World of Tanks Blitz
Image: Steam store (© respective owners)

How do players who really played World of Tanks Blitz rate it? TrueGG Rating 60.8%

Release date: Nov 9, 2016 Data as of 2026-10-19 View on Steam ↗

Players who really played rate it lower than Steam overall. Ratings tend to be steady from the first hours. Recent reviews are falling.

Good for

  • Players looking for hundreds of hours

Think twice if you are

  • Players wary of microtransactions and DLC
  • Players buying on the promise of future updates (complaints about the developers)
  • Players who care about game balance

A rule-based guide from review patterns (no AI). How

TrueGG RatingMethodology ↗
60.8%
▼ −17.0 pt
vs Steam overall

Positive among players with 20+ hours (last 180 days) · 1,892 reviews

TrueGG, all time
75.8%
Steam overall
77.8%
Japanese, all time
54.9%

Early wall

Reviews written under 2 hours: 6.7% of all reviews. Their positive share is 64.0%.

This is not a drop-off rate; it describes who wrote reviews. Refund guide: within 14 days of purchase and under 2 hours of play (Steam refund policy).

01 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Does the rating change the longer people play?

Used for TrueGG Rating (20h+)JapaneseRight: reviews
Positive share by playtimeRanges from 20 hours up are highlighted. Exact values are in the table below.0%25%50%75%100%0–1 h72%1411–2 h50%482–5 h76%2685–10 h78%27210–20 h75%30720–50 h70%39650–100 h69%283100–200 h60%309200+ h55%904Positive share by playtime0–1 h14172%1–2 h4850%2–5 h26876%5–10 h27278%10–20 h30775%20–50 h39670%50–100 h28369%100–200 h30960%200+ h90455%

Positive share by playtime at the time of review (reviews from the last 180 days). Ranges under 50 reviews are pale and dashed (indicative only); “—” means no reviews.

Show chart values as a table
PlaytimePositiveJapaneseReviews
0–1 h72.3%100.0%141
1–2 h50.0%—48
2–5 h76.1%0.0%268
5–10 h77.9%66.7%272
10–20 h74.6%—307
20–50 h69.9%—396
50–100 h68.9%0.0%283
100–200 h59.9%0.0%309
200+ h54.5%42.9%904

How long people play: half of reviewers had played 20+ hours. 63% had 20+ hours and 38% had 100+ hours (all time).

02 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Summary

World of Tanks Blitz has a TrueGG Rating of 60.8%: the positive share among 1,892 reviews written in the last 180 days by players with 20+ hours. That is 17.0 points below Steam's overall 77.8%, so players who really play the current version are harsher than the headline number suggests (all time: 75.8%).

Reviews written under 2 hours make up 7% of the total, with 64% positive. The early hours do not split opinion much.

In the last 180 days, approval peaks at 78% around 5–10h and falls to 55% at 200h+: in the current version, long-time players are harsher.

Negative reviews most often mention monetization and DLC (more than at launch), updates and the developers (more than at launch), and バランス (more than at launch). Positive reviews praise how fun it feels.

Among Japanese-language reviews, the TrueGG Rating is 54.9%, 5.9 points below all languages.

Re-weighting reviews by trust signals (playtime, length, how the game was obtained) barely changes the rating (76.0% adjusted), so Steam's number is not noticeably distorted by key giveaways or throwaway reviews.

All figures come from Steam's public review counts, and topics are counted with our published dictionary (no AI). Data as of 2026-10-19.

03 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Why it is rated this way

What drives the rating

Complaints center on live operations and online play (Monetization & DLC, Updates & developers, Balance, Player base & matchmaking). These shift over time, so weigh recent reviews more than the all-time figure.

− Most mentioned complaints

  • Monetization & DLC16% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 2–20h players · more than at launch
  • Updates & developers14% of negative reviews (6% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch
  • Balance11% of negative reviews (3% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch
  • Player base & matchmaking10% of negative reviews (5% of positive) · most common among 100h+ players · more than at launch

+ What players praise

  • Fun & feel25% of positive reviews (16% of negative)
＋ nice＋ great＋ fast＋ best＋ cool＋ オススメ＋ 操作＋ keep− another− matter− fix− damage− making− enemy− single− can't

Counted from 482 recent negative and 537 positive reviews in Japanese and English, using our published topic dictionary. No AI is used. Topics overlap, so shares do not add up to 100%. Sarcasm and nuance are not detected, and this does not show cause and effect.How we count

04 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Checking the numbers

Figures with a different scope, shown alongside the TrueGG Rating.

MetricPositiveScope
Official Steam rating77.8%All time, all languages · 153,625 reviews
Adjusted rating76.0%Weighted by trust (95% range 75.3%–76.7%), −1.8pt vs official
Japanese-language reviews56.6%All time, Japanese-language reviews (−21.3pt vs overall) · 419 reviews
Show the positive vs negative breakdown

Share of sampled reviews that meet each condition that lowers trust. When a condition is more common on the positive side, the adjusted rating falls below the official one.

ConditionPositive reviewsNegative reviews
Under 2 hours played at review5%5%
Very short text53%33%
Key activated outside Steam0%0%
Received for free0%0%
Owns very few games29%28%
Over 100 reviews written2%1%
Average trust (1.0 = full)0.700.78

The median total playtime of the sampled reviewers is 109.6 hours. 400 positive and 400 negative reviews analyzed · data as of 2026-10-19

05 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

When did the rating change?

Monthly positive and negative review counts since release, as published by Steam.

Reviews per month

■ Positive■ Negative
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 2016-11: +1,670 / −732 2016-12: +562 / −203 2017-01: +487 / −174 2017-02: +363 / −131 2017-03: +308 / −106 2017-04: +261 / −97 2017-05: +253 / −198 2017-06: +309 / −155 2017-07: +369 / −137 2017-08: +321 / −129 2017-09: +321 / −124 2017-10: +345 / −163 2017-11: +739 / −195 2017-12: +430 / −122 2018-01: +455 / −151 2018-02: +335 / −146 2018-03: +344 / −178 2018-04: +300 / −241 2018-05: +353 / −213 2018-06: +306 / −189 2018-07: +285 / −135 2018-08: +252 / −128 2018-09: +278 / −107 2018-10: +333 / −145 2018-11: +1,009 / −266 2018-12: +400 / −195 2019-01: +422 / −198 2019-02: +385 / −167 2019-03: +333 / −154 2019-04: +358 / −123 2019-05: +339 / −172 2019-06: +1,069 / −282 2019-07: +1,198 / −259 2019-08: +323 / −137 2019-09: +449 / −151 2019-10: +879 / −189 2019-11: +3,494 / −503 2019-12: +2,434 / −476 2020-01: +2,101 / −476 2020-02: +2,831 / −499 2020-03: +1,981 / −379 2020-04: +2,260 / −489 2020-05: +2,016 / −464 2020-06: +2,818 / −516 2020-07: +1,692 / −358 2020-08: +1,510 / −363 2020-09: +1,547 / −356 2020-10: +1,697 / −367 2020-11: +2,630 / −471 2020-12: +2,884 / −596 2021-01: +2,668 / −517 2021-02: +2,510 / −492 2021-03: +2,623 / −467 2021-04: +2,728 / −524 2021-05: +2,496 / −621 2021-06: +2,484 / −641 2021-07: +2,335 / −596 2021-08: +2,543 / −616 2021-09: +2,514 / −535 2021-10: +2,358 / −578 2021-11: +3,392 / −625 2021-12: +2,869 / −704 2022-01: +2,865 / −689 2022-02: +2,492 / −589 2022-03: +2,220 / −493 2022-04: +2,032 / −457 2022-05: +1,855 / −483 2022-06: +2,153 / −579 2022-07: +1,793 / −557 2022-08: +1,987 / −607 2022-09: +1,949 / −499 2022-10: +1,360 / −419 2022-11: +1,062 / −234 2022-12: +1,063 / −271 2023-01: +1,176 / −274 2023-02: +1,115 / −293 2023-03: +982 / −284 2023-04: +835 / −238 2023-05: +864 / −246 2023-06: +884 / −286 2023-07: +962 / −292 2023-08: +848 / −291 2023-09: +784 / −250 2023-10: +864 / −304 2023-11: +1,209 / −269 2023-12: +1,253 / −383 2024-01: +1,137 / −373 2024-02: +868 / −302 2024-03: +868 / −455 2024-04: +622 / −304 2024-05: +706 / −274 2024-06: +738 / −262 2024-07: +816 / −322 2024-08: +855 / −343 2024-09: +649 / −249 2024-10: +593 / −238 2024-11: +929 / −243 2024-12: +996 / −351 2025-01: +989 / −1,122 2025-02: +584 / −278 2025-03: +533 / −245 2025-04: +440 / −198 2025-05: +441 / −221 2025-06: +485 / −252 2025-07: +443 / −238 2025-08: +425 / −225 2025-09: +402 / −185 2025-10: +410 / −194 2025-11: +807 / −227 2025-12: +568 / −202 2026-01: +602 / −285 2026-02: +429 / −200 2026-03: +323 / −181 2026-04: +325 / −155 2026-05: +352 / −183 2026-06: +367 / −188 2026-07: +326 / −189 2026-08: +328 / −190 2026-09: +317 / −171 2026-10: +192 / −83 2016/112017/012018/012019/012020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Positive share per month

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Monthly data overall 77.9% 2016-11: 69.5%2016-12: 73.5%2017-01: 73.7%2017-02: 73.5%2017-03: 74.4%2017-04: 72.9%2017-05: 56.1%2017-06: 66.6%2017-07: 72.9%2017-08: 71.3%2017-09: 72.1%2017-10: 67.9%2017-11: 79.1%2017-12: 77.9%2018-01: 75.1%2018-02: 69.6%2018-03: 65.9%2018-04: 55.5%2018-05: 62.4%2018-06: 61.8%2018-07: 67.9%2018-08: 66.3%2018-09: 72.2%2018-10: 69.7%2018-11: 79.1%2018-12: 67.2%2019-01: 68.1%2019-02: 69.7%2019-03: 68.4%2019-04: 74.4%2019-05: 66.3%2019-06: 79.1%2019-07: 82.2%2019-08: 70.2%2019-09: 74.8%2019-10: 82.3%2019-11: 87.4%2019-12: 83.6%2020-01: 81.5%2020-02: 85.0%2020-03: 83.9%2020-04: 82.2%2020-05: 81.3%2020-06: 84.5%2020-07: 82.5%2020-08: 80.6%2020-09: 81.3%2020-10: 82.2%2020-11: 84.8%2020-12: 82.9%2021-01: 83.8%2021-02: 83.6%2021-03: 84.9%2021-04: 83.9%2021-05: 80.1%2021-06: 79.5%2021-07: 79.7%2021-08: 80.5%2021-09: 82.5%2021-10: 80.3%2021-11: 84.4%2021-12: 80.3%2022-01: 80.6%2022-02: 80.9%2022-03: 81.8%2022-04: 81.6%2022-05: 79.3%2022-06: 78.8%2022-07: 76.3%2022-08: 76.6%2022-09: 79.6%2022-10: 76.4%2022-11: 81.9%2022-12: 79.7%2023-01: 81.1%2023-02: 79.2%2023-03: 77.6%2023-04: 77.8%2023-05: 77.8%2023-06: 75.6%2023-07: 76.7%2023-08: 74.5%2023-09: 75.8%2023-10: 74.0%2023-11: 81.8%2023-12: 76.6%2024-01: 75.3%2024-02: 74.2%2024-03: 65.6%2024-04: 67.2%2024-05: 72.0%2024-06: 73.8%2024-07: 71.7%2024-08: 71.4%2024-09: 72.3%2024-10: 71.4%2024-11: 79.3%2024-12: 73.9%2025-01: 46.8%2025-02: 67.7%2025-03: 68.5%2025-04: 69.0%2025-05: 66.6%2025-06: 65.8%2025-07: 65.1%2025-08: 65.4%2025-09: 68.5%2025-10: 67.9%2025-11: 78.0%2025-12: 73.8%2026-01: 67.9%2026-02: 68.2%2026-03: 64.1%2026-04: 67.7%2026-05: 65.8%2026-06: 66.1%2026-07: 63.3%2026-08: 63.3%2026-09: 65.0%2026-10: 69.8% 2016/112017/012018/012019/012020/012021/012022/012023/012024/012025/012026/01

Months with under 30 reviews are omitted from the rate.

Reviews per day, last 30 days

0 10 20 30 2026-09-19: +13 / −6 2026-09-20: +15 / −8 2026-09-21: +8 / −4 2026-09-22: +3 / −2 2026-09-23: +7 / −2 2026-09-24: +10 / −7 2026-09-25: +12 / −8 2026-09-26: +13 / −8 2026-09-27: +12 / −4 2026-09-28: +8 / −4 2026-09-29: +3 / −5 2026-09-30: +12 / −5 2026-10-01: +14 / −8 2026-10-02: +8 / −6 2026-10-03: +9 / −4 2026-10-04: +11 / −9 2026-10-05: +11 / −4 2026-10-06: +14 / −6 2026-10-07: +11 / −1 2026-10-08: +7 / −4 2026-10-09: +9 / −4 2026-10-10: +11 / −2 2026-10-11: +11 / −3 2026-10-12: +13 / −5 2026-10-13: +8 / −3 2026-10-14: +14 / −4 2026-10-15: +11 / −3 2026-10-16: +6 / −6 2026-10-17: +16 / −8 2026-10-18: +8 / −3 09/1909/2610/0310/1010/17
Show monthly data as a table
MonthPositiveNegativePositive
2016-111,67073269.5%
2016-1256220373.5%
2017-0148717473.7%
2017-0236313173.5%
2017-0330810674.4%
2017-042619772.9%
2017-0525319856.1%
2017-0630915566.6%
2017-0736913772.9%
2017-0832112971.3%
2017-0932112472.1%
2017-1034516367.9%
2017-1173919579.1%
2017-1243012277.9%
2018-0145515175.1%
2018-0233514669.6%
2018-0334417865.9%
2018-0430024155.5%
2018-0535321362.4%
2018-0630618961.8%
2018-0728513567.9%
2018-0825212866.3%
2018-0927810772.2%
2018-1033314569.7%
2018-111,00926679.1%
2018-1240019567.2%
2019-0142219868.1%
2019-0238516769.7%
2019-0333315468.4%
2019-0435812374.4%
2019-0533917266.3%
2019-061,06928279.1%
2019-071,19825982.2%
2019-0832313770.2%
2019-0944915174.8%
2019-1087918982.3%
2019-113,49450387.4%
2019-122,43447683.6%
2020-012,10147681.5%
2020-022,83149985.0%
2020-031,98137983.9%
2020-042,26048982.2%
2020-052,01646481.3%
2020-062,81851684.5%
2020-071,69235882.5%
2020-081,51036380.6%
2020-091,54735681.3%
2020-101,69736782.2%
2020-112,63047184.8%
2020-122,88459682.9%
2021-012,66851783.8%
2021-022,51049283.6%
2021-032,62346784.9%
2021-042,72852483.9%
2021-052,49662180.1%
2021-062,48464179.5%
2021-072,33559679.7%
2021-082,54361680.5%
2021-092,51453582.5%
2021-102,35857880.3%
2021-113,39262584.4%
2021-122,86970480.3%
2022-012,86568980.6%
2022-022,49258980.9%
2022-032,22049381.8%
2022-042,03245781.6%
2022-051,85548379.3%
2022-062,15357978.8%
2022-071,79355776.3%
2022-081,98760776.6%
2022-091,94949979.6%
2022-101,36041976.4%
2022-111,06223481.9%
2022-121,06327179.7%
2023-011,17627481.1%
2023-021,11529379.2%
2023-0398228477.6%
2023-0483523877.8%
2023-0586424677.8%
2023-0688428675.6%
2023-0796229276.7%
2023-0884829174.5%
2023-0978425075.8%
2023-1086430474.0%
2023-111,20926981.8%
2023-121,25338376.6%
2024-011,13737375.3%
2024-0286830274.2%
2024-0386845565.6%
2024-0462230467.2%
2024-0570627472.0%
2024-0673826273.8%
2024-0781632271.7%
2024-0885534371.4%
2024-0964924972.3%
2024-1059323871.4%
2024-1192924379.3%
2024-1299635173.9%
2025-019891,12246.8%
2025-0258427867.7%
2025-0353324568.5%
2025-0444019869.0%
2025-0544122166.6%
2025-0648525265.8%
2025-0744323865.1%
2025-0842522565.4%
2025-0940218568.5%
2025-1041019467.9%
2025-1180722778.0%
2025-1256820273.8%
2026-0160228567.9%
2026-0242920068.2%
2026-0332318164.1%
2026-0432515567.7%
2026-0535218365.8%
2026-0636718866.1%
2026-0732618963.3%
2026-0832819063.3%
2026-0931717165.0%
2026-101928369.8%
Show daily data as a table
DayPositiveNegative
2026-09-19136
2026-09-20158
2026-09-2184
2026-09-2232
2026-09-2372
2026-09-24107
2026-09-25128
2026-09-26138
2026-09-27124
2026-09-2884
2026-09-2935
2026-09-30125
2026-10-01148
2026-10-0286
2026-10-0394
2026-10-04119
2026-10-05114
2026-10-06146
2026-10-07111
2026-10-0874
2026-10-0994
2026-10-10112
2026-10-11113
2026-10-12135
2026-10-1383
2026-10-14144
2026-10-15113
2026-10-1666
2026-10-17168
2026-10-1883
06 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

Recent sentiment

PeriodPositiveReviews
Last 30 days67.6%445
Last 180 days65.6%2,923
All time77.8%153,625
Japanese, last 180 days40.0%15
08 / TRUEGG INSIGHTS

About this verdict

Every figure is computed from review data that Steam makes public. No AI estimation is used.

Review text is never stored or republished. Read the actual reviews on Steam.

If you disagree with this verdict, please reach us via the contact on the About page. About

Read the methodology and its limits Read reviews on Steam ↗