How do players who really played Feed the Cups rate it? TrueGG Rating 65.3%
Players who really played rate it lower than Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours. Recent reviews are falling.
vs Steam overall
Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 346 reviews
- TrueGG, all time
- 66.9%
- Steam overall
- 70.7%
- Japanese, all time
- —
Early wall
Reviews written under 2 hours: 4.4% of all reviews. Their positive share is 62.2%.
This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).
Does the rating change the longer people play?
Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.
Show chart values as a table
| Playtime | Positive | Japanese | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 h | 11.1% | — | 9 |
| 1–2 h | 33.3% | — | 6 |
| 2–5 h | 56.4% | 100.0% | 39 |
| 5–10 h | 44.0% | — | 50 |
| 10–20 h | 63.2% | — | 68 |
| 20–50 h | 64.2% | — | 109 |
| 50–100 h | 59.5% | — | 84 |
| 100–200 h | 70.0% | — | 80 |
| 200+ h | 68.5% | — | 73 |
How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 55% had 20+ hours and 18% had 100+ hours (all time).
Summary
Feed the Cups has a TrueGG Rating of 65.3%: the positive share among 346 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours. That is 5.3 points below Steam's overall 70.7%, so players who really play the current version are harsher than the headline number suggests (all time: 66.9%).
Reviews written under 2 hours make up 4% of the total, with 62% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.
Negative reviews most often mention updates and the developers, crashes and bugs, and grind. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels, community and co-op, and the story.
Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (69.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.
All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-17.
Why it is rated this way
Complaints center on live operations and online play (Updates & developers, Servers & connection). These shift over time, so weigh recent reviews more than the all-time figure.
− Most mentioned complaints
- Updates & developers37% of negative reviews (11% of positive) · 5 positive reviews say it improved
- Crashes & bugs10% of negative reviews (4% of positive)
- Grind8% of negative reviews (4% of positive)
- Boring / repetitive8% of negative reviews (2% of positive)
- Servers & connection8% of negative reviews (1% of positive)
+ What players praise
- Fun & feel45% of positive reviews (14% of negative)
- Community & co-op24% of positive reviews (12% of negative)
- Story10% of positive reviews (4% of negative)
Counted from 49 recent negative and 260 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count
Checking the numbers
Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.
| Metric | Positive | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Official Steam rating | 70.7% | All time, all languages · 6,607 reviews |
| Adjusted rating | 69.0% | Weighted by trust (95% range 68.1%–69.8%), −1.7pt vs official |
| Japanese-language reviews | 100.0% | All time, Japanese-language reviews (+29.3pt vs overall) · 19 reviews · Few reviews; indicative only |
Show the positive vs negative breakdown
Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.
| Condition | Positive reviews | Negative reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 hours played at review | 1% | 6% |
| Very short text | 40% | 19% |
| Key activated outside Steam | 36% | 47% |
| Received for free | 0% | 0% |
| Owns very few games | 26% | 20% |
| Over 100 reviews written | 1% | 1% |
| Average trust (1.0 = full) | 0.72 | 0.78 |
The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 94.5 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-17
When did the rating change?
Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.
Reviews per month
Positive share per month
Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.Shaded months were detected as concentrated waves of negative reviews (2024-05, 2024-06).Detection rule
Reviews per day, last 30 days
Show monthly data as a table
| Month | Positive | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02 | 870 | 42 | 95.4% |
| 2024-03 | 1,077 | 107 | 91.0% |
| 2024-04 | 510 | 78 | 86.7% |
| 2024-05 | 329 | 5,829 | 5.3% |
| 2024-06 | 92 | 422 | 17.9% |
| 2024-07 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% |
| 2024-08 | 47 | 56 | 45.6% |
| 2024-09 | 49 | 48 | 50.5% |
| 2024-10 | 49 | 32 | 60.5% |
| 2024-11 | 138 | 51 | 73.0% |
| 2024-12 | 111 | 38 | 74.5% |
| 2025-01 | 62 | 45 | 57.9% |
| 2025-02 | 54 | 32 | 62.8% |
| 2025-03 | 70 | 41 | 63.1% |
| 2025-04 | 49 | 31 | 61.3% |
| 2025-05 | 59 | 32 | 64.8% |
| 2025-06 | 43 | 43 | 50.0% |
| 2025-07 | 40 | 31 | 56.3% |
| 2025-08 | 43 | 32 | 57.3% |
| 2025-09 | 43 | 34 | 55.8% |
| 2025-10 | 64 | 31 | 67.4% |
| 2025-11 | 89 | 39 | 69.5% |
| 2025-12 | 62 | 43 | 59.0% |
| 2026-01 | 46 | 42 | 52.3% |
| 2026-02 | 38 | 17 | 69.1% |
| 2026-03 | 38 | 24 | 61.3% |
| 2026-04 | 21 | 26 | 44.7% |
| 2026-05 | 31 | 24 | 56.4% |
| 2026-06 | 40 | 26 | 60.6% |
| 2026-07 | 41 | 19 | 68.3% |
| 2026-08 | 35 | 10 | 77.8% |
| 2026-09 | 25 | 10 | 71.4% |
| 2026-10 | 30 | 12 | 71.4% |
Show daily data as a table
| Day | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-19 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-20 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-21 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-22 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-23 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-24 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-25 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-26 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026-09-27 | 4 | 0 |
| 2026-09-28 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-29 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-30 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-01 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-02 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-10-03 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-04 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-05 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-06 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-10-07 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-10-08 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-10-09 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-10 | 1 | 2 |
| 2026-10-11 | 2 | 3 |
| 2026-10-12 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-13 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-14 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-10-15 | 4 | 1 |
| 2026-10-16 | 6 | 1 |
| 2026-10-17 | 0 | 1 |
Recent sentiment
| Period | Positive | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Last 30 days | 76.2% | 84 |
| Last 180 days | 61.3% | 514 |
| All time | 70.7% | 6,607 |
| Japanese, last 180 days | 100.0% | 1 |
About this verdict
Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.
Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.
If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About