How do players who really played Forza Motorsport rate it? TrueGG Rating 68.4%
Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks. Recent reviews are recovering.
vs Steam overall
Positive among players with 10+ hours (last 180 days) · 452 reviews
- TrueGG, all time
- 53.8%
- Steam overall
- 51.5%
- Japanese, all time
- 47.6%
Early wall
Reviews written under 2 hours: 10.3% of all reviews. Their positive share is 22.0%.
This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).
Does the rating change the longer people play?
Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.
Show chart values as a table
| Playtime | Positive | Japanese | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 h | 20.9% | — | 43 |
| 1–2 h | 47.1% | 100.0% | 34 |
| 2–5 h | 80.7% | 100.0% | 109 |
| 5–10 h | 77.0% | 100.0% | 100 |
| 10–20 h | 71.2% | 100.0% | 111 |
| 20–50 h | 69.7% | 100.0% | 152 |
| 50–100 h | 59.0% | 0.0% | 83 |
| 100–200 h | 72.9% | 100.0% | 59 |
| 200+ h | 68.1% | — | 47 |
How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 47% had 20+ hours and 14% had 100+ hours (all time).
Summary
Forza Motorsport has a TrueGG Rating of 68.4%: the positive share among 452 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 10+ hours. That is 16.8 points above Steam's overall 51.5%, so players who really play the current version rate it higher than the headline number suggests (all time: 53.8%).
Reviews written under 2 hours make up 10% of the total, and only 22% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.
Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs (less than at launch), updates and the developers (less than at launch), and pacing (less than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.
Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (50.8% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.
All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-17.
Why it is rated this way
Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs). They have declined since launch, so things may have improved. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).
− Most mentioned complaints
- Crashes & bugs24% of negative reviews (9% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · less than at launch · 9 positive reviews say it improved
- Updates & developers17% of negative reviews (11% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · less than at launch · 12 positive reviews say it improved
- Movement & pacing11% of negative reviews (7% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · less than at launch · 8 positive reviews say it improved
- Boring / repetitive9% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
- Price8% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch
+ What players praise
- Fun & feel31% of positive reviews (21% of negative)
Counted from 400 recent negative and 379 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count
Checking the numbers
Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.
| Metric | Positive | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Official Steam rating | 51.5% | All time, all languages · 12,928 reviews |
| Adjusted rating | 50.8% | Weighted by trust (95% range 49.9%–51.7%), −0.7pt vs official |
| Japanese-language reviews | 44.1% | All time, Japanese-language reviews (−7.4pt vs overall) · 179 reviews |
Show the positive vs negative breakdown
Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.
| Condition | Positive reviews | Negative reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 hours played at review | 5% | 18% |
| Very short text | 31% | 12% |
| Key activated outside Steam | 5% | 6% |
| Received for free | 1% | 2% |
| Owns very few games | 9% | 7% |
| Over 100 reviews written | 7% | 5% |
| Average trust (1.0 = full) | 0.83 | 0.85 |
The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 32.5 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-17
When did the rating change?
Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.
Reviews per month
Positive share per month
Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.
Reviews per day, last 30 days
Show monthly data as a table
| Month | Positive | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10 | 1,333 | 2,075 | 39.1% |
| 2023-11 | 453 | 570 | 44.3% |
| 2023-12 | 215 | 338 | 38.9% |
| 2024-01 | 135 | 286 | 32.1% |
| 2024-02 | 124 | 172 | 41.9% |
| 2024-03 | 178 | 150 | 54.3% |
| 2024-04 | 190 | 255 | 42.7% |
| 2024-05 | 133 | 154 | 46.3% |
| 2024-06 | 220 | 194 | 53.1% |
| 2024-07 | 162 | 178 | 47.6% |
| 2024-08 | 62 | 98 | 38.8% |
| 2024-09 | 139 | 122 | 53.3% |
| 2024-10 | 89 | 84 | 51.4% |
| 2024-11 | 112 | 70 | 61.5% |
| 2024-12 | 229 | 158 | 59.2% |
| 2025-01 | 170 | 120 | 58.6% |
| 2025-02 | 116 | 58 | 66.7% |
| 2025-03 | 124 | 87 | 58.8% |
| 2025-04 | 109 | 81 | 57.4% |
| 2025-05 | 198 | 121 | 62.1% |
| 2025-06 | 264 | 198 | 57.1% |
| 2025-07 | 188 | 122 | 60.6% |
| 2025-08 | 128 | 76 | 62.7% |
| 2025-09 | 102 | 64 | 61.4% |
| 2025-10 | 110 | 72 | 60.4% |
| 2025-11 | 132 | 92 | 58.9% |
| 2025-12 | 112 | 95 | 54.1% |
| 2026-01 | 122 | 84 | 59.2% |
| 2026-02 | 90 | 77 | 53.9% |
| 2026-03 | 98 | 52 | 65.3% |
| 2026-04 | 105 | 58 | 64.4% |
| 2026-05 | 69 | 45 | 60.5% |
| 2026-06 | 81 | 53 | 60.4% |
| 2026-07 | 76 | 32 | 70.4% |
| 2026-08 | 67 | 30 | 69.1% |
| 2026-09 | 92 | 29 | 76.0% |
| 2026-10 | 48 | 30 | 61.5% |
Show daily data as a table
| Day | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | 1 | 2 |
| 2026-09-19 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-09-20 | 7 | 1 |
| 2026-09-21 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-09-22 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-09-23 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026-09-24 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-09-25 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-09-26 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-09-27 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-28 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-29 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-09-30 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-01 | 1 | 2 |
| 2026-10-02 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026-10-03 | 5 | 0 |
| 2026-10-04 | 4 | 5 |
| 2026-10-05 | 6 | 2 |
| 2026-10-06 | 4 | 5 |
| 2026-10-07 | 7 | 2 |
| 2026-10-08 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-10-09 | 3 | 2 |
| 2026-10-10 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-10-11 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-10-12 | 2 | 4 |
| 2026-10-13 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-10-14 | 2 | 1 |
| 2026-10-15 | 1 | 3 |
| 2026-10-16 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-17 | 1 | 0 |
Recent sentiment
| Period | Positive | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Last 30 days | 63.6% | 118 |
| Last 180 days | 67.6% | 738 |
| All time | 51.5% | 12,928 |
| Japanese, last 180 days | 87.5% | 8 |
See also
Rankings that include this game
Games with a similar rating profile
eFootball TrueGG 66.7% · Steam 52.0% 
Wo Long: Fallen Dynasty TrueGG 67.8% · Steam 50.0% 
Monster Hunter Wilds TrueGG 64.7% · Steam 49.7% 
Starfield TrueGG 65.6% · Steam 56.9% Image: Steam store (© respective owners)
Check another game
About this verdict
Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.
Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.
If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About