NEKOPARA Vol. 1
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played NEKOPARA Vol. 1 rate it? TrueGG Rating 92.4%

Release date: Dec 29, 2014 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it about the same as Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours.

Good for

  • Players who want fun from the first hours

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
92.4%
▼ −2.6 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 2+ hours (last 180 days) · 447 reviews

TrueGG, all time
96.1%
Steam overall
95.0%
Japanese, all time
97.3%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 23.1% of all reviews. Their positive share is 91.6%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (2h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 2 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h73%511–2 h95%562–5 h90%2015–10 h94%16210–20 h95%5620–50 h85%1350–100 h100%6100–200 h100%2200+ h100%7Positive share by playtime0–1 h5173%1–2 h5695%2–5 h20190%5–10 h16294%10–20 h5695%20–50 h1385%50–100 h6100%100–200 h2100%200+ h7100%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h72.5%0.0%51
1–2 h94.6%—56
2–5 h90.0%100.0%201
5–10 h94.4%—162
10–20 h94.6%100.0%56
20–50 h84.6%—13
50–100 h100.0%—6
100–200 h100.0%—2
200+ h100.0%—7

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 2+ hours. 7% had 20+ hours and 3% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

NEKOPARA Vol. 1 has a TrueGG Rating of 92.4%: the positive share among 447 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 2+ hours, close to Steam's overall 95.0%. Players who really play it broadly agree with the headline number (all time: 96.1%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 23% of the total, with 92% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

Negative reviews most often mention boredom and graphics and music. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 97.3%, similar to all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (95.2% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Boring / repetitive). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Boring / repetitive11% of negative reviews (2% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players
  • Graphics & music10% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel8% of positive reviews (5% of negative)
＋ ショコラ＋ シーン＋ 日本語＋ 設定＋ システム＋ パッチ＋ 実績＋ 最高− money− old− worst− wanted− gets− disgusting− sex− boring

Counted from 312 recent negative and 600 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating95.0%All time, all languages · 27,529 reviews
Adjusted rating95.2%Weighted by trust (95% range 95.0%–95.5%), +0.2pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews96.4%All time, Japanese-language reviews (+1.4pt vs overall) · 332 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review17%39%
Very short text44%26%
Key activated outside Steam21%23%
Received for free1%7%
Owns very few games10%4%
Over 100 reviews written6%10%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.720.69

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 4.4 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 500 1,000 1,500 2014-12: +289 / −4 2015-01: +799 / −26 2015-02: +221 / −13 2015-03: +202 / −10 2015-04: +129 / −3 2015-05: +164 / −7 2015-06: +298 / −13 2015-07: +149 / −5 2015-08: +345 / −17 2015-09: +102 / −6 2015-10: +169 / −12 2015-11: +178 / −8 2015-12: +392 / −11 2016-01: +312 / −11 2016-02: +527 / −22 2016-03: +191 / −14 2016-04: +210 / −12 2016-05: +224 / −9 2016-06: +223 / −15 2016-07: +250 / −14 2016-08: +122 / −4 2016-09: +125 / −3 2016-10: +94 / −2 2016-11: +1,238 / −22 2016-12: +216 / −14 2017-01: +243 / −13 2017-02: +189 / −16 2017-03: +132 / −6 2017-04: +249 / −14 2017-05: +197 / −8 2017-06: +300 / −19 2017-07: +318 / −11 2017-08: +195 / −12 2017-09: +171 / −12 2017-10: +144 / −1 2017-11: +808 / −14 2017-12: +247 / −13 2018-01: +198 / −8 2018-02: +140 / −4 2018-03: +115 / −2 2018-04: +78 / −6 2018-05: +149 / −9 2018-06: +173 / −9 2018-07: +198 / −15 2018-08: +123 / −6 2018-09: +71 / −3 2018-10: +73 / −3 2018-11: +380 / −8 2018-12: +115 / −10 2019-01: +102 / −5 2019-02: +127 / −11 2019-03: +76 / −2 2019-04: +73 / −5 2019-05: +109 / −3 2019-06: +254 / −2 2019-07: +293 / −7 2019-08: +85 / −2 2019-09: +68 / −2 2019-10: +76 / −1 2019-11: +192 / −3 2019-12: +194 / −7 2020-01: +276 / −11 2020-02: +235 / −4 2020-03: +343 / −9 2020-04: +188 / −7 2020-05: +305 / −20 2020-06: +276 / −11 2020-07: +462 / −19 2020-08: +193 / −11 2020-09: +147 / −4 2020-10: +155 / −4 2020-11: +390 / −14 2020-12: +397 / −22 2021-01: +422 / −15 2021-02: +416 / −18 2021-03: +249 / −11 2021-04: +296 / −16 2021-05: +299 / −21 2021-06: +254 / −18 2021-07: +336 / −17 2021-08: +193 / −10 2021-09: +126 / −9 2021-10: +114 / −5 2021-11: +268 / −13 2021-12: +201 / −8 2022-01: +224 / −15 2022-02: +226 / −14 2022-03: +139 / −5 2022-04: +116 / −9 2022-05: +168 / −11 2022-06: +125 / −9 2022-07: +173 / −10 2022-08: +113 / −3 2022-09: +129 / −5 2022-10: +92 / −4 2022-11: +166 / −7 2022-12: +130 / −7 2023-01: +130 / −13 2023-02: +95 / −7 2023-03: +89 / −6 2023-04: +60 / −4 2023-05: +92 / −5 2023-06: +55 / −5 2023-07: +120 / −6 2023-08: +93 / −4 2023-09: +74 / −3 2023-10: +85 / −3 2023-11: +92 / −8 2023-12: +67 / −5 2024-01: +73 / −3 2024-02: +76 / −3 2024-03: +87 / −8 2024-04: +48 / −6 2024-05: +91 / −4 2024-06: +80 / −1 2024-07: +111 / −8 2024-08: +80 / −5 2024-09: +35 / −11 2024-10: +53 / −7 2024-11: +55 / −4 2024-12: +96 / −9 2025-01: +80 / −7 2025-02: +59 / −3 2025-03: +73 / −3 2025-04: +63 / −11 2025-05: +55 / −4 2025-06: +83 / −12 2025-07: +71 / −8 2025-08: +47 / −0 2025-09: +76 / −6 2025-10: +57 / −5 2025-11: +54 / −6 2025-12: +65 / −4 2026-01: +78 / −8 2026-02: +75 / −5 2026-03: +77 / −2 2026-04: +48 / −4 2026-05: +59 / −5 2026-06: +55 / −5 2026-07: +102 / −6 2026-08: +56 / −12 2026-09: +74 / −8 2026-10: +51 / −6 2015/012016/012017/012018/012019/012020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 95.5% 2014-12: 98.6%2015-01: 96.8%2015-02: 94.4%2015-03: 95.3%2015-04: 97.7%2015-05: 95.9%2015-06: 95.8%2015-07: 96.8%2015-08: 95.3%2015-09: 94.4%2015-10: 93.4%2015-11: 95.7%2015-12: 97.3%2016-01: 96.6%2016-02: 96.0%2016-03: 93.2%2016-04: 94.6%2016-05: 96.1%2016-06: 93.7%2016-07: 94.7%2016-08: 96.8%2016-09: 97.7%2016-10: 97.9%2016-11: 98.3%2016-12: 93.9%2017-01: 94.9%2017-02: 92.2%2017-03: 95.7%2017-04: 94.7%2017-05: 96.1%2017-06: 94.0%2017-07: 96.7%2017-08: 94.2%2017-09: 93.4%2017-10: 99.3%2017-11: 98.3%2017-12: 95.0%2018-01: 96.1%2018-02: 97.2%2018-03: 98.3%2018-04: 92.9%2018-05: 94.3%2018-06: 95.1%2018-07: 93.0%2018-08: 95.3%2018-09: 95.9%2018-10: 96.1%2018-11: 97.9%2018-12: 92.0%2019-01: 95.3%2019-02: 92.0%2019-03: 97.4%2019-04: 93.6%2019-05: 97.3%2019-06: 99.2%2019-07: 97.7%2019-08: 97.7%2019-09: 97.1%2019-10: 98.7%2019-11: 98.5%2019-12: 96.5%2020-01: 96.2%2020-02: 98.3%2020-03: 97.4%2020-04: 96.4%2020-05: 93.8%2020-06: 96.2%2020-07: 96.0%2020-08: 94.6%2020-09: 97.4%2020-10: 97.5%2020-11: 96.5%2020-12: 94.7%2021-01: 96.6%2021-02: 95.9%2021-03: 95.8%2021-04: 94.9%2021-05: 93.4%2021-06: 93.4%2021-07: 95.2%2021-08: 95.1%2021-09: 93.3%2021-10: 95.8%2021-11: 95.4%2021-12: 96.2%2022-01: 93.7%2022-02: 94.2%2022-03: 96.5%2022-04: 92.8%2022-05: 93.9%2022-06: 93.3%2022-07: 94.5%2022-08: 97.4%2022-09: 96.3%2022-10: 95.8%2022-11: 96.0%2022-12: 94.9%2023-01: 90.9%2023-02: 93.1%2023-03: 93.7%2023-04: 93.8%2023-05: 94.8%2023-06: 91.7%2023-07: 95.2%2023-08: 95.9%2023-09: 96.1%2023-10: 96.6%2023-11: 92.0%2023-12: 93.1%2024-01: 96.1%2024-02: 96.2%2024-03: 91.6%2024-04: 88.9%2024-05: 95.8%2024-06: 98.8%2024-07: 93.3%2024-08: 94.1%2024-09: 76.1%2024-10: 88.3%2024-11: 93.2%2024-12: 91.4%2025-01: 92.0%2025-02: 95.2%2025-03: 96.1%2025-04: 85.1%2025-05: 93.2%2025-06: 87.4%2025-07: 89.9%2025-08: 100.0%2025-09: 92.7%2025-10: 91.9%2025-11: 90.0%2025-12: 94.2%2026-01: 90.7%2026-02: 93.8%2026-03: 97.5%2026-04: 92.3%2026-05: 92.2%2026-06: 91.7%2026-07: 94.4%2026-08: 82.4%2026-09: 90.2%2026-10: 89.5% 2015/012016/012017/012018/012019/012020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 2 4 6 2026-09-19: +4 / −0 2026-09-20: +6 / −0 2026-09-21: +1 / −1 2026-09-22: +3 / −0 2026-09-23: +0 / −0 2026-09-24: +3 / −0 2026-09-25: +0 / −0 2026-09-26: +6 / −0 2026-09-27: +2 / −1 2026-09-28: +2 / −0 2026-09-29: +1 / −0 2026-09-30: +1 / −0 2026-10-01: +3 / −0 2026-10-02: +5 / −0 2026-10-03: +4 / −0 2026-10-04: +3 / −0 2026-10-05: +4 / −1 2026-10-06: +5 / −0 2026-10-07: +1 / −0 2026-10-08: +1 / −0 2026-10-09: +2 / −1 2026-10-10: +1 / −0 2026-10-11: +3 / −0 2026-10-12: +3 / −1 2026-10-13: +2 / −0 2026-10-14: +2 / −0 2026-10-15: +3 / −0 2026-10-16: +3 / −1 2026-10-17: +3 / −1 2026-10-18: +3 / −1 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2014-12289498.6%
2015-017992696.8%
2015-022211394.4%
2015-032021095.3%
2015-04129397.7%
2015-05164795.9%
2015-062981395.8%
2015-07149596.8%
2015-083451795.3%
2015-09102694.4%
2015-101691293.4%
2015-11178895.7%
2015-123921197.3%
2016-013121196.6%
2016-025272296.0%
2016-031911493.2%
2016-042101294.6%
2016-05224996.1%
2016-062231593.7%
2016-072501494.7%
2016-08122496.8%
2016-09125397.7%
2016-1094297.9%
2016-111,2382298.3%
2016-122161493.9%
2017-012431394.9%
2017-021891692.2%
2017-03132695.7%
2017-042491494.7%
2017-05197896.1%
2017-063001994.0%
2017-073181196.7%
2017-081951294.2%
2017-091711293.4%
2017-10144199.3%
2017-118081498.3%
2017-122471395.0%
2018-01198896.1%
2018-02140497.2%
2018-03115298.3%
2018-0478692.9%
2018-05149994.3%
2018-06173995.1%
2018-071981593.0%
2018-08123695.3%
2018-0971395.9%
2018-1073396.1%
2018-11380897.9%
2018-121151092.0%
2019-01102595.3%
2019-021271192.0%
2019-0376297.4%
2019-0473593.6%
2019-05109397.3%
2019-06254299.2%
2019-07293797.7%
2019-0885297.7%
2019-0968297.1%
2019-1076198.7%
2019-11192398.5%
2019-12194796.5%
2020-012761196.2%
2020-02235498.3%
2020-03343997.4%
2020-04188796.4%
2020-053052093.8%
2020-062761196.2%
2020-074621996.0%
2020-081931194.6%
2020-09147497.4%
2020-10155497.5%
2020-113901496.5%
2020-123972294.7%
2021-014221596.6%
2021-024161895.9%
2021-032491195.8%
2021-042961694.9%
2021-052992193.4%
2021-062541893.4%
2021-073361795.2%
2021-081931095.1%
2021-09126993.3%
2021-10114595.8%
2021-112681395.4%
2021-12201896.2%
2022-012241593.7%
2022-022261494.2%
2022-03139596.5%
2022-04116992.8%
2022-051681193.9%
2022-06125993.3%
2022-071731094.5%
2022-08113397.4%
2022-09129596.3%
2022-1092495.8%
2022-11166796.0%
2022-12130794.9%
2023-011301390.9%
2023-0295793.1%
2023-0389693.7%
2023-0460493.8%
2023-0592594.8%
2023-0655591.7%
2023-07120695.2%
2023-0893495.9%
2023-0974396.1%
2023-1085396.6%
2023-1192892.0%
2023-1267593.1%
2024-0173396.1%
2024-0276396.2%
2024-0387891.6%
2024-0448688.9%
2024-0591495.8%
2024-0680198.8%
2024-07111893.3%
2024-0880594.1%
2024-09351176.1%
2024-1053788.3%
2024-1155493.2%
2024-1296991.4%
2025-0180792.0%
2025-0259395.2%
2025-0373396.1%
2025-04631185.1%
2025-0555493.2%
2025-06831287.4%
2025-0771889.9%
2025-08470100.0%
2025-0976692.7%
2025-1057591.9%
2025-1154690.0%
2025-1265494.2%
2026-0178890.7%
2026-0275593.8%
2026-0377297.5%
2026-0448492.3%
2026-0559592.2%
2026-0655591.7%
2026-07102694.4%
2026-08561282.4%
2026-0974890.2%
2026-1051689.5%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1940
2026-09-2060
2026-09-2111
2026-09-2230
2026-09-2300
2026-09-2430
2026-09-2500
2026-09-2660
2026-09-2721
2026-09-2820
2026-09-2910
2026-09-3010
2026-10-0130
2026-10-0250
2026-10-0340
2026-10-0430
2026-10-0541
2026-10-0650
2026-10-0710
2026-10-0810
2026-10-0921
2026-10-1010
2026-10-1130
2026-10-1231
2026-10-1320
2026-10-1420
2026-10-1530
2026-10-1631
2026-10-1731
2026-10-1831
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days91.6%107
Last 180 days90.6%545
All time95.0%27,529
Japanese, last 180 days75.0%4
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About

Read the methodology and its limits Read reviews on Steam ↗