How do players who really played Content Warning rate it? TrueGG Rating 90.5%
Players who really played rate it lower than Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours. Recent reviews are falling.
Good for
- Players who want fun from the first hours
Think twice if you are
- Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
- Players who want variety (reports that it gets monotonous)
- Players buying right now (recent ratings are falling)
A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How
vs Steam overall
Positive among players with 2+ hours (last 180 days) · 8,139 reviews
- TrueGG, all time
- 94.8%
- Steam overall
- 93.8%
- Japanese, all time
- 88.6%
Early wall
Reviews written under 2 hours: 17.2% of all reviews. Their positive share is 88.8%.
This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).
Does the rating change the longer people play?
Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.
Show chart values as a table
| Playtime | Positive | Japanese | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 h | 61.3% | 100.0% | 395 |
| 1–2 h | 68.9% | — | 486 |
| 2–5 h | 89.0% | 76.9% | 2,739 |
| 5–10 h | 91.2% | 75.0% | 2,276 |
| 10–20 h | 91.5% | 100.0% | 1,696 |
| 20–50 h | 91.3% | — | 1,075 |
| 50–100 h | 91.7% | 50.0% | 264 |
| 100–200 h | 88.7% | 100.0% | 71 |
| 200+ h | 94.4% | — | 18 |
How long people play: half of reviewers had played 2+ hours. 11% had 20+ hours and 1% had 100+ hours (all time).
Summary
Content Warning has a TrueGG Rating of 90.5%: the positive share among 8,139 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 2+ hours, close to Steam's overall 93.8%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 94.8%).
Reviews written under 2 hours make up 17% of the total, with 89% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.
Beyond the first hours, approval is fairly even across playtime.
Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs, boredom, and updates and the developers.
Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 88.6%, similar to all languages.
Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (93.6% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.
All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.
Why it is rated this way
Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too.
− Most mentioned complaints
- Crashes & bugs17% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among 20–100h players · ongoing since launch
- Boring / repetitive16% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · ongoing since launch
- Updates & developers11% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · ongoing since launch
+ What players praise
No standout topics
Counted from 353 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count
Checking the numbers
Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.
| Metric | Positive | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Official Steam rating | 93.8% | All time, all languages · 163,997 reviews |
| Adjusted rating | 93.6% | Weighted by trust (95% range 93.3%–93.9%), −0.2pt vs official |
| Japanese-language reviews | 88.2% | All time, Japanese-language reviews (−5.6pt vs overall) · 448 reviews |
Show the positive vs negative breakdown
Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.
| Condition | Positive reviews | Negative reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 hours played at review | 8% | 30% |
| Very short text | 49% | 27% |
| Key activated outside Steam | 29% | 31% |
| Received for free | 9% | 14% |
| Owns very few games | 18% | 10% |
| Over 100 reviews written | 1% | 2% |
| Average trust (1.0 = full) | 0.68 | 0.70 |
The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 7.1 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19
When did the rating change?
Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.
Reviews per month
Positive share per month
Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.
Updates and ratings before and after
| Date | Announcement | 2 months before → after |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | Patch Notes 1.24.0 | 91% → 90% (−0.9pt) |
Picked automatically from the titles of Steam announcements by the developer (one per month, last 3 years, up to 10). The dotted lines mark those months. Before and after are the positive rates of the two months before and after (excluding the month itself); shown as "—" under 50 reviews or when the two months after are not complete. An update is not necessarily the cause of a change.
Reviews per day, last 30 days
Show monthly data as a table
| Month | Positive | Negative | Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04 | 10,676 | 880 | 92.4% |
| 2024-05 | 7,996 | 453 | 94.6% |
| 2024-06 | 4,978 | 345 | 93.5% |
| 2024-07 | 4,546 | 310 | 93.6% |
| 2024-08 | 3,270 | 205 | 94.1% |
| 2024-09 | 2,267 | 178 | 92.7% |
| 2024-10 | 1,849 | 130 | 93.4% |
| 2024-11 | 5,425 | 152 | 97.3% |
| 2024-12 | 4,556 | 225 | 95.3% |
| 2025-01 | 2,933 | 175 | 94.4% |
| 2025-02 | 2,627 | 162 | 94.2% |
| 2025-03 | 2,282 | 212 | 91.5% |
| 2025-04 | 1,313 | 128 | 91.1% |
| 2025-05 | 1,069 | 106 | 91.0% |
| 2025-06 | 997 | 128 | 88.6% |
| 2025-07 | 1,045 | 110 | 90.5% |
| 2025-08 | 1,019 | 100 | 91.1% |
| 2025-09 | 641 | 71 | 90.0% |
| 2025-10 | 813 | 117 | 87.4% |
| 2025-11 | 946 | 138 | 87.3% |
| 2025-12 | 946 | 157 | 85.8% |
| 2026-01 | 1,073 | 162 | 86.9% |
| 2026-02 | 857 | 80 | 91.5% |
| 2026-03 | 973 | 97 | 90.9% |
| 2026-04 | 1,390 | 166 | 89.3% |
| 2026-05 | 1,181 | 117 | 91.0% |
| 2026-06 | 1,080 | 125 | 89.6% |
| 2026-07 | 1,287 | 208 | 86.1% |
| 2026-08 | 868 | 103 | 89.4% |
| 2026-09 | 679 | 98 | 87.4% |
| 2026-10 | 367 | 42 | 89.7% |
Show daily data as a table
| Day | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 | 23 | 3 |
| 2026-09-20 | 16 | 4 |
| 2026-09-21 | 23 | 3 |
| 2026-09-22 | 12 | 1 |
| 2026-09-23 | 16 | 2 |
| 2026-09-24 | 16 | 1 |
| 2026-09-25 | 18 | 7 |
| 2026-09-26 | 25 | 5 |
| 2026-09-27 | 31 | 2 |
| 2026-09-28 | 16 | 2 |
| 2026-09-29 | 15 | 4 |
| 2026-09-30 | 19 | 1 |
| 2026-10-01 | 6 | 3 |
| 2026-10-02 | 15 | 4 |
| 2026-10-03 | 27 | 1 |
| 2026-10-04 | 30 | 2 |
| 2026-10-05 | 23 | 0 |
| 2026-10-06 | 16 | 3 |
| 2026-10-07 | 22 | 2 |
| 2026-10-08 | 11 | 1 |
| 2026-10-09 | 15 | 3 |
| 2026-10-10 | 31 | 1 |
| 2026-10-11 | 29 | 5 |
| 2026-10-12 | 24 | 4 |
| 2026-10-13 | 12 | 1 |
| 2026-10-14 | 7 | 1 |
| 2026-10-15 | 18 | 2 |
| 2026-10-16 | 16 | 0 |
| 2026-10-17 | 38 | 4 |
| 2026-10-18 | 27 | 5 |
Recent sentiment
| Period | Positive | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Last 30 days | 88.2% | 945 |
| Last 180 days | 88.1% | 8,978 |
| All time | 93.8% | 163,997 |
| Japanese, last 180 days | 82.1% | 28 |
See also
Rankings that include this game
Games with a similar rating profile
Geometry Dash TrueGG 91.5% · Steam 93.0% 
Beat Saber TrueGG 91.7% · Steam 95.5% 
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt — Remastered TrueGG 90.6% · Steam 96.4% 
LIMBO TrueGG 88.7% · Steam 92.2% Image: Steam store (© respective owners)
Check another game
About this verdict
Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.
Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.
If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About