How do players who really played Godus rate it? TrueGG Rating 24.1%

Data as of 2026-10-17 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours. Recent reviews are falling.

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗

24.1%

± 0.6 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 10+ hours (all time) · 4,207 reviews

TrueGG, all time: 24.1%
Steam overall: 24.7%
Japanese, all time: —

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 13.4% of all reviews. Their positive share is 16.6%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (10h+)JapaneseRight: reviews

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (all time). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table

Playtime	Positive	Japanese	Reviews
0–1 h	14.5%	50.0%	519
1–2 h	19.1%	0.0%	451
2–5 h	27.6%	—	934
5–10 h	31.1%	20.0%	1,115
10–20 h	27.8%	25.0%	1,424
20–50 h	24.0%	42.9%	1,618
50–100 h	19.0%	0.0%	741
100–200 h	19.7%	0.0%	299
200+ h	23.2%	—	125

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 39% had 20+ hours and 6% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Godus has a TrueGG Rating of 24.1%, based on all-time reviews from players with 10+ hours (4,207 reviews) because recent reviews are few. Steam's overall rating is 24.7%.

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 13% of the total, with 17% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

In the last 180 days, approval peaks at 31% around 5–10h and falls to 20% at 100–200h: in the current version, long-time players are harsher.

Negative reviews most often mention 未完成・手抜き (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels and crashes and bugs.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (24.2% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-17.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Unfinished / low effort). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too.

− Most mentioned complaints

Unfinished / low effort17% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch

+ What players praise

Fun & feel35% of positive reviews (8% of negative)
Crashes & bugs11% of positive reviews (7% of negative)

＋ enough＋ you're＋ quite＋ simple＋ liked＋ keep＋ build＋ bit− abandoned− scam− peter− molyneux− store− dead− waste− completely

Counted from 318 recent negative and 306 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

Metric	Positive	Scope
Official Steam rating	24.7%	All time, all languages · 7,227 reviews
Adjusted rating	24.2%	Weighted by trust (95% range 23.5%–24.8%), −0.5pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews	25.0%	All time, Japanese-language reviews (+0.3pt vs overall) · 24 reviews · Few reviews; indicative only

Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

Condition	Positive reviews	Negative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review	7%	10%
Very short text	21%	21%
Key activated outside Steam	0%	0%
Received for free	3%	1%
Owns very few games	12%	6%
Over 100 reviews written	7%	11%
Average trust (1.0 = full)	0.84	0.86

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 22 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-17

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative

Positive share per month

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

Show monthly data as a table

Month	Positive	Negative	Positive
2013-09	47	40	54.0%
2013-10	17	19	47.2%
2013-11	27	39	40.9%
2013-12	310	288	51.8%
2014-01	256	376	40.5%
2014-02	50	202	19.8%
2014-03	79	246	24.3%
2014-04	40	92	30.3%
2014-05	31	92	25.2%
2014-06	66	104	38.8%
2014-07	20	75	21.1%
2014-08	65	178	26.7%
2014-09	62	165	27.3%
2014-10	32	139	18.7%
2014-11	22	126	14.9%
2014-12	96	164	36.9%
2015-01	37	108	25.5%
2015-02	30	232	11.5%
2015-03	24	101	19.2%
2015-04	37	84	30.6%
2015-05	10	61	14.1%
2015-06	31	80	27.9%
2015-07	13	54	19.4%
2015-08	30	88	25.4%
2015-09	26	50	34.2%
2015-10	15	55	21.4%
2015-11	7	63	10.0%
2015-12	14	60	18.9%
2016-01	17	113	13.1%
2016-02	17	130	11.6%
2016-03	18	56	24.3%
2016-04	11	49	18.3%
2016-05	9	53	14.5%
2016-06	9	71	11.3%
2016-07	7	55	11.3%
2016-08	5	60	7.7%
2016-09	7	35	16.7%
2016-10	3	36	7.7%
2016-11	9	77	10.5%
2016-12	2	47	4.1%
2017-01	3	38	7.3%
2017-02	1	32	3.0%
2017-03	5	32	13.5%
2017-04	5	38	11.6%
2017-05	2	34	5.6%
2017-06	5	40	11.1%
2017-07	4	39	9.3%
2017-08	1	26	3.7%
2017-09	3	20	13.0%
2017-10	6	32	15.8%
2017-11	7	36	16.3%
2017-12	5	32	13.5%
2018-01	3	34	8.1%
2018-02	1	25	3.8%
2018-03	3	28	9.7%
2018-04	3	28	9.7%
2018-05	5	26	16.1%
2018-06	4	15	21.1%
2018-07	3	14	17.6%
2018-08	4	26	13.3%
2018-09	3	15	16.7%
2018-10	0	15	0.0%
2018-11	1	11	8.3%
2018-12	1	19	5.0%
2019-01	0	19	0.0%
2019-02	2	15	11.8%
2019-03	0	16	0.0%
2019-04	1	16	5.9%
2019-05	1	15	6.3%
2019-06	5	17	22.7%
2019-07	5	29	14.7%
2019-08	4	8	33.3%
2019-09	1	16	5.9%
2019-10	3	18	14.3%
2019-11	4	9	30.8%
2019-12	6	24	20.0%
2020-01	5	11	31.3%
2020-02	3	7	30.0%
2020-03	12	15	44.4%
2020-04	3	16	15.8%
2020-05	5	21	19.2%
2020-06	1	13	7.1%
2020-07	8	7	53.3%
2020-08	1	15	6.3%
2020-09	5	5	50.0%
2020-10	4	15	21.1%
2020-11	8	28	22.2%
2020-12	3	12	20.0%
2021-01	1	7	12.5%
2021-02	2	19	9.5%
2021-03	6	10	37.5%
2021-04	4	9	30.8%
2021-05	4	15	21.1%
2021-06	3	7	30.0%
2021-07	3	15	16.7%
2021-08	2	13	13.3%
2021-09	2	11	15.4%
2021-10	2	10	16.7%
2021-11	1	9	10.0%
2021-12	5	21	19.2%
2022-01	5	12	29.4%
2022-02	1	10	9.1%
2022-03	1	8	11.1%
2022-04	4	16	20.0%
2022-05	3	5	37.5%
2022-06	2	8	20.0%
2022-07	3	6	33.3%
2022-08	1	4	20.0%
2022-09	3	10	23.1%
2022-10	1	8	11.1%
2022-11	3	5	37.5%
2022-12	1	10	9.1%
2023-01	1	6	14.3%
2023-02	3	3	50.0%
2023-03	5	4	55.6%
2023-04	3	12	20.0%
2023-05	5	8	38.5%
2023-06	1	5	16.7%
2023-07	2	7	22.2%
2023-08	4	3	57.1%
2023-09	1	8	11.1%
2023-10	3	7	30.0%
2023-11	4	7	36.4%
2023-12	2	24	7.7%
2024-01	0	13	0.0%
2024-02	0	2	0.0%
2024-03	0	3	0.0%
2024-04	3	1	75.0%
2024-05	0	4	0.0%
2024-06	3	3	50.0%
2024-07	0	3	0.0%
2024-08	2	5	28.6%
2024-09	0	3	0.0%
2024-10	1	1	50.0%
2024-11	0	2	0.0%
2024-12	1	6	14.3%
2025-01	1	3	25.0%
2025-02	1	2	33.3%
2025-03	0	4	0.0%
2025-04	0	1	0.0%
2025-05	0	4	0.0%
2025-06	0	3	0.0%
2025-07	0	3	0.0%
2025-08	0	5	0.0%
2025-09	0	3	0.0%
2025-10	0	2	0.0%
2025-11	0	1	0.0%
2025-12	0	1	0.0%
2026-01	2	5	28.6%
2026-02	0	3	0.0%
2026-03	0	3	0.0%
2026-04	0	1	0.0%
2026-05	0	1	0.0%
2026-07	0	3	0.0%
2026-08	1	2	33.3%
2026-09	1	2	33.3%

Show daily data as a table

Day	Positive	Negative
2026-08-24	0	0
2026-08-25	0	0
2026-08-26	0	0
2026-08-27	0	0
2026-08-28	0	0
2026-08-29	0	0
2026-08-30	1	0
2026-08-31	0	0
2026-09-01	0	1
2026-09-02	0	0
2026-09-03	0	0
2026-09-04	0	0
2026-09-05	0	0
2026-09-06	0	0
2026-09-07	0	0
2026-09-08	0	0
2026-09-09	0	0
2026-09-10	0	0
2026-09-11	0	0
2026-09-12	1	0
2026-09-13	0	0
2026-09-14	0	0
2026-09-15	0	0
2026-09-16	0	0
2026-09-17	0	0
2026-09-18	0	0
2026-09-19	0	0
2026-09-20	0	0
2026-09-21	0	0
2026-09-22	0	1