EA SPORTS FIFA 23
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played EA SPORTS FIFA 23 rate it? TrueGG Rating 72.9%

Release date: Sep 30, 2022 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it higher than Steam overall. Early impressions are weaker, so the first few hours tend to decide whether it clicks. Recent reviews are recovering.

Good for

  • Players willing to push through a slow start

Think twice if you are

  • Players who judge a game in the first hours (early ratings are lower)
  • Players bothered by bugs (reports of crashes and bugs)
  • Players relying on Japanese (Japanese reviews rate it lower)

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
72.9%
▲ +15.9 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 358 reviews

TrueGG, all time
60.6%
Steam overall
57.0%
Japanese, all time
31.5%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 10.5% of all reviews. Their positive share is 22.3%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h83%61–2 h67%32–5 h69%135–10 h60%1010–20 h72%2920–50 h68%5650–100 h77%71100–200 h70%84200+ h74%147Positive share by playtime0–1 h683%1–2 h367%2–5 h1369%5–10 h1060%10–20 h2972%20–50 h5668%50–100 h7177%100–200 h8470%200+ h14774%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h83.3%—6
1–2 h66.7%—3
2–5 h69.2%—13
5–10 h60.0%—10
10–20 h72.4%—29
20–50 h67.9%—56
50–100 h77.5%50.0%71
100–200 h70.2%—84
200+ h74.1%100.0%147

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 57% had 20+ hours and 24% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

EA SPORTS FIFA 23 has a TrueGG Rating of 72.9%: the positive share among 358 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours. That is 15.9 points above Steam's overall 57.0%, so players who really play the current version rate it higher than the headline number suggests (all time: 60.6%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 10% of the total, and only 22% of them are positive. Some players bounce off early, but those who get past the opening rate it higher. Steam accepts refund requests within 2 hours of play and 14 days of purchase.

Negative reviews most often mention crashes and bugs and updates and the developers. Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 31.5%, 41.4 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals gives 53.6% (-3.4 points vs Steam overall); keep this in mind when reading the headline number.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on technical quality (Crashes & bugs). These can be fixed, so check recent reviews too. It is also a game many people bounce off early (early reviews are much less positive than those of players who stuck with it).

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Crashes & bugs15% of negative reviews (4% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · ongoing since launch
  • Updates & developers7% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among under 2h players · ongoing since launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel12% of positive reviews (8% of negative)
+ nice+ best+ cup+ great+ friends+ series+ last+ 環境− 以前− 返金− year− ストレス− 無駄− フリーズ− trash− アンチチート

Counted from 570 recent negative and 414 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating57.0%All time, all languages · 150,152 reviews
Adjusted rating53.6%Weighted by trust (95% range 52.5%–54.6%), −3.4pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews29.7%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−27.3pt vs overall) · 384 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review2%2%
Very short text61%36%
Key activated outside Steam9%10%
Received for free3%2%
Owns very few games19%17%
Over 100 reviews written2%1%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.690.79

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 138.8 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative▨ Negative spike
0 5,000 10k 15k 20k 2022-09: +840 / −1,818 2022-10: +6,745 / −9,170 2022-11: +5,717 / −4,218 2022-12: +9,058 / −8,415 2023-01: +8,709 / −8,317 2023-02: +4,282 / −4,170 2023-03: +3,674 / −3,132 2023-04: +5,539 / −3,989 2023-05: +4,363 / −3,063 2023-06: +3,819 / −2,396 2023-07: +5,443 / −2,870 2023-08: +3,891 / −2,116 2023-09: +2,191 / −1,000 2023-10: +1,398 / −603 2023-11: +1,418 / −397 2023-12: +892 / −359 2024-01: +649 / −283 2024-02: +470 / −227 2024-03: +506 / −214 2024-04: +458 / −165 2024-05: +376 / −164 2024-06: +436 / −209 2024-07: +399 / −185 2024-08: +236 / −100 2024-09: +200 / −106 2024-10: +184 / −97 2024-11: +173 / −68 2024-12: +170 / −87 2025-01: +156 / −76 2025-02: +110 / −61 2025-03: +96 / −47 2025-04: +95 / −33 2025-05: +95 / −44 2025-06: +108 / −30 2025-07: +92 / −40 2025-08: +74 / −27 2025-09: +69 / −22 2025-10: +84 / −28 2025-11: +65 / −21 2025-12: +70 / −56 2026-01: +74 / −47 2026-02: +49 / −33 2026-03: +49 / −25 2026-04: +54 / −30 2026-05: +48 / −19 2026-06: +57 / −22 2026-07: +57 / −29 2026-08: +42 / −15 2026-09: +45 / −9 2026-10: +16 / −6 2022/092023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 55.7% 2022-09: 31.6%2022-10: 42.4%2022-11: 57.5%2022-12: 51.8%2023-01: 51.2%2023-02: 50.7%2023-03: 54.0%2023-04: 58.1%2023-05: 58.8%2023-06: 61.4%2023-07: 65.5%2023-08: 64.8%2023-09: 68.7%2023-10: 69.9%2023-11: 78.1%2023-12: 71.3%2024-01: 69.6%2024-02: 67.4%2024-03: 70.3%2024-04: 73.5%2024-05: 69.6%2024-06: 67.6%2024-07: 68.3%2024-08: 70.2%2024-09: 65.4%2024-10: 65.5%2024-11: 71.8%2024-12: 66.1%2025-01: 67.2%2025-02: 64.3%2025-03: 67.1%2025-04: 74.2%2025-05: 68.3%2025-06: 78.3%2025-07: 69.7%2025-08: 73.3%2025-09: 75.8%2025-10: 75.0%2025-11: 75.6%2025-12: 55.6%2026-01: 61.2%2026-02: 59.8%2026-03: 66.2%2026-04: 64.3%2026-05: 71.6%2026-06: 72.2%2026-07: 66.3%2026-08: 73.7%2026-09: 83.3% 2022/092023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.Shaded months were detected as concentrated waves of negative reviews (2022-09).Detection rule

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 1 2 3 2026-09-19: +0 / −0 2026-09-20: +2 / −0 2026-09-21: +3 / −0 2026-09-22: +2 / −0 2026-09-23: +0 / −0 2026-09-24: +1 / −1 2026-09-25: +3 / −0 2026-09-26: +3 / −0 2026-09-27: +1 / −1 2026-09-28: +0 / −1 2026-09-29: +1 / −0 2026-09-30: +0 / −0 2026-10-01: +1 / −1 2026-10-02: +1 / −0 2026-10-03: +0 / −1 2026-10-04: +1 / −0 2026-10-05: +1 / −0 2026-10-06: +1 / −0 2026-10-07: +2 / −1 2026-10-08: +0 / −0 2026-10-09: +0 / −0 2026-10-10: +1 / −1 2026-10-11: +0 / −0 2026-10-12: +1 / −0 2026-10-13: +1 / −0 2026-10-14: +1 / −0 2026-10-15: +0 / −0 2026-10-16: +1 / −1 2026-10-17: +2 / −0 2026-10-18: +2 / −1 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2022-098401,81831.6%
2022-106,7459,17042.4%
2022-115,7174,21857.5%
2022-129,0588,41551.8%
2023-018,7098,31751.2%
2023-024,2824,17050.7%
2023-033,6743,13254.0%
2023-045,5393,98958.1%
2023-054,3633,06358.8%
2023-063,8192,39661.4%
2023-075,4432,87065.5%
2023-083,8912,11664.8%
2023-092,1911,00068.7%
2023-101,39860369.9%
2023-111,41839778.1%
2023-1289235971.3%
2024-0164928369.6%
2024-0247022767.4%
2024-0350621470.3%
2024-0445816573.5%
2024-0537616469.6%
2024-0643620967.6%
2024-0739918568.3%
2024-0823610070.2%
2024-0920010665.4%
2024-101849765.5%
2024-111736871.8%
2024-121708766.1%
2025-011567667.2%
2025-021106164.3%
2025-03964767.1%
2025-04953374.2%
2025-05954468.3%
2025-061083078.3%
2025-07924069.7%
2025-08742773.3%
2025-09692275.8%
2025-10842875.0%
2025-11652175.6%
2025-12705655.6%
2026-01744761.2%
2026-02493359.8%
2026-03492566.2%
2026-04543064.3%
2026-05481971.6%
2026-06572272.2%
2026-07572966.3%
2026-08421573.7%
2026-0945983.3%
2026-1016672.7%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-1900
2026-09-2020
2026-09-2130
2026-09-2220
2026-09-2300
2026-09-2411
2026-09-2530
2026-09-2630
2026-09-2711
2026-09-2801
2026-09-2910
2026-09-3000
2026-10-0111
2026-10-0210
2026-10-0301
2026-10-0410
2026-10-0510
2026-10-0610
2026-10-0721
2026-10-0800
2026-10-0900
2026-10-1011
2026-10-1100
2026-10-1210
2026-10-1310
2026-10-1410
2026-10-1500
2026-10-1611
2026-10-1720
2026-10-1821
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days80.4%46
Last 180 days72.6%419
All time57.0%150,152
Japanese, last 180 days66.7%3
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About