KurtzPel
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played KurtzPel rate it? TrueGG Rating 60.8%

Release date: Apr 30, 2019 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours. Recent reviews are falling.

Think twice if you are

  • Players buying on the promise of future updates (complaints about the developers)
  • Players wary of microtransactions and DLC
  • Players buying right now (recent ratings are falling)

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
60.8%
± 0.5 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 5+ hours (all time) · 20,437 reviews

TrueGG, all time
60.8%
Steam overall
60.4%
Japanese, all time
36.1%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 19.8% of all reviews. Their positive share is 55.8%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (5h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 5 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h55%3,7821–2 h57%2,9732–5 h63%6,9435–10 h67%5,66210–20 h67%4,75520–50 h67%4,46350–100 h57%2,054100–200 h47%1,367200+ h32%2,136Positive share by playtime0–1 h3,78255%1–2 h2,97357%2–5 h6,94363%5–10 h5,66267%10–20 h4,75567%20–50 h4,46367%50–100 h2,05457%100–200 h1,36747%200+ h2,13632%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (all time). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h55.2%33.3%3,782
1–2 h56.5%37.5%2,973
2–5 h63.4%36.0%6,943
5–10 h66.6%42.4%5,662
10–20 h67.2%48.6%4,755
20–50 h66.7%55.9%4,463
50–100 h57.0%36.8%2,054
100–200 h46.7%25.6%1,367
200+ h31.7%17.6%2,136

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 5+ hours. 29% had 20+ hours and 10% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

KurtzPel has a TrueGG Rating of 60.8%, based on all-time reviews from players with 5+ hours (20,437 reviews) because recent reviews are few. Steam's overall rating is 60.4%.

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 20% of the total, with 56% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

In the last 180 days, approval peaks at 67% around 10–20h and falls to 32% at 200h+: in the current version, long-time players are harsher.

Negative reviews most often mention updates and the developers (more than at launch), monetization and DLC (less than at launch), and バランス.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 36.1%, 24.7 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (57.9% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on live operations and online play (Updates & developers, Monetization & DLC, Balance). These shift over time, so weigh recent reviews more than the all-time figure.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Updates & developers22% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch
  • Monetization & DLC20% of negative reviews (7% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · less than at launch
  • Balance9% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · ongoing since launch
  • Boring / repetitive8% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

No standout topics

+ create+ action+ fast+ combo+ leave+ genshin+ yes+ battles− worse− クソゲー− devs− ruined− trash− garbage− ユーザー− boring

Counted from 507 recent negative and 417 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating60.4%All time, all languages · 33,919 reviews
Adjusted rating57.9%Weighted by trust (95% range 56.7%–59.0%), −2.5pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews36.1%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−24.3pt vs overall) · 324 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review20%18%
Very short text36%22%
Key activated outside Steam0%0%
Received for free0%0%
Owns very few games9%7%
Over 100 reviews written13%9%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.750.83

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 12.8 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 2019-04: +187 / −214 2019-05: +1,214 / −998 2019-06: +3,210 / −2,004 2019-07: +2,533 / −1,265 2019-08: +555 / −586 2019-09: +340 / −297 2019-10: +482 / −383 2019-11: +3,225 / −601 2019-12: +1,312 / −294 2020-01: +901 / −1,504 2020-02: +554 / −504 2020-03: +706 / −385 2020-04: +564 / −392 2020-05: +481 / −383 2020-06: +372 / −267 2020-07: +549 / −399 2020-08: +491 / −275 2020-09: +416 / −212 2020-10: +225 / −147 2020-11: +328 / −132 2020-12: +334 / −115 2021-01: +378 / −138 2021-02: +295 / −100 2021-03: +287 / −117 2021-04: +328 / −114 2021-05: +291 / −120 2021-06: +241 / −94 2021-07: +211 / −139 2021-08: +197 / −132 2021-09: +145 / −94 2021-10: +158 / −92 2021-11: +141 / −95 2021-12: +127 / −106 2022-01: +136 / −128 2022-02: +112 / −74 2022-03: +112 / −82 2022-04: +98 / −63 2022-05: +67 / −63 2022-06: +72 / −63 2022-07: +71 / −86 2022-08: +57 / −61 2022-09: +42 / −43 2022-10: +37 / −44 2022-11: +45 / −25 2022-12: +45 / −109 2023-01: +32 / −62 2023-02: +31 / −26 2023-03: +39 / −32 2023-04: +41 / −38 2023-05: +30 / −31 2023-06: +42 / −36 2023-07: +36 / −43 2023-08: +22 / −30 2023-09: +22 / −22 2023-10: +29 / −23 2023-11: +25 / −24 2023-12: +25 / −29 2024-01: +28 / −33 2024-02: +29 / −29 2024-03: +27 / −30 2024-04: +15 / −27 2024-05: +16 / −27 2024-06: +13 / −28 2024-07: +14 / −19 2024-08: +23 / −22 2024-09: +14 / −13 2024-10: +20 / −23 2024-11: +18 / −19 2024-12: +14 / −16 2025-01: +17 / −16 2025-02: +11 / −13 2025-03: +13 / −18 2025-04: +14 / −18 2025-05: +8 / −16 2025-06: +11 / −17 2025-07: +9 / −22 2025-08: +9 / −5 2025-09: +6 / −7 2025-10: +3 / −16 2025-11: +13 / −10 2025-12: +5 / −13 2026-01: +3 / −16 2026-02: +3 / −10 2026-03: +8 / −10 2026-04: +4 / −6 2026-05: +6 / −14 2026-06: +10 / −9 2026-07: +16 / −9 2026-08: +9 / −8 2026-09: +8 / −7 2026-10: +4 / −4 2019/042020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 61.8% 2019-04: 46.6%2019-05: 54.9%2019-06: 61.6%2019-07: 66.7%2019-08: 48.6%2019-09: 53.4%2019-10: 55.7%2019-11: 84.3%2019-12: 81.7%2020-01: 37.5%2020-02: 52.4%2020-03: 64.7%2020-04: 59.0%2020-05: 55.7%2020-06: 58.2%2020-07: 57.9%2020-08: 64.1%2020-09: 66.2%2020-10: 60.5%2020-11: 71.3%2020-12: 74.4%2021-01: 73.3%2021-02: 74.7%2021-03: 71.0%2021-04: 74.2%2021-05: 70.8%2021-06: 71.9%2021-07: 60.3%2021-08: 59.9%2021-09: 60.7%2021-10: 63.2%2021-11: 59.7%2021-12: 54.5%2022-01: 51.5%2022-02: 60.2%2022-03: 57.7%2022-04: 60.9%2022-05: 51.5%2022-06: 53.3%2022-07: 45.2%2022-08: 48.3%2022-09: 49.4%2022-10: 45.7%2022-11: 64.3%2022-12: 29.2%2023-01: 34.0%2023-02: 54.4%2023-03: 54.9%2023-04: 51.9%2023-05: 49.2%2023-06: 53.8%2023-07: 45.6%2023-08: 42.3%2023-09: 50.0%2023-10: 55.8%2023-11: 51.0%2023-12: 46.3%2024-01: 45.9%2024-02: 50.0%2024-03: 47.4%2024-04: 35.7%2024-05: 37.2%2024-06: 31.7%2024-07: 42.4%2024-08: 51.1%2024-10: 46.5%2024-11: 48.6%2024-12: 46.7%2025-01: 51.5%2025-03: 41.9%2025-04: 43.8%2025-07: 29.0% 2019/042020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2026-09-19: +0 / −0 2026-09-20: +0 / −0 2026-09-21: +2 / −0 2026-09-22: +0 / −0 2026-09-23: +0 / −0 2026-09-24: +0 / −0 2026-09-25: +1 / −1 2026-09-26: +0 / −0 2026-09-27: +0 / −1 2026-09-28: +0 / −0 2026-09-29: +0 / −0 2026-09-30: +0 / −0 2026-10-01: +0 / −0 2026-10-02: +0 / −0 2026-10-03: +2 / −0 2026-10-04: +0 / −1 2026-10-05: +1 / −0 2026-10-06: +0 / −0 2026-10-07: +0 / −0 2026-10-08: +0 / −0 2026-10-09: +0 / −1 2026-10-10: +1 / −0 2026-10-11: +0 / −0 2026-10-12: +0 / −0 2026-10-13: +0 / −0 2026-10-14: +0 / −0 2026-10-15: +0 / −0 2026-10-16: +0 / −0 2026-10-17: +0 / −0 2026-10-18: +0 / −2 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2019-0418721446.6%
2019-051,21499854.9%
2019-063,2102,00461.6%
2019-072,5331,26566.7%
2019-0855558648.6%
2019-0934029753.4%
2019-1048238355.7%
2019-113,22560184.3%
2019-121,31229481.7%
2020-019011,50437.5%
2020-0255450452.4%
2020-0370638564.7%
2020-0456439259.0%
2020-0548138355.7%
2020-0637226758.2%
2020-0754939957.9%
2020-0849127564.1%
2020-0941621266.2%
2020-1022514760.5%
2020-1132813271.3%
2020-1233411574.4%
2021-0137813873.3%
2021-0229510074.7%
2021-0328711771.0%
2021-0432811474.2%
2021-0529112070.8%
2021-062419471.9%
2021-0721113960.3%
2021-0819713259.9%
2021-091459460.7%
2021-101589263.2%
2021-111419559.7%
2021-1212710654.5%
2022-0113612851.5%
2022-021127460.2%
2022-031128257.7%
2022-04986360.9%
2022-05676351.5%
2022-06726353.3%
2022-07718645.2%
2022-08576148.3%
2022-09424349.4%
2022-10374445.7%
2022-11452564.3%
2022-124510929.2%
2023-01326234.0%
2023-02312654.4%
2023-03393254.9%
2023-04413851.9%
2023-05303149.2%
2023-06423653.8%
2023-07364345.6%
2023-08223042.3%
2023-09222250.0%
2023-10292355.8%
2023-11252451.0%
2023-12252946.3%
2024-01283345.9%
2024-02292950.0%
2024-03273047.4%
2024-04152735.7%
2024-05162737.2%
2024-06132831.7%
2024-07141942.4%
2024-08232251.1%
2024-09141351.9%
2024-10202346.5%
2024-11181948.6%
2024-12141646.7%
2025-01171651.5%
2025-02111345.8%
2025-03131841.9%
2025-04141843.8%
2025-0581633.3%
2025-06111739.3%
2025-0792229.0%
2025-089564.3%
2025-096746.2%
2025-1031615.8%
2025-11131056.5%
2025-1251327.8%
2026-0131615.8%
2026-0231023.1%
2026-0381044.4%
2026-044640.0%
2026-0561430.0%
2026-0610952.6%
2026-0716964.0%
2026-089852.9%
2026-098753.3%
2026-104450.0%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1900
2026-09-2000
2026-09-2120
2026-09-2200
2026-09-2300
2026-09-2400
2026-09-2511
2026-09-2600
2026-09-2701
2026-09-2800
2026-09-2900
2026-09-3000
2026-10-0100
2026-10-0200
2026-10-0320
2026-10-0401
2026-10-0510
2026-10-0600
2026-10-0700
2026-10-0800
2026-10-0901
2026-10-1010
2026-10-1100
2026-10-1200
2026-10-1300
2026-10-1400
2026-10-1500
2026-10-1600
2026-10-1700
2026-10-1802
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days53.9%13
Last 180 days48.1%106
All time60.4%33,919
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About