% | 472 |
| 100–200 h | 91.4% | 77.8% | 339 |
| 200+ h | 93.2% | 100.0% | 44 |
How long people play: half of reviewers had played 50+ hours. 77% had 20+ hours and 26% had 100+ hours (all time).
Summary
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth has a TrueGG Rating of 90.3%: the positive share among 855 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 50+ hours, close to Steam's overall 90.5%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 92.0%).
Reviews written under 2 hours make up 3% of the total, with 81% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.
In the last 180 days, reviews at 20–50h are 83% positive versus 91% at 100–200h: the more people play, the more they like it.
Negative reviews most often mention boredom (more than at launch), monetization and DLC (less than at launch), and pacing (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels and 前作・シリーズ.
Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 85.8%, similar to all languages.
Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (89.8% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.
All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.
Why it is rated this way
Complaints center on the game's design (Boring / repetitive, Movement & pacing, Grind). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you.
− Most mentioned complaints
- Boring / repetitive20% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · more than at launch · 8 positive reviews say it improved
- Monetization & DLC12% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · less than at launch · 8 positive reviews say it improved
- Movement & pacing12% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch · 12 positive reviews say it improved
- Grind12% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch · 12 positive reviews say it improved
- Crashes & bugs10% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
+ What players praise
- Fun & feel36% of positive reviews (25% of negative)
- Compared with earlier entries25% of positive reviews (17% of negative)
Counted from 379 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count
Checking the numbers
Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.
| Metric | Positive | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Official Steam rating | 90.5% | All time, all languages · 24,270 reviews |
| Adjusted rating | 89.8% | Weighted by trust (95% range 89.5%–90.1%), −0.6pt vs official |
| Japanese-language reviews | 84.3% | All time, Japanese-language reviews (−6.2pt vs overall) · 504 reviews |
Show the positive vs negative breakdown
Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.
| Condition | Positive reviews | Negative reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 hours played at review | 1% | 5% |
| Very short text | 25% | 9% |
| Key activated outside Steam | 44% | 34% |
| Received for free | 0% | 1% |
| Owns very few games | 3% | 3% |
| Over 100 reviews written | 12% | 11% |
| Average trust (1.0 = full) | 0.79 | 0.85 |
The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 70.2 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19
When did the rating change?
Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.
Reviews per month
Positive share per month
Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.
Reviews per day, last 30 days
Show monthly data as a table
| Month | Positive | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01 | 2,241 | 237 | 90.4% |
| 2024-02 | 3,214 | 292 | 91.7% |
| 2024-03 | 969 | 95 | 91.1% |
| 2024-04 | 453 | 55 | 89.2% |
| 2024-05 | 400 | 47 | 89.5% |
| 2024-06 | 235 | 34 | 87.4% |
| 2024-07 | 341 | 39 | 89.7% |
| 2024-08 | 219 | 21 | 91.3% |
| 2024-09 | 329 | 40 | 89.2% |
| 2024-10 | 381 | 51 | 88.2% |
| 2024-11 | 1,540 | 69 | 95.7% |
| 2024-12 | 758 | 56 | 93.1% |
| 2025-01 | 419 | 47 | 89.9% |
| 2025-02 | 333 | 48 | 87.4% |
| 2025-03 | 285 | 34 | 89.3% |
| 2025-04 | 172 | 30 | 85.1% |
| 2025-05 | 185 | 24 | 88.5% |
| 2025-06 | 136 | 21 | 86.6% |
| 2025-07 | 244 | 41 | 85.6% |
| 2025-08 | 176 | 25 | 87.6% |
| 2025-09 | 164 | 21 | 88.6% |
| 2025-10 | 245 | 48 | 83.6% |
| 2025-11 | 229 | 27 | 89.5% |
| 2025-12 | 246 | 43 | 85.1% |
| 2026-01 | 224 | 41 | 84.5% |
| 2026-02 | 156 | 23 | 87.2% |
| 2026-03 | 162 | 28 | 85.3% |
| 2026-04 | 138 | 19 | 87.9% |
| 2026-05 | 136 | 22 | 86.1% |
| 2026-06 | 165 | 31 | 84.2% |
| 2026-07 | 179 | 26 | 87.3% |
| 2026-08 | 143 | 22 | 86.7% |
| 2026-09 | 107 | 17 | 86.3% |
| 2026-10 | 76 | 12 | 86.4% |
Show daily data as a table
| Day | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-09-20 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-09-21 | 4 | 1 |
| 2026-09-22 | 5 | 0 |
| 2026-09-23 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-24 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-09-25 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-09-26 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-27 | 9 | 0 |
| 2026-09-28 | 5 | 2 |
| 2026-09-29 | 5 | 0 |
| 2026-09-30 | 4 | 0 |
| 2026-10-01 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-02 | 4 | 0 |
| 2026-10-03 | 1 | 2 |
| 2026-10-04 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-10-05 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-10-06 | 7 | 0 |
| 2026-10-07 | 10 | 1 |
| 2026-10-08 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-10-09 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-10-10 | 5 | 1 |
| 2026-10-11 | 4 | 1 |
| 2026-10-12 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-10-13 | 3 | 1 |
| 2026-10-14 | 5 | 0 |
| 2026-10-15 | 4 | 0 |
| 2026-10-16 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-17 | 4 | 2 |
| 2026-10-18 | 5 | 0 |
Recent sentiment
| Period | Positive | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Last 30 days | 87.2% | 249 |
| Last 180 days | 86.2% | 1,401 |
| All time | 90.5% | 24,270 |
| Japanese, last 180 days | 88.0% | 25 |
See also
Rankings that include this game
Games with a similar rating profile
Loop Hero TrueGG 89.7% · Steam 92.7% 
Unrailed! TrueGG 89.7% · Steam 93.1% 
CrossCode TrueGG 90.4% · Steam 92.3% 
PAYDAY 2 TrueGG 91.8% · Steam 89.4% Image: Steam store (© respective owners)
Check another game
About this verdict
Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.
Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.
If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About