Judgment
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Judgment rate it? TrueGG Rating 93.3%

Release date: Sep 14, 2022 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours.

Good for

  • Players who want fun from the first hours
  • Players who want dozens of hours of play

Think twice if you are

  • Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
  • Players who want a brisk pace
  • Players who dislike repetitive grinding

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
93.3%
± 0.5 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 748 reviews

TrueGG, all time
95.6%
Steam overall
93.9%
Japanese, all time
91.5%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 4.0% of all reviews. Their positive share is 87.1%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h55%111–2 h67%62–5 h89%445–10 h68%6910–20 h81%7520–50 h93%42550–100 h94%261100–200 h95%57200+ h80%5Positive share by playtime0–1 h1155%1–2 h667%2–5 h4489%5–10 h6968%10–20 h7581%20–50 h42593%50–100 h26194%100–200 h5795%200+ h580%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h54.5%—11
1–2 h66.7%—6
2–5 h88.6%0.0%44
5–10 h68.1%—69
10–20 h81.3%—75
20–50 h92.9%88.2%425
50–100 h93.9%90.0%261
100–200 h94.7%100.0%57
200+ h80.0%—5

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 73% had 20+ hours and 5% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Judgment has a TrueGG Rating of 93.3%: the positive share among 748 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours, close to Steam's overall 93.9%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 95.6%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 4% of the total, with 87% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

Negative reviews most often mention boredom (more than at launch), pacing (more than at launch), and grind (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 91.5%, similar to all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (93.6% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Boring / repetitive, Movement & pacing, Grind, Controls, UI & camera). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Boring / repetitive29% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
  • Movement & pacing18% of negative reviews (8% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch · 6 positive reviews say it improved
  • Grind14% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · more than at launch · 5 positive reviews say it improved
  • Crashes & bugs11% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · less than at launch
  • Controls, UI & camera9% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel32% of positive reviews (21% of negative)
+ 最高+ 素晴+ キャラクター+ 事件+ グラフィック+ 八神隆之+ 期待+ 魅力的− seem− none− apparently− boring− awful− except− couldn't− spent

Counted from 342 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating93.9%All time, all languages · 12,366 reviews
Adjusted rating93.6%Weighted by trust (95% range 93.3%–93.7%), −0.3pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews87.6%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−6.2pt vs overall) · 371 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review1%7%
Very short text25%8%
Key activated outside Steam27%24%
Received for free1%0%
Owns very few games5%2%
Over 100 reviews written10%14%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.820.86

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 39.5 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 500 1,000 1,500 2022-09: +1,211 / −66 2022-10: +600 / −28 2022-11: +557 / −18 2022-12: +313 / −24 2023-01: +380 / −18 2023-02: +195 / −9 2023-03: +182 / −14 2023-04: +152 / −8 2023-05: +176 / −11 2023-06: +101 / −8 2023-07: +257 / −21 2023-08: +142 / −10 2023-09: +135 / −6 2023-10: +105 / −6 2023-11: +141 / −14 2023-12: +203 / −14 2024-01: +195 / −10 2024-02: +145 / −9 2024-03: +148 / −13 2024-04: +117 / −17 2024-05: +141 / −14 2024-06: +91 / −8 2024-07: +165 / −12 2024-08: +113 / −12 2024-09: +160 / −12 2024-10: +188 / −17 2024-11: +237 / −18 2024-12: +172 / −21 2025-01: +176 / −20 2025-02: +147 / −25 2025-03: +134 / −10 2025-04: +85 / −11 2025-05: +116 / −14 2025-06: +104 / −12 2025-07: +149 / −12 2025-08: +126 / −3 2025-09: +108 / −6 2025-10: +151 / −13 2025-11: +113 / −8 2025-12: +153 / −14 2026-01: +107 / −13 2026-02: +103 / −8 2026-03: +99 / −11 2026-04: +88 / −11 2026-05: +97 / −11 2026-06: +111 / −19 2026-07: +114 / −14 2026-08: +97 / −20 2026-09: +109 / −18 2026-10: +67 / −5 2022/092023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 92.8% 2022-09: 94.8%2022-10: 95.5%2022-11: 96.9%2022-12: 92.9%2023-01: 95.5%2023-02: 95.6%2023-03: 92.9%2023-04: 95.0%2023-05: 94.1%2023-06: 92.7%2023-07: 92.4%2023-08: 93.4%2023-09: 95.7%2023-10: 94.6%2023-11: 91.0%2023-12: 93.5%2024-01: 95.1%2024-02: 94.2%2024-03: 91.9%2024-04: 87.3%2024-05: 91.0%2024-06: 91.9%2024-07: 93.2%2024-08: 90.4%2024-09: 93.0%2024-10: 91.7%2024-11: 92.9%2024-12: 89.1%2025-01: 89.8%2025-02: 85.5%2025-03: 93.1%2025-04: 88.5%2025-05: 89.2%2025-06: 89.7%2025-07: 92.5%2025-08: 97.7%2025-09: 94.7%2025-10: 92.1%2025-11: 93.4%2025-12: 91.6%2026-01: 89.2%2026-02: 92.8%2026-03: 90.0%2026-04: 88.9%2026-05: 89.8%2026-06: 85.4%2026-07: 89.1%2026-08: 82.9%2026-09: 85.8%2026-10: 93.1% 2022/092023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 2 4 6 8 2026-09-19: +6 / −0 2026-09-20: +2 / −1 2026-09-21: +0 / −1 2026-09-22: +6 / −0 2026-09-23: +2 / −0 2026-09-24: +0 / −0 2026-09-25: +1 / −0 2026-09-26: +1 / −0 2026-09-27: +4 / −1 2026-09-28: +2 / −1 2026-09-29: +3 / −0 2026-09-30: +3 / −1 2026-10-01: +0 / −0 2026-10-02: +0 / −0 2026-10-03: +2 / −0 2026-10-04: +6 / −0 2026-10-05: +6 / −1 2026-10-06: +5 / −1 2026-10-07: +2 / −0 2026-10-08: +3 / −0 2026-10-09: +0 / −0 2026-10-10: +7 / −1 2026-10-11: +2 / −0 2026-10-12: +6 / −0 2026-10-13: +6 / −0 2026-10-14: +5 / −0 2026-10-15: +2 / −0 2026-10-16: +6 / −0 2026-10-17: +1 / −2 2026-10-18: +8 / −0 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2022-091,2116694.8%
2022-106002895.5%
2022-115571896.9%
2022-123132492.9%
2023-013801895.5%
2023-02195995.6%
2023-031821492.9%
2023-04152895.0%
2023-051761194.1%
2023-06101892.7%
2023-072572192.4%
2023-081421093.4%
2023-09135695.7%
2023-10105694.6%
2023-111411491.0%
2023-122031493.5%
2024-011951095.1%
2024-02145994.2%
2024-031481391.9%
2024-041171787.3%
2024-051411491.0%
2024-0691891.9%
2024-071651293.2%
2024-081131290.4%
2024-091601293.0%
2024-101881791.7%
2024-112371892.9%
2024-121722189.1%
2025-011762089.8%
2025-021472585.5%
2025-031341093.1%
2025-04851188.5%
2025-051161489.2%
2025-061041289.7%
2025-071491292.5%
2025-08126397.7%
2025-09108694.7%
2025-101511392.1%
2025-11113893.4%
2025-121531491.6%
2026-011071389.2%
2026-02103892.8%
2026-03991190.0%
2026-04881188.9%
2026-05971189.8%
2026-061111985.4%
2026-071141489.1%
2026-08972082.9%
2026-091091885.8%
2026-1067593.1%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1960
2026-09-2021
2026-09-2101
2026-09-2260
2026-09-2320
2026-09-2400
2026-09-2510
2026-09-2610
2026-09-2741
2026-09-2821
2026-09-2930
2026-09-3031
2026-10-0100
2026-10-0200
2026-10-0320
2026-10-0460
2026-10-0561
2026-10-0651
2026-10-0720
2026-10-0830
2026-10-0900
2026-10-1071
2026-10-1120
2026-10-1260
2026-10-1360
2026-10-1450
2026-10-1520
2026-10-1660
2026-10-1712
2026-10-1880
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days91.5%141
Last 180 days89.7%952
All time93.9%12,366
Japanese, last 180 days87.1%31
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About