How do players who really played GOD EATER 3 rate it? TrueGG Rating 85.3%
Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks.
Good for
- Players willing to push through a slow start
Think twice if you are
- Players who judge a game in the first hours (early ratings are lower)
- Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
- Players particular about controls and UI
A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How
vs Steam overall
Positive among players with 10+ hours (all time) · 6,500 reviews
- TrueGG, all time
- 85.3%
- Steam overall
- 79.3%
- Japanese, all time
- 71.2%
Early wall
Reviews written under 2 hours: 10.4% of all reviews. Their positive share is 41.0%.
This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).
Does the rating change the longer people play?
Positive share by playtime at the time of review (all time). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.
Show chart values as a table
| Playtime | Positive | Japanese | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 h | 37.8% | 9.7% | 635 |
| 1–2 h | 46.1% | 29.4% | 408 |
| 2–5 h | 76.4% | 54.8% | 1,151 |
| 5–10 h | 82.2% | 50.0% | 1,340 |
| 10–20 h | 83.1% | 67.4% | 1,794 |
| 20–50 h | 84.4% | 66.5% | 3,039 |
| 50–100 h | 88.9% | 78.3% | 1,255 |
| 100–200 h | 91.4% | 87.5% | 324 |
| 200+ h | 87.5% | 50.0% | 88 |
How long people play: half of reviewers had played 10+ hours. 47% had 20+ hours and 4% had 100+ hours (all time).
Summary
GOD EATER 3 has a TrueGG Rating of 85.3%, based on all-time reviews from players with 10+ hours (6,500 reviews) because recent reviews are few. Steam's overall rating is 79.3%.
Reviews written under 2 hours make up 10% of the total, and only 41% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.
In the last 180 days, reviews at 2–5h are 76% positive versus 91% at 100–200h: the more people play, the more they like it.
Negative reviews most often mention boredom (more than at launch), controls and UI, and grind (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.
Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 71.2%, 14.0 points below all languages.
Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (80.3% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.
All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.
Why it is rated this way
Complaints center on the game's design (Boring / repetitive, Controls, UI & camera, Grind, Movement & pacing). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).
− Most mentioned complaints
- Boring / repetitive22% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch
- Controls, UI & camera22% of negative reviews (9% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
- Grind12% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
- Movement & pacing11% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
- Performance7% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · less than at launch
+ What players praise
- Fun & feel36% of positive reviews (21% of negative)
Counted from 501 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count
Checking the numbers
Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.
| Metric | Positive | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Official Steam rating | 79.3% | All time, all languages · 9,997 reviews |
| Adjusted rating | 80.3% | Weighted by trust (95% range 79.7%–81.0%), +1.0pt vs official |
| Japanese-language reviews | 64.1% | All time, Japanese-language reviews (−15.2pt vs overall) · 560 reviews |
Show the positive vs negative breakdown
Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.
| Condition | Positive reviews | Negative reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 hours played at review | 6% | 26% |
| Very short text | 27% | 13% |
| Key activated outside Steam | 16% | 25% |
| Received for free | 2% | 1% |
| Owns very few games | 5% | 3% |
| Over 100 reviews written | 10% | 16% |
| Average trust (1.0 = full) | 0.82 | 0.77 |
The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 21 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19
When did the rating change?
Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.
Reviews per month
Positive share per month
Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.
Reviews per day, last 30 days
Show monthly data as a table
| Month | Positive | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02 | 1,247 | 323 | 79.4% |
| 2019-03 | 115 | 33 | 77.7% |
| 2019-04 | 37 | 11 | 77.1% |
| 2019-05 | 58 | 12 | 82.9% |
| 2019-06 | 162 | 17 | 90.5% |
| 2019-07 | 169 | 24 | 87.6% |
| 2019-08 | 32 | 5 | 86.5% |
| 2019-09 | 34 | 21 | 61.8% |
| 2019-10 | 31 | 6 | 83.8% |
| 2019-11 | 256 | 18 | 93.4% |
| 2019-12 | 143 | 13 | 91.7% |
| 2020-01 | 76 | 13 | 85.4% |
| 2020-02 | 66 | 8 | 89.2% |
| 2020-03 | 43 | 6 | 87.8% |
| 2020-04 | 44 | 3 | 93.6% |
| 2020-05 | 132 | 21 | 86.3% |
| 2020-06 | 101 | 21 | 82.8% |
| 2020-07 | 92 | 34 | 73.0% |
| 2020-08 | 28 | 11 | 71.8% |
| 2020-09 | 32 | 2 | 94.1% |
| 2020-10 | 42 | 5 | 89.4% |
| 2020-11 | 103 | 11 | 90.4% |
| 2020-12 | 114 | 28 | 80.3% |
| 2021-01 | 78 | 28 | 73.6% |
| 2021-02 | 80 | 15 | 84.2% |
| 2021-03 | 42 | 11 | 79.2% |
| 2021-04 | 31 | 4 | 88.6% |
| 2021-05 | 277 | 66 | 80.8% |
| 2021-06 | 150 | 37 | 80.2% |
| 2021-07 | 149 | 30 | 83.2% |
| 2021-08 | 96 | 33 | 74.4% |
| 2021-09 | 64 | 17 | 79.0% |
| 2021-10 | 58 | 16 | 78.4% |
| 2021-11 | 63 | 16 | 79.7% |
| 2021-12 | 83 | 24 | 77.6% |
| 2022-01 | 61 | 10 | 85.9% |
| 2022-02 | 44 | 4 | 91.7% |
| 2022-03 | 43 | 4 | 91.5% |
| 2022-04 | 65 | 31 | 67.7% |
| 2022-05 | 67 | 13 | 83.8% |
| 2022-06 | 53 | 12 | 81.5% |
| 2022-07 | 47 | 23 | 67.1% |
| 2022-08 | 33 | 14 | 70.2% |
| 2022-09 | 31 | 15 | 67.4% |
| 2022-10 | 44 | 21 | 67.7% |
| 2022-11 | 45 | 13 | 77.6% |
| 2022-12 | 30 | 14 | 68.2% |
| 2023-01 | 43 | 8 | 84.3% |
| 2023-02 | 31 | 10 | 75.6% |
| 2023-03 | 46 | 13 | 78.0% |
| 2023-04 | 52 | 13 | 80.0% |
| 2023-05 | 24 | 4 | 85.7% |
| 2023-06 | 45 | 10 | 81.8% |
| 2023-07 | 41 | 9 | 82.0% |
| 2023-08 | 43 | 27 | 61.4% |
| 2023-09 | 21 | 7 | 75.0% |
| 2023-10 | 42 | 15 | 73.7% |
| 2023-11 | 29 | 10 | 74.4% |
| 2023-12 | 41 | 13 | 75.9% |
| 2024-01 | 29 | 7 | 80.6% |
| 2024-02 | 95 | 30 | 76.0% |
| 2024-03 | 72 | 18 | 80.0% |
| 2024-04 | 34 | 10 | 77.3% |
| 2024-05 | 38 | 8 | 82.6% |
| 2024-06 | 54 | 18 | 75.0% |
| 2024-07 | 40 | 9 | 81.6% |
| 2024-08 | 28 | 7 | 80.0% |
| 2024-09 | 27 | 9 | 75.0% |
| 2024-10 | 24 | 51 | 32.0% |
| 2024-11 | 43 | 9 | 82.7% |
| 2024-12 | 55 | 18 | 75.3% |
| 2025-01 | 25 | 17 | 59.5% |
| 2025-02 | 20 | 15 | 57.1% |
| 2025-03 | 34 | 7 | 82.9% |
| 2025-04 | 35 | 5 | 87.5% |
| 2025-05 | 24 | 5 | 82.8% |
| 2025-06 | 47 | 33 | 58.8% |
| 2025-07 | 33 | 10 | 76.7% |
| 2025-08 | 32 | 16 | 66.7% |
| 2025-09 | 22 | 3 | 88.0% |
| 2025-10 | 36 | 13 | 73.5% |
| 2025-11 | 28 | 5 | 84.8% |
| 2025-12 | 20 | 6 | 76.9% |
| 2026-01 | 38 | 7 | 84.4% |
| 2026-02 | 21 | 12 | 63.6% |
| 2026-03 | 31 | 5 | 86.1% |
| 2026-04 | 23 | 4 | 85.2% |
| 2026-05 | 31 | 10 | 75.6% |
| 2026-06 | 23 | 3 | 88.5% |
| 2026-07 | 32 | 8 | 80.0% |
| 2026-08 | 19 | 7 | 73.1% |
| 2026-09 | 24 | 7 | 77.4% |
| 2026-10 | 12 | 3 | 80.0% |
Show daily data as a table
| Day | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-09-20 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-21 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026-09-22 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-23 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-09-24 | 2 | 0 |
| 2026-09-25 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-26 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-27 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-09-28 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-29 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-09-30 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-10-01 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-02 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-10-03 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-04 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-05 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-06 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-07 | 1 | 1 |
| 2026-10-08 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-09 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-11 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-12 | 3 | 0 |
| 2026-10-13 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-14 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026-10-15 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-16 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-17 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-10-18 | 1 | 0 |
Recent sentiment
| Period | Positive | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Last 30 days | 73.7% | 38 |
| Last 180 days | 78.4% | 218 |
| All time | 79.3% | 9,997 |
| Japanese, last 180 days | 66.7% | 27 |
See also
Rankings that include this game
Games with a similar rating profile
Dead Rising 3 Apocalypse Edition TrueGG 84.9% · Steam 77.1% 
DayZ TrueGG 87.6% · Steam 77.9% 
Sword Art Online: Fatal Bullet TrueGG 83.4% · Steam 78.9% 
REMNANT II TrueGG 85.3% · Steam 82.2% Image: Steam store (© respective owners)
Check another game
About this verdict
Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.
Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.
If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About