Clicker Heroes
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played Clicker Heroes rate it? TrueGG Rating 84.3%

Release date: May 13, 2015 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it lower than Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours.

Good for

  • Players who want fun from the first hours

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
84.3%
▼ −5.3 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 324 reviews

TrueGG, all time
90.7%
Steam overall
89.6%
Japanese, all time
91.5%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 11.3% of all reviews. Their positive share is 81.2%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h77%521–2 h76%212–5 h90%595–10 h89%5710–20 h91%7420–50 h83%7550–100 h84%68100–200 h79%43200+ h87%138Positive share by playtime0–1 h5277%1–2 h2176%2–5 h5990%5–10 h5789%10–20 h7491%20–50 h7583%50–100 h6884%100–200 h4379%200+ h13887%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h76.9%—52
1–2 h76.2%—21
2–5 h89.8%100.0%59
5–10 h89.5%—57
10–20 h90.5%—74
20–50 h82.7%—75
50–100 h83.8%—68
100–200 h79.1%100.0%43
200+ h87.0%0.0%138

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 53% had 20+ hours and 28% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

Clicker Heroes has a TrueGG Rating of 84.3%: the positive share among 324 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours. That is 5.3 points below Steam's overall 89.6%, so players who really play the current version are harsher than the headline number suggests (all time: 90.7%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 11% of the total, with 81% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

Negative reviews most often mention boredom. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 91.5%, 7.2 points above all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (89.4% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on the game's design (Boring / repetitive). These rarely change with updates, so the rating likely reflects the game itself. Judge by whether it suits you.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Boring / repetitive10% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel25% of positive reviews (16% of negative)
+ 課金+ 要素+ マウス+ 強化+ enjoy+ ステージ+ 無料+ クリック− sucks− waste− boring− rubies− people− instead− next− life

Counted from 327 recent negative and 584 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating89.6%All time, all languages · 62,175 reviews
Adjusted rating89.4%Weighted by trust (95% range 89.0%–89.9%), −0.2pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews91.3%All time, Japanese-language reviews (+1.7pt vs overall) · 310 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review10%18%
Very short text41%30%
Key activated outside Steam0%0%
Received for free0%0%
Owns very few games11%6%
Over 100 reviews written9%17%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.760.77

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 41.6 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 2015-05: +4,552 / −357 2015-06: +4,137 / −386 2015-07: +2,139 / −243 2015-08: +1,518 / −180 2015-09: +1,161 / −125 2015-10: +1,057 / −124 2015-11: +1,139 / −135 2015-12: +1,526 / −129 2016-01: +1,341 / −206 2016-02: +1,093 / −153 2016-03: +892 / −110 2016-04: +737 / −91 2016-05: +691 / −86 2016-06: +1,412 / −166 2016-07: +1,014 / −106 2016-08: +762 / −95 2016-09: +603 / −63 2016-10: +683 / −82 2016-11: +2,004 / −107 2016-12: +876 / −95 2017-01: +642 / −66 2017-02: +562 / −64 2017-03: +534 / −65 2017-04: +530 / −71 2017-05: +478 / −50 2017-06: +622 / −74 2017-07: +585 / −68 2017-08: +400 / −49 2017-09: +369 / −55 2017-10: +422 / −54 2017-11: +1,154 / −92 2017-12: +680 / −111 2018-01: +416 / −56 2018-02: +293 / −50 2018-03: +267 / −49 2018-04: +232 / −47 2018-05: +354 / −44 2018-06: +257 / −38 2018-07: +288 / −49 2018-08: +204 / −41 2018-09: +141 / −30 2018-10: +131 / −17 2018-11: +432 / −48 2018-12: +182 / −29 2019-01: +174 / −21 2019-02: +139 / −27 2019-03: +136 / −15 2019-04: +144 / −14 2019-05: +210 / −16 2019-06: +951 / −86 2019-07: +849 / −75 2019-08: +95 / −17 2019-09: +89 / −19 2019-10: +158 / −24 2019-11: +526 / −48 2019-12: +431 / −58 2020-01: +348 / −35 2020-02: +317 / −38 2020-03: +387 / −60 2020-04: +386 / −44 2020-05: +450 / −56 2020-06: +383 / −42 2020-07: +338 / −50 2020-08: +270 / −42 2020-09: +265 / −37 2020-10: +271 / −32 2020-11: +342 / −48 2020-12: +360 / −55 2021-01: +396 / −47 2021-02: +344 / −43 2021-03: +366 / −37 2021-04: +327 / −29 2021-05: +342 / −43 2021-06: +316 / −34 2021-07: +307 / −36 2021-08: +312 / −27 2021-09: +323 / −29 2021-10: +246 / −42 2021-11: +319 / −35 2021-12: +309 / −34 2022-01: +284 / −46 2022-02: +256 / −32 2022-03: +240 / −35 2022-04: +207 / −37 2022-05: +229 / −34 2022-06: +231 / −40 2022-07: +217 / −34 2022-08: +198 / −28 2022-09: +160 / −28 2022-10: +162 / −20 2022-11: +233 / −24 2022-12: +174 / −32 2023-01: +182 / −26 2023-02: +149 / −28 2023-03: +171 / −32 2023-04: +167 / −30 2023-05: +183 / −29 2023-06: +181 / −35 2023-07: +184 / −19 2023-08: +149 / −22 2023-09: +128 / −18 2023-10: +208 / −30 2023-11: +268 / −28 2023-12: +199 / −43 2024-01: +195 / −34 2024-02: +130 / −30 2024-03: +166 / −38 2024-04: +156 / −24 2024-05: +168 / −31 2024-06: +169 / −25 2024-07: +182 / −25 2024-08: +126 / −25 2024-09: +132 / −19 2024-10: +129 / −16 2024-11: +140 / −24 2024-12: +171 / −33 2025-01: +326 / −25 2025-02: +133 / −15 2025-03: +144 / −18 2025-04: +131 / −22 2025-05: +119 / −25 2025-06: +129 / −30 2025-07: +121 / −21 2025-08: +118 / −19 2025-09: +104 / −16 2025-10: +129 / −20 2025-11: +129 / −21 2025-12: +111 / −24 2026-01: +126 / −15 2026-02: +97 / −21 2026-03: +102 / −25 2026-04: +99 / −14 2026-05: +86 / −19 2026-06: +90 / −16 2026-07: +99 / −16 2026-08: +79 / −17 2026-09: +78 / −13 2026-10: +46 / −9 2015/052016/012017/012018/012019/012020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 89.4% 2026-06: update 2015-05: 92.7%2015-06: 91.5%2015-07: 89.8%2015-08: 89.4%2015-09: 90.3%2015-10: 89.5%2015-11: 89.4%2015-12: 92.2%2016-01: 86.7%2016-02: 87.7%2016-03: 89.0%2016-04: 89.0%2016-05: 88.9%2016-06: 89.5%2016-07: 90.5%2016-08: 88.9%2016-09: 90.5%2016-10: 89.3%2016-11: 94.9%2016-12: 90.2%2017-01: 90.7%2017-02: 89.8%2017-03: 89.1%2017-04: 88.2%2017-05: 90.5%2017-06: 89.4%2017-07: 89.6%2017-08: 89.1%2017-09: 87.0%2017-10: 88.7%2017-11: 92.6%2017-12: 86.0%2018-01: 88.1%2018-02: 85.4%2018-03: 84.5%2018-04: 83.2%2018-05: 88.9%2018-06: 87.1%2018-07: 85.5%2018-08: 83.3%2018-09: 82.5%2018-10: 88.5%2018-11: 90.0%2018-12: 86.3%2019-01: 89.2%2019-02: 83.7%2019-03: 90.1%2019-04: 91.1%2019-05: 92.9%2019-06: 91.7%2019-07: 91.9%2019-08: 84.8%2019-09: 82.4%2019-10: 86.8%2019-11: 91.6%2019-12: 88.1%2020-01: 90.9%2020-02: 89.3%2020-03: 86.6%2020-04: 89.8%2020-05: 88.9%2020-06: 90.1%2020-07: 87.1%2020-08: 86.5%2020-09: 87.7%2020-10: 89.4%2020-11: 87.7%2020-12: 86.7%2021-01: 89.4%2021-02: 88.9%2021-03: 90.8%2021-04: 91.9%2021-05: 88.8%2021-06: 90.3%2021-07: 89.5%2021-08: 92.0%2021-09: 91.8%2021-10: 85.4%2021-11: 90.1%2021-12: 90.1%2022-01: 86.1%2022-02: 88.9%2022-03: 87.3%2022-04: 84.8%2022-05: 87.1%2022-06: 85.2%2022-07: 86.5%2022-08: 87.6%2022-09: 85.1%2022-10: 89.0%2022-11: 90.7%2022-12: 84.5%2023-01: 87.5%2023-02: 84.2%2023-03: 84.2%2023-04: 84.8%2023-05: 86.3%2023-06: 83.8%2023-07: 90.6%2023-08: 87.1%2023-09: 87.7%2023-10: 87.4%2023-11: 90.5%2023-12: 82.2%2024-01: 85.2%2024-02: 81.3%2024-03: 81.4%2024-04: 86.7%2024-05: 84.4%2024-06: 87.1%2024-07: 87.9%2024-08: 83.4%2024-09: 87.4%2024-10: 89.0%2024-11: 85.4%2024-12: 83.8%2025-01: 92.9%2025-02: 89.9%2025-03: 88.9%2025-04: 85.6%2025-05: 82.6%2025-06: 81.1%2025-07: 85.2%2025-08: 86.1%2025-09: 86.7%2025-10: 86.6%2025-11: 86.0%2025-12: 82.2%2026-01: 89.4%2026-02: 82.2%2026-03: 80.3%2026-04: 87.6%2026-05: 81.9%2026-06: 84.9%2026-07: 86.1%2026-08: 82.3%2026-09: 85.7%2026-10: 83.6% 2015/052016/012017/012018/012019/012020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Updates and ratings before and after

DateAnnouncement2 months before → after
2026-06-22 Clicker Heroes Major Update: Full Gamepad Support Is Here! 85% → 84% (−0.5pt)

Picked automatically from the titles of Steam announcements by the developer (one per month, last 3 years, up to 10). The dotted lines mark those months. Before and after are the positive rates of the two months before and after (excluding the month itself); shown as "—" under 50 reviews or when the two months after are not complete. An update is not necessarily the cause of a change.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 5 10 2026-09-19: +0 / −1 2026-09-20: +3 / −2 2026-09-21: +5 / −0 2026-09-22: +3 / −1 2026-09-23: +1 / −0 2026-09-24: +3 / −0 2026-09-25: +3 / −0 2026-09-26: +4 / −2 2026-09-27: +0 / −1 2026-09-28: +3 / −0 2026-09-29: +4 / −0 2026-09-30: +2 / −0 2026-10-01: +2 / −1 2026-10-02: +3 / −0 2026-10-03: +6 / −1 2026-10-04: +4 / −0 2026-10-05: +1 / −0 2026-10-06: +1 / −0 2026-10-07: +1 / −1 2026-10-08: +3 / −3 2026-10-09: +0 / −0 2026-10-10: +3 / −0 2026-10-11: +3 / −0 2026-10-12: +2 / −0 2026-10-13: +2 / −0 2026-10-14: +2 / −0 2026-10-15: +1 / −0 2026-10-16: +7 / −2 2026-10-17: +2 / −0 2026-10-18: +3 / −1 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2015-054,55235792.7%
2015-064,13738691.5%
2015-072,13924389.8%
2015-081,51818089.4%
2015-091,16112590.3%
2015-101,05712489.5%
2015-111,13913589.4%
2015-121,52612992.2%
2016-011,34120686.7%
2016-021,09315387.7%
2016-0389211089.0%
2016-047379189.0%
2016-056918688.9%
2016-061,41216689.5%
2016-071,01410690.5%
2016-087629588.9%
2016-096036390.5%
2016-106838289.3%
2016-112,00410794.9%
2016-128769590.2%
2017-016426690.7%
2017-025626489.8%
2017-035346589.1%
2017-045307188.2%
2017-054785090.5%
2017-066227489.4%
2017-075856889.6%
2017-084004989.1%
2017-093695587.0%
2017-104225488.7%
2017-111,1549292.6%
2017-1268011186.0%
2018-014165688.1%
2018-022935085.4%
2018-032674984.5%
2018-042324783.2%
2018-053544488.9%
2018-062573887.1%
2018-072884985.5%
2018-082044183.3%
2018-091413082.5%
2018-101311788.5%
2018-114324890.0%
2018-121822986.3%
2019-011742189.2%
2019-021392783.7%
2019-031361590.1%
2019-041441491.1%
2019-052101692.9%
2019-069518691.7%
2019-078497591.9%
2019-08951784.8%
2019-09891982.4%
2019-101582486.8%
2019-115264891.6%
2019-124315888.1%
2020-013483590.9%
2020-023173889.3%
2020-033876086.6%
2020-043864489.8%
2020-054505688.9%
2020-063834290.1%
2020-073385087.1%
2020-082704286.5%
2020-092653787.7%
2020-102713289.4%
2020-113424887.7%
2020-123605586.7%
2021-013964789.4%
2021-023444388.9%
2021-033663790.8%
2021-043272991.9%
2021-053424388.8%
2021-063163490.3%
2021-073073689.5%
2021-083122792.0%
2021-093232991.8%
2021-102464285.4%
2021-113193590.1%
2021-123093490.1%
2022-012844686.1%
2022-022563288.9%
2022-032403587.3%
2022-042073784.8%
2022-052293487.1%
2022-062314085.2%
2022-072173486.5%
2022-081982887.6%
2022-091602885.1%
2022-101622089.0%
2022-112332490.7%
2022-121743284.5%
2023-011822687.5%
2023-021492884.2%
2023-031713284.2%
2023-041673084.8%
2023-051832986.3%
2023-061813583.8%
2023-071841990.6%
2023-081492287.1%
2023-091281887.7%
2023-102083087.4%
2023-112682890.5%
2023-121994382.2%
2024-011953485.2%
2024-021303081.3%
2024-031663881.4%
2024-041562486.7%
2024-051683184.4%
2024-061692587.1%
2024-071822587.9%
2024-081262583.4%
2024-091321987.4%
2024-101291689.0%
2024-111402485.4%
2024-121713383.8%
2025-013262592.9%
2025-021331589.9%
2025-031441888.9%
2025-041312285.6%
2025-051192582.6%
2025-061293081.1%
2025-071212185.2%
2025-081181986.1%
2025-091041686.7%
2025-101292086.6%
2025-111292186.0%
2025-121112482.2%
2026-011261589.4%
2026-02972182.2%
2026-031022580.3%
2026-04991487.6%
2026-05861981.9%
2026-06901684.9%
2026-07991686.1%
2026-08791782.3%
2026-09781385.7%
2026-1046983.6%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1901
2026-09-2032
2026-09-2150
2026-09-2231
2026-09-2310
2026-09-2430
2026-09-2530
2026-09-2642
2026-09-2701
2026-09-2830
2026-09-2940
2026-09-3020
2026-10-0121
2026-10-0230
2026-10-0361
2026-10-0440
2026-10-0510
2026-10-0610
2026-10-0711
2026-10-0833
2026-10-0900
2026-10-1030
2026-10-1130
2026-10-1220
2026-10-1320
2026-10-1420
2026-10-1510
2026-10-1672
2026-10-1720
2026-10-1831
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days83.5%91
Last 180 days85.2%587
All time89.6%62,175
Japanese, last 180 days66.7%3
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About