SCARLET NEXUS
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played SCARLET NEXUS rate it? TrueGG Rating 71.3%

Release date: Jun 24, 2021 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it lower than Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours. Recent reviews are falling.

Good for

  • Players who want to soak in the world and atmosphere

Think twice if you are

  • Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding
  • Players buying right now (recent ratings are falling)

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
71.3%
▼ −9.0 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 10+ hours (last 180 days) · 275 reviews

TrueGG, all time
83.6%
Steam overall
80.3%
Japanese, all time
75.4%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 9.2% of all reviews. Their positive share is 61.3%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (10h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 10 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h35%171–2 h30%102–5 h62%295–10 h47%6210–20 h51%8120–50 h75%13150–100 h89%54100–200 h100%8200+ h100%1Positive share by playtime0–1 h1735%1–2 h1030%2–5 h2962%5–10 h6247%10–20 h8151%20–50 h13175%50–100 h5489%100–200 h8100%200+ h1100%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h35.3%0.0%17
1–2 h30.0%—10
2–5 h62.1%—29
5–10 h46.8%0.0%62
10–20 h50.6%—81
20–50 h74.8%66.7%131
50–100 h88.9%100.0%54
100–200 h100.0%—8
200+ h100.0%—1

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 45% had 20+ hours and 2% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

SCARLET NEXUS has a TrueGG Rating of 71.3%: the positive share among 275 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 10+ hours. That is 9.0 points below Steam's overall 80.3%, so players who really play the current version are harsher than the headline number suggests (all time: 83.6%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 9% of the total, with 61% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

Negative reviews most often mention boredom (more than at launch), grind, and updates and the developers (less than at launch). Positive reviews praise the world and atmosphere.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 75.4%, similar to all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (81.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Boring / repetitive, Grind). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Boring / repetitive33% of negative reviews (10% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch · 6 positive reviews say it improved
  • Grind16% of negative reviews (7% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
  • Updates & developers7% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · less than at launch

+ What players praise

  • World & atmosphere10% of positive reviews (5% of negative)
+ 超脳力+ ボリューム+ 不満点+ アジト+ 満足+ 可能+ 報酬+ 最高− stupid− poorly− cringe− tedious− weapons− tutorial− seem− care

Counted from 417 recent negative and 571 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating80.3%All time, all languages · 18,240 reviews
Adjusted rating81.0%Weighted by trust (95% range 80.5%–81.5%), +0.7pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews69.9%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−10.4pt vs overall) · 388 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review5%14%
Very short text18%15%
Key activated outside Steam28%34%
Received for free1%1%
Owns very few games3%2%
Over 100 reviews written13%14%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.840.80

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 22.4 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 2021-06: +2,342 / −469 2021-07: +1,459 / −204 2021-08: +669 / −139 2021-09: +413 / −57 2021-10: +253 / −49 2021-11: +506 / −46 2021-12: +262 / −43 2022-01: +172 / −41 2022-02: +147 / −37 2022-03: +337 / −73 2022-04: +145 / −30 2022-05: +129 / −28 2022-06: +146 / −40 2022-07: +114 / −31 2022-08: +210 / −56 2022-09: +153 / −44 2022-10: +161 / −45 2022-11: +256 / −57 2022-12: +238 / −39 2023-01: +267 / −73 2023-02: +232 / −60 2023-03: +157 / −41 2023-04: +124 / −24 2023-05: +79 / −25 2023-06: +124 / −32 2023-07: +131 / −45 2023-08: +90 / −24 2023-09: +71 / −24 2023-10: +165 / −61 2023-11: +129 / −35 2023-12: +156 / −43 2024-01: +130 / −53 2024-02: +68 / −24 2024-03: +115 / −31 2024-04: +129 / −50 2024-05: +101 / −25 2024-06: +87 / −28 2024-07: +104 / −41 2024-08: +72 / −36 2024-09: +59 / −30 2024-10: +63 / −70 2024-11: +51 / −22 2024-12: +91 / −39 2025-01: +67 / −23 2025-02: +51 / −23 2025-03: +47 / −25 2025-04: +30 / −22 2025-05: +54 / −19 2025-06: +68 / −27 2025-07: +41 / −17 2025-08: +57 / −15 2025-09: +36 / −14 2025-10: +61 / −21 2025-11: +42 / −14 2025-12: +43 / −20 2026-01: +47 / −18 2026-02: +40 / −13 2026-03: +40 / −14 2026-04: +47 / −20 2026-05: +32 / −19 2026-06: +38 / −24 2026-07: +28 / −18 2026-08: +29 / −19 2026-09: +29 / −7 2026-10: +21 / −6 2021/062022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 80.6% 2021-06: 83.3%2021-07: 87.7%2021-08: 82.8%2021-09: 87.9%2021-10: 83.8%2021-11: 91.7%2021-12: 85.9%2022-01: 80.8%2022-02: 79.9%2022-03: 82.2%2022-04: 82.9%2022-05: 82.2%2022-06: 78.5%2022-07: 78.6%2022-08: 78.9%2022-09: 77.7%2022-10: 78.2%2022-11: 81.8%2022-12: 85.9%2023-01: 78.5%2023-02: 79.5%2023-03: 79.3%2023-04: 83.8%2023-05: 76.0%2023-06: 79.5%2023-07: 74.4%2023-08: 78.9%2023-09: 74.7%2023-10: 73.0%2023-11: 78.7%2023-12: 78.4%2024-01: 71.0%2024-02: 73.9%2024-03: 78.8%2024-04: 72.1%2024-05: 80.2%2024-06: 75.7%2024-07: 71.7%2024-08: 66.7%2024-09: 66.3%2024-10: 47.4%2024-11: 69.9%2024-12: 70.0%2025-01: 74.4%2025-02: 68.9%2025-03: 65.3%2025-04: 57.7%2025-05: 74.0%2025-06: 71.6%2025-07: 70.7%2025-08: 79.2%2025-09: 72.0%2025-10: 74.4%2025-11: 75.0%2025-12: 68.3%2026-01: 72.3%2026-02: 75.5%2026-03: 74.1%2026-04: 70.1%2026-05: 62.7%2026-06: 61.3%2026-07: 60.9%2026-08: 60.4%2026-09: 80.6% 2021/062022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 2 4 6 2026-09-19: +3 / −0 2026-09-20: +1 / −0 2026-09-21: +5 / −0 2026-09-22: +0 / −0 2026-09-23: +0 / −0 2026-09-24: +1 / −1 2026-09-25: +0 / −1 2026-09-26: +3 / −0 2026-09-27: +0 / −1 2026-09-28: +0 / −0 2026-09-29: +2 / −0 2026-09-30: +2 / −0 2026-10-01: +1 / −0 2026-10-02: +0 / −1 2026-10-03: +4 / −0 2026-10-04: +1 / −0 2026-10-05: +1 / −0 2026-10-06: +1 / −0 2026-10-07: +1 / −0 2026-10-08: +0 / −0 2026-10-09: +1 / −0 2026-10-10: +3 / −0 2026-10-11: +0 / −0 2026-10-12: +1 / −1 2026-10-13: +0 / −0 2026-10-14: +3 / −1 2026-10-15: +2 / −1 2026-10-16: +0 / −0 2026-10-17: +0 / −1 2026-10-18: +2 / −1 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2021-062,34246983.3%
2021-071,45920487.7%
2021-0866913982.8%
2021-094135787.9%
2021-102534983.8%
2021-115064691.7%
2021-122624385.9%
2022-011724180.8%
2022-021473779.9%
2022-033377382.2%
2022-041453082.9%
2022-051292882.2%
2022-061464078.5%
2022-071143178.6%
2022-082105678.9%
2022-091534477.7%
2022-101614578.2%
2022-112565781.8%
2022-122383985.9%
2023-012677378.5%
2023-022326079.5%
2023-031574179.3%
2023-041242483.8%
2023-05792576.0%
2023-061243279.5%
2023-071314574.4%
2023-08902478.9%
2023-09712474.7%
2023-101656173.0%
2023-111293578.7%
2023-121564378.4%
2024-011305371.0%
2024-02682473.9%
2024-031153178.8%
2024-041295072.1%
2024-051012580.2%
2024-06872875.7%
2024-071044171.7%
2024-08723666.7%
2024-09593066.3%
2024-10637047.4%
2024-11512269.9%
2024-12913970.0%
2025-01672374.4%
2025-02512368.9%
2025-03472565.3%
2025-04302257.7%
2025-05541974.0%
2025-06682771.6%
2025-07411770.7%
2025-08571579.2%
2025-09361472.0%
2025-10612174.4%
2025-11421475.0%
2025-12432068.3%
2026-01471872.3%
2026-02401375.5%
2026-03401474.1%
2026-04472070.1%
2026-05321962.7%
2026-06382461.3%
2026-07281860.9%
2026-08291960.4%
2026-0929780.6%
2026-1021677.8%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1930
2026-09-2010
2026-09-2150
2026-09-2200
2026-09-2300
2026-09-2411
2026-09-2501
2026-09-2630
2026-09-2701
2026-09-2800
2026-09-2920
2026-09-3020
2026-10-0110
2026-10-0201
2026-10-0340
2026-10-0410
2026-10-0510
2026-10-0610
2026-10-0710
2026-10-0800
2026-10-0910
2026-10-1030
2026-10-1100
2026-10-1211
2026-10-1300
2026-10-1431
2026-10-1521
2026-10-1600
2026-10-1701
2026-10-1821
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days82.0%61
Last 180 days64.1%393
All time80.3%18,240
Japanese, last 180 days61.5%13
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About