SD GUNDAM G GENERATION CROSS RAYS
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played SD GUNDAM G GENERATION CROSS RAYS rate it? TrueGG Rating 85.2%

Release date: Nov 27, 2019 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks. Recent reviews are falling.

Think twice if you are

  • Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
  • Players without a strong PC (reports of poor performance)
  • Players particular about controls and UI

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
85.2%
▲ +3.1 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (all time) · 4,458 reviews

TrueGG, all time
85.2%
Steam overall
82.0%
Japanese, all time
63.1%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 11.8% of all reviews. Their positive share is 57.9%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h54%6251–2 h66%3462–5 h80%7925–10 h88%84610–20 h88%1,16620–50 h86%1,68550–100 h84%1,215100–200 h85%1,044200+ h85%514Positive share by playtime0–1 h62554%1–2 h34666%2–5 h79280%5–10 h84688%10–20 h1,16688%20–50 h1,68586%50–100 h1,21584%100–200 h1,04485%200+ h51485%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (all time). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h53.6%37.8%625
1–2 h65.6%42.9%346
2–5 h79.9%46.4%792
5–10 h87.6%50.0%846
10–20 h87.7%52.3%1,166
20–50 h85.9%51.9%1,685
50–100 h84.0%59.7%1,215
100–200 h85.2%68.9%1,044
200+ h85.4%75.0%514

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 54% had 20+ hours and 19% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

SD GUNDAM G GENERATION CROSS RAYS has a TrueGG Rating of 85.2%, based on all-time reviews from players with 20+ hours (4,458 reviews) because recent reviews are few. Steam's overall rating is 82.0%.

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 12% of the total, and only 58% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

Beyond the first hours, approval is fairly even across playtime.

Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs (less than at launch), performance, and boredom (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels, 前作・シリーズ, and monetization and DLC.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 63.1%, 22.1 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (82.7% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs, Performance). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Crashes & bugs43% of negative reviews (12% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · less than at launch · 8 positive reviews say it improved
  • Performance10% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · ongoing since launch
  • Boring / repetitive10% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch
  • Controls, UI & camera8% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · more than at launch
  • Price7% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel34% of positive reviews (15% of negative)
  • Compared with earlier entries16% of positive reviews (8% of negative)
  • Monetization & DLC10% of positive reviews (5% of negative)
  • Difficulty8% of positive reviews (5% of negative)
+ オルフェンズ+ 一応+ deck+ インフェルノ+ 追体験+ 世界+ 正直+ 可能− minutes− keeps− fix− boring− update− cant− unplayable− screen

Counted from 446 recent negative and 513 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating82.0%All time, all languages · 8,202 reviews
Adjusted rating82.7%Weighted by trust (95% range 82.2%–83.2%), +0.7pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews55.5%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−26.6pt vs overall) · 384 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review2%17%
Very short text25%12%
Key activated outside Steam13%26%
Received for free1%0%
Owns very few games9%13%
Over 100 reviews written6%4%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.840.80

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 78.3 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 500 1,000 1,500 2019-11: +1,027 / −224 2019-12: +1,168 / −146 2020-01: +264 / −29 2020-02: +147 / −25 2020-03: +185 / −30 2020-04: +68 / −14 2020-05: +100 / −13 2020-06: +95 / −15 2020-07: +133 / −24 2020-08: +54 / −3 2020-09: +50 / −16 2020-10: +56 / −5 2020-11: +62 / −9 2020-12: +84 / −15 2021-01: +77 / −13 2021-02: +49 / −7 2021-03: +25 / −2 2021-04: +25 / −10 2021-05: +97 / −16 2021-06: +115 / −29 2021-07: +126 / −15 2021-08: +47 / −8 2021-09: +92 / −14 2021-10: +78 / −14 2021-11: +56 / −14 2021-12: +60 / −13 2022-01: +74 / −13 2022-02: +49 / −4 2022-03: +49 / −10 2022-04: +36 / −3 2022-05: +82 / −19 2022-06: +41 / −14 2022-07: +53 / −11 2022-08: +43 / −18 2022-09: +44 / −14 2022-10: +30 / −7 2022-11: +48 / −10 2022-12: +27 / −16 2023-01: +43 / −12 2023-02: +35 / −3 2023-03: +30 / −4 2023-04: +27 / −6 2023-05: +14 / −3 2023-06: +15 / −7 2023-07: +36 / −8 2023-08: +21 / −5 2023-09: +18 / −10 2023-10: +20 / −2 2023-11: +36 / −5 2023-12: +25 / −5 2024-01: +20 / −4 2024-02: +21 / −10 2024-03: +31 / −13 2024-04: +22 / −4 2024-05: +37 / −19 2024-06: +28 / −14 2024-07: +27 / −11 2024-08: +14 / −11 2024-09: +12 / −6 2024-10: +21 / −50 2024-11: +17 / −7 2024-12: +36 / −30 2025-01: +29 / −14 2025-02: +22 / −11 2025-03: +21 / −10 2025-04: +34 / −11 2025-05: +23 / −15 2025-06: +14 / −15 2025-07: +19 / −12 2025-08: +10 / −12 2025-09: +14 / −16 2025-10: +18 / −8 2025-11: +10 / −7 2025-12: +10 / −4 2026-01: +8 / −7 2026-02: +7 / −4 2026-03: +9 / −5 2026-04: +11 / −7 2026-05: +14 / −9 2026-06: +4 / −6 2026-07: +7 / −11 2026-08: +5 / −2 2026-09: +7 / −9 2026-10: +3 / −4 2019/112020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 81.6% 2019-11: 82.1%2019-12: 88.9%2020-01: 90.1%2020-02: 85.5%2020-03: 86.0%2020-04: 82.9%2020-05: 88.5%2020-06: 86.4%2020-07: 84.7%2020-08: 94.7%2020-09: 75.8%2020-10: 91.8%2020-11: 87.3%2020-12: 84.8%2021-01: 85.6%2021-02: 87.5%2021-04: 71.4%2021-05: 85.8%2021-06: 79.9%2021-07: 89.4%2021-08: 85.5%2021-09: 86.8%2021-10: 84.8%2021-11: 80.0%2021-12: 82.2%2022-01: 85.1%2022-02: 92.5%2022-03: 83.1%2022-04: 92.3%2022-05: 81.2%2022-06: 74.5%2022-07: 82.8%2022-08: 70.5%2022-09: 75.9%2022-10: 81.1%2022-11: 82.8%2022-12: 62.8%2023-01: 78.2%2023-02: 92.1%2023-03: 88.2%2023-04: 81.8%2023-07: 81.8%2023-11: 87.8%2023-12: 83.3%2024-02: 67.7%2024-03: 70.5%2024-05: 66.1%2024-06: 66.7%2024-07: 71.1%2024-10: 29.6%2024-12: 54.5%2025-01: 67.4%2025-02: 66.7%2025-03: 67.7%2025-04: 75.6%2025-05: 60.5%2025-07: 61.3%2025-09: 46.7% 2019/112020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2026-09-18: +0 / −1 2026-09-19: +0 / −0 2026-09-20: +0 / −1 2026-09-21: +0 / −0 2026-09-22: +0 / −0 2026-09-23: +1 / −0 2026-09-24: +1 / −0 2026-09-25: +0 / −0 2026-09-26: +0 / −0 2026-09-27: +0 / −0 2026-09-28: +0 / −0 2026-09-29: +0 / −0 2026-09-30: +0 / −0 2026-10-01: +0 / −1 2026-10-02: +0 / −0 2026-10-03: +0 / −1 2026-10-04: +2 / −0 2026-10-05: +0 / −0 2026-10-06: +0 / −0 2026-10-07: +0 / −1 2026-10-08: +0 / −0 2026-10-09: +0 / −0 2026-10-10: +0 / −0 2026-10-11: +0 / −0 2026-10-12: +0 / −1 2026-10-13: +0 / −0 2026-10-14: +0 / −0 2026-10-15: +0 / −0 2026-10-16: +0 / −0 2026-10-17: +1 / −0 09/1809/2510/0210/0910/16
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2019-111,02722482.1%
2019-121,16814688.9%
2020-012642990.1%
2020-021472585.5%
2020-031853086.0%
2020-04681482.9%
2020-051001388.5%
2020-06951586.4%
2020-071332484.7%
2020-0854394.7%
2020-09501675.8%
2020-1056591.8%
2020-1162987.3%
2020-12841584.8%
2021-01771385.6%
2021-0249787.5%
2021-0325292.6%
2021-04251071.4%
2021-05971685.8%
2021-061152979.9%
2021-071261589.4%
2021-0847885.5%
2021-09921486.8%
2021-10781484.8%
2021-11561480.0%
2021-12601382.2%
2022-01741385.1%
2022-0249492.5%
2022-03491083.1%
2022-0436392.3%
2022-05821981.2%
2022-06411474.5%
2022-07531182.8%
2022-08431870.5%
2022-09441475.9%
2022-1030781.1%
2022-11481082.8%
2022-12271662.8%
2023-01431278.2%
2023-0235392.1%
2023-0330488.2%
2023-0427681.8%
2023-0514382.4%
2023-0615768.2%
2023-0736881.8%
2023-0821580.8%
2023-09181064.3%
2023-1020290.9%
2023-1136587.8%
2023-1225583.3%
2024-0120483.3%
2024-02211067.7%
2024-03311370.5%
2024-0422484.6%
2024-05371966.1%
2024-06281466.7%
2024-07271171.1%
2024-08141156.0%
2024-0912666.7%
2024-10215029.6%
2024-1117770.8%
2024-12363054.5%
2025-01291467.4%
2025-02221166.7%
2025-03211067.7%
2025-04341175.6%
2025-05231560.5%
2025-06141548.3%
2025-07191261.3%
2025-08101245.5%
2025-09141646.7%
2025-1018869.2%
2025-1110758.8%
2025-1210471.4%
2026-018753.3%
2026-027463.6%
2026-039564.3%
2026-0411761.1%
2026-0514960.9%
2026-064640.0%
2026-0771138.9%
2026-085271.4%
2026-097943.8%
2026-103442.9%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1801
2026-09-1900
2026-09-2001
2026-09-2100
2026-09-2200
2026-09-2310
2026-09-2410
2026-09-2500
2026-09-2600
2026-09-2700
2026-09-2800
2026-09-2900
2026-09-3000
2026-10-0101
2026-10-0200
2026-10-0301
2026-10-0420
2026-10-0500
2026-10-0600
2026-10-0701
2026-10-0800
2026-10-0900
2026-10-1000
2026-10-1100
2026-10-1201
2026-10-1300
2026-10-1400
2026-10-1500
2026-10-1600
2026-10-1710
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days41.7%12
Last 180 days41.7%115
All time82.0%8,202
Japanese, last 180 days18.2%11
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About