Outer Wilds
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Outer Wilds rate it? TrueGG Rating 98.6%

Release date: Jun 18, 2020 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.

Good for

  • Players willing to push through a slow start

Think twice if you are

  • Players who judge a game in the first hours (early ratings are lower)
  • Players who put story first
  • Players particular about controls and UI

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
98.6%
▲ +3.0 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 6,050 reviews

TrueGG, all time
99.0%
Steam overall
95.6%
Japanese, all time
92.9%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 4.2% of all reviews. Their positive share is 63.7%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h60%1461–2 h63%1392–5 h79%4765–10 h85%58210–20 h95%1,89920–50 h98%4,95250–100 h99%949100–200 h99%127200+ h95%22Positive share by playtime0–1 h14660%1–2 h13963%2–5 h47679%5–10 h58285%10–20 h1,89995%20–50 h4,95298%50–100 h94999%100–200 h12799%200+ h2295%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h60.3%0.0%146
1–2 h62.6%0.0%139
2–5 h79.2%25.0%476
5–10 h84.5%0.0%582
10–20 h95.0%80.0%1,899
20–50 h98.4%85.7%4,952
50–100 h99.4%100.0%949
100–200 h99.2%100.0%127
200+ h95.5%—22

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 59% had 20+ hours and 1% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Outer Wilds has a TrueGG Rating of 98.6%: the positive share among 6,050 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours, close to Steam's overall 95.6%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 99.0%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 4% of the total, and only 64% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

In the last 180 days, reviews at 2–5h are 79% positive versus 99% at 50–100h: the more people play, the more they like it.

Negative reviews most often mention how fun it feels (more than at launch), the story (more than at launch), and controls and UI (less than at launch).

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 92.9%, 5.6 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (95.6% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Story, Controls, UI & camera, Boring / repetitive, Movement & pacing). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Fun & feel31% of negative reviews (19% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch
  • Story30% of negative reviews (15% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch
  • Controls, UI & camera21% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · less than at launch
  • Boring / repetitive18% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
  • Movement & pacing13% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

No standout topics

+ 絶対+ 人生+ 最高+ 存在+ 本編+ 好奇心+ peak+ 真実− boring− text− overrated− annoying− worst− waste− refund− personally

Counted from 433 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating95.6%All time, all languages · 109,439 reviews
Adjusted rating95.6%Weighted by trust (95% range 95.4%–95.7%), ±0.0pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews83.9%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−11.7pt vs overall) · 824 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review3%23%
Very short text30%12%
Key activated outside Steam21%17%
Received for free1%1%
Owns very few games10%5%
Over 100 reviews written2%6%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.810.81

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 18 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 2020-06: +2,398 / −190 2020-07: +2,743 / −136 2020-08: +1,020 / −54 2020-09: +631 / −23 2020-10: +1,586 / −90 2020-11: +2,946 / −56 2020-12: +1,225 / −68 2021-01: +1,165 / −54 2021-02: +837 / −43 2021-03: +717 / −42 2021-04: +588 / −42 2021-05: +1,001 / −73 2021-06: +1,034 / −73 2021-07: +1,160 / −89 2021-08: +1,043 / −57 2021-09: +1,173 / −47 2021-10: +2,637 / −104 2021-11: +1,636 / −61 2021-12: +1,393 / −89 2022-01: +1,580 / −81 2022-02: +882 / −43 2022-03: +625 / −38 2022-04: +812 / −37 2022-05: +918 / −62 2022-06: +893 / −51 2022-07: +1,058 / −51 2022-08: +897 / −36 2022-09: +758 / −36 2022-10: +662 / −39 2022-11: +1,043 / −64 2022-12: +1,021 / −54 2023-01: +1,143 / −56 2023-02: +833 / −35 2023-03: +894 / −47 2023-04: +840 / −29 2023-05: +953 / −60 2023-06: +686 / −35 2023-07: +1,075 / −59 2023-08: +932 / −39 2023-09: +959 / −43 2023-10: +836 / −35 2023-11: +1,086 / −52 2023-12: +1,205 / −69 2024-01: +1,386 / −69 2024-02: +1,083 / −60 2024-03: +1,051 / −64 2024-04: +971 / −44 2024-05: +970 / −48 2024-06: +1,085 / −54 2024-07: +1,351 / −89 2024-08: +994 / −41 2024-09: +985 / −41 2024-10: +779 / −43 2024-11: +1,026 / −57 2024-12: +1,637 / −96 2025-01: +1,685 / −92 2025-02: +1,139 / −56 2025-03: +1,433 / −77 2025-04: +1,099 / −73 2025-05: +952 / −46 2025-06: +1,141 / −62 2025-07: +1,565 / −93 2025-08: +1,210 / −65 2025-09: +1,017 / −62 2025-10: +1,169 / −68 2025-11: +1,013 / −46 2025-12: +1,165 / −66 2026-01: +1,397 / −73 2026-02: +916 / −60 2026-03: +1,254 / −72 2026-04: +1,202 / −60 2026-05: +1,183 / −88 2026-06: +1,322 / −66 2026-07: +1,436 / −97 2026-08: +1,076 / −61 2026-09: +1,004 / −58 2026-10: +688 / −46 2020/062021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 94.9% 2020-06: 92.7%2020-07: 95.3%2020-08: 95.0%2020-09: 96.5%2020-10: 94.6%2020-11: 98.1%2020-12: 94.7%2021-01: 95.6%2021-02: 95.1%2021-03: 94.5%2021-04: 93.3%2021-05: 93.2%2021-06: 93.4%2021-07: 92.9%2021-08: 94.8%2021-09: 96.1%2021-10: 96.2%2021-11: 96.4%2021-12: 94.0%2022-01: 95.1%2022-02: 95.4%2022-03: 94.3%2022-04: 95.6%2022-05: 93.7%2022-06: 94.6%2022-07: 95.4%2022-08: 96.1%2022-09: 95.5%2022-10: 94.4%2022-11: 94.2%2022-12: 95.0%2023-01: 95.3%2023-02: 96.0%2023-03: 95.0%2023-04: 96.7%2023-05: 94.1%2023-06: 95.1%2023-07: 94.8%2023-08: 96.0%2023-09: 95.7%2023-10: 96.0%2023-11: 95.4%2023-12: 94.6%2024-01: 95.3%2024-02: 94.8%2024-03: 94.3%2024-04: 95.7%2024-05: 95.3%2024-06: 95.3%2024-07: 93.8%2024-08: 96.0%2024-09: 96.0%2024-10: 94.8%2024-11: 94.7%2024-12: 94.5%2025-01: 94.8%2025-02: 95.3%2025-03: 94.9%2025-04: 93.8%2025-05: 95.4%2025-06: 94.8%2025-07: 94.4%2025-08: 94.9%2025-09: 94.3%2025-10: 94.5%2025-11: 95.7%2025-12: 94.6%2026-01: 95.0%2026-02: 93.9%2026-03: 94.6%2026-04: 95.2%2026-05: 93.1%2026-06: 95.2%2026-07: 93.7%2026-08: 94.6%2026-09: 94.5%2026-10: 93.7% 2020/062021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 20 40 60 2026-09-19: +36 / −7 2026-09-20: +30 / −0 2026-09-21: +28 / −2 2026-09-22: +24 / −1 2026-09-23: +26 / −2 2026-09-24: +27 / −0 2026-09-25: +38 / −1 2026-09-26: +41 / −1 2026-09-27: +42 / −2 2026-09-28: +23 / −2 2026-09-29: +29 / −3 2026-09-30: +17 / −0 2026-10-01: +25 / −3 2026-10-02: +38 / −3 2026-10-03: +44 / −1 2026-10-04: +56 / −1 2026-10-05: +45 / −2 2026-10-06: +38 / −0 2026-10-07: +39 / −2 2026-10-08: +44 / −5 2026-10-09: +28 / −3 2026-10-10: +39 / −7 2026-10-11: +47 / −4 2026-10-12: +35 / −3 2026-10-13: +37 / −2 2026-10-14: +36 / −2 2026-10-15: +42 / −2 2026-10-16: +30 / −1 2026-10-17: +35 / −2 2026-10-18: +30 / −3 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2020-062,39819092.7%
2020-072,74313695.3%
2020-081,0205495.0%
2020-096312396.5%
2020-101,5869094.6%
2020-112,9465698.1%
2020-121,2256894.7%
2021-011,1655495.6%
2021-028374395.1%
2021-037174294.5%
2021-045884293.3%
2021-051,0017393.2%
2021-061,0347393.4%
2021-071,1608992.9%
2021-081,0435794.8%
2021-091,1734796.1%
2021-102,63710496.2%
2021-111,6366196.4%
2021-121,3938994.0%
2022-011,5808195.1%
2022-028824395.4%
2022-036253894.3%
2022-048123795.6%
2022-059186293.7%
2022-068935194.6%
2022-071,0585195.4%
2022-088973696.1%
2022-097583695.5%
2022-106623994.4%
2022-111,0436494.2%
2022-121,0215495.0%
2023-011,1435695.3%
2023-028333596.0%
2023-038944795.0%
2023-048402996.7%
2023-059536094.1%
2023-066863595.1%
2023-071,0755994.8%
2023-089323996.0%
2023-099594395.7%
2023-108363596.0%
2023-111,0865295.4%
2023-121,2056994.6%
2024-011,3866995.3%
2024-021,0836094.8%
2024-031,0516494.3%
2024-049714495.7%
2024-059704895.3%
2024-061,0855495.3%
2024-071,3518993.8%
2024-089944196.0%
2024-099854196.0%
2024-107794394.8%
2024-111,0265794.7%
2024-121,6379694.5%
2025-011,6859294.8%
2025-021,1395695.3%
2025-031,4337794.9%
2025-041,0997393.8%
2025-059524695.4%
2025-061,1416294.8%
2025-071,5659394.4%
2025-081,2106594.9%
2025-091,0176294.3%
2025-101,1696894.5%
2025-111,0134695.7%
2025-121,1656694.6%
2026-011,3977395.0%
2026-029166093.9%
2026-031,2547294.6%
2026-041,2026095.2%
2026-051,1838893.1%
2026-061,3226695.2%
2026-071,4369793.7%
2026-081,0766194.6%
2026-091,0045894.5%
2026-106884693.7%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-19367
2026-09-20300
2026-09-21282
2026-09-22241
2026-09-23262
2026-09-24270
2026-09-25381
2026-09-26411
2026-09-27422
2026-09-28232
2026-09-29293
2026-09-30170
2026-10-01253
2026-10-02383
2026-10-03441
2026-10-04561
2026-10-05452
2026-10-06380
2026-10-07392
2026-10-08445
2026-10-09283
2026-10-10397
2026-10-11474
2026-10-12353
2026-10-13372
2026-10-14362
2026-10-15422
2026-10-16301
2026-10-17352
2026-10-18303
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days94.3%1,419
Last 180 days94.8%9,272
All time95.6%109,439
Japanese, last 180 days78.3%60
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About